• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss research evidence relating to Human Altruism and/or bystander behaviour When studying the explanations of bystander behaviour, Latane and Darley

Extracts from this document...


Discuss research evidence relating to Human Altruism and/or bystander behaviour When studying the explanations of bystander behaviour, Latane and Darley (1970) formulated the decision model, which is a five stage model to explain why bystanders at emergencies sometimes do and sometimes do not offer help. Before bystanders intervene, they go through a series of stages. At first, they must notice the situation, then they must interpret as to whether or not it is an emergency, they must then decide to accept some personality and then consider what the best form of intervention is. Lastly, at stage five, they must decide how to implement their intervention. At each stage of this model, observers may make a decision that inhibits helping. Latane and Darley identified two distinct psychological processes that might explain the social inhibition effect. If one emergency is witnessed by more than one person, the less the personal responsibility there is for one individual bystander. ...read more.


found that bystanders who stood face-to-face with other bystanders were more likely to help in an emergency than those who stood back to back. They concluded that the effects of pluralistic were stronger when in the back-to-back condition as bystanders were unable to see each others facial expressions, so were deprived of important interpretative cues. Secondly, the arousal: cost-reward model by Piliavin et al (1981) suggests that when people come across someone in need, they work their way through various stages before they respond or walk away. The first requirement is for the bystander to experience physiological arousal. When we see someone in distress, we become physiologically aroused. This arousal is unpleasant so we are motivated to reduce it. The greater the arousal, the more likely it is that a bystander will help. When people are in a state of personal distress, they are motivated to do something about it, but first costs and benefits have to be calculated. This means weighing up the costs of helping against the costs of not helping. ...read more.


The likelihood of students agreeing to help was higher when their costs were low and the costs of not helping were high. Helpfulness was much lower in all other conditions. Many studies of bystander behaviour suffer from the same problems as studies of Altruism- they use studies of psychology students as participants, and some of the experimental set-ups may lack believability. There have, however, been a number of field experiments of bystander behaviour and such experiments have their pros and cons. The behaviour studied is real-life behaviour, and since participants are not aware of participating in an experiment, they do not change their behaviour in response to experimental cues. On the downside, it is more difficult to control extraneous variables. Moreover, field studies have also shown that people who are not in a laboratory tend to behave differently, which means that many of the laboratory findings reported may well lack ecological validity. ?? ?? ?? ?? Zara Aslam Psychology A-level Essay- Pro and Anti-Social Behaviour 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and Contrast two theories of Bystander Behaviour

    4 star(s)

    (1995) believe that this model provides a valuable framework for understanding Bystander behaviour. Although this model was originally designed to explain intervention in emergency situations it has been successfully applied to many other events. However, it doesn't provide a complete picture; it doesn't tell us why these 'no' decisions are taken

  2. Peer reviewed

    Discuss research relating to bystander behaviour.

    4 star(s)

    Participants assumed that his intervention would not be necessary, as confederates would have taken care of the situation. However, it could be argued that as the experiment was lab based it holds no ecological validity, and therefore the results cannot be generalised to real life situations.

  1. Bystander behaviour - I am going to talk about bystander intervention (why some people ...

    Below shows 5 stages Latene and Barley believe is a bystander's behaviour in an emergency. 1. Does the bystander notice the situation (if he does not notice how could he help)? 2. Does the bystander see it as an emergency (or are they just fooling around)?

  2. Pro and Anti Social Behaviour

    The deindividuation theory is also supported by Zimbardo (1969) who left 'abandoned' cars in New York and a small town in California. He found the 'abandoned' car in the big city was stripped and vandalised very quickly whereas the one in the small town was left alone. This suggests that the larger the group, the more anonymous the individual is and, consequently, the more extreme the antisocial behaviour becomes.

  1. Pro and Anti Social Behaviour

    Most of the students who felt personal distress offered to take the shocks when escape was difficult but few did when escape was easy. Those who felt personal distress offered to help for fear of personal disapproval. Conclusion: Those feeling empathic concern wanted to help Elaine for unselfish reasons (although

  2. "Consider whether the new procedures relating to anti-social behaviour in the Anti-Social Behaviour Bill ...

    It is possible that forcing such a young person into such exile could create future psychological problems, or increase the likeliness of repeated similar crimes or could deprive him of the equal opportunity every human being has to work; the odds of an employer accepting David as an employee in the future are limited by the excessive punishment.

  1. Outline and evaluate two or more studies relating to human altruism and/or Bystander Behaviour

    It was found that those in the high empathy condition chose to stay more than those in the low empathy condition. Later a modified version of this study was repeated to eliminate the idea of people taking 'Elaine's place purely to be socially accepted and not look bad amongst others.

  2. Outline 2 or more explanations of human altruism

    These models show some understanding of empathy, however there are limitations to these. The empathy - altruism model has an alternative explanation. Seeing as the research done with this model is only done with short-term helping and not anything to do with long term, which has been found in people.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work