• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss research into one error of attribution (self serving bias)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss research into one error of attribution (self serving bias) Jones and Nisbett argue that observers are more likely to make dispositional attributions when explaining the behaviour of others whilst the actors themselves are more likely to consider the full range of causes of their own behaviour and are thus more likely to make situational or external attributions. However, Miller and Ross (1975) indicate that the soc-called actor-observer bias is most applicable to negative events and may in fact be reversed completely when actors consider their own achievements or successes. They describe two biases which have collectively been termed the self serving bias. This encompasses the self enhancing bias, where the individual explains his or her achievements in terms of internal factors or disposition and the self protecting bias where s/he 'blames' negative outcomes or failures upon situational factors outside of his or her own control. This form of attributional bias is very well supported and there are many examples of self serving bias in the literature. For example Lau and Russell (1980) explored this concept by conducting a content analysis of attributions made in the sports pages of American newspapers. They compared the explanations given by sportswriters with interviews with the America Football coaches and players. They found that the coaches and players were more likely to credit their wins to internal factors such as hard work, the good shape of the team, natural talent etc and losses to external factors such as injuries, weather, foul play from the opposing team, etc. ...read more.

Middle

This is part of 'impression management' theory and the argument here is that we should attempt to present ourselves to others in the best possible light. We might assume that this serves an evolutionary function with regard to sexual selection, (mate choice) and also natural selection, as this way of thinking encourages perseverance as even when we are failing we are encouraged to continue. However, there is also an alternative explanation which has been presented by Miller and Ross, (1975) which is purely cognitive and suggests that we sometimes make erroneous dispositional attributions about o0ur success and this is because we generally intend to succeed at the thing s that we do, we therefore apply effort and when we succeed we assume that this is because we worked hard and intended to do so. When we fail this is not expected and therefore we are more likely to look for causes outside ourselves. However, this explanation is refuted by a the results of a study by Miller (1976) who gave Pps a test of social perceptiveness and then randomly told them that they had either passed or failed. Half were told it was a well standardised and valid assessment and half were told it was a poor assessment. This meant that for those who thought they had failed in the latter category they had no need to show self protecting bias as they already had a reason as to why they may have received a poor score, (the test was poor and actually they are very good at this social perception). ...read more.

Conclusion

Cognitive therapists teach people with depression to re-assess these distorted attributions and encourage the use of self serving bias as an alternative way of thinking. These theories do not explain however, why certain individuals are more or less predisposed to a certain type of attributional style, be it self-serving or otherwise. In this essay, it has been argued that self serving bias may be more common in Westerners and may serve to increase or maintain self esteem. It also been argued that self enhancing bias is better supported by the literature than self protecting bias, i.e. attributing failure to external circumstances. Research suggests that when people are aware that their achievements may be open to further scrutiny in the future, they may be less likely to use the self serving bias and may in fact use a related concept known as self-handicapping whereby possible future failure is covered by lowering expectations of success by focusing on situational factors. This way success will seem even greater as it was achieved apparently against the odds, and failure is less likely to be seen as due to an enduring problem with the individual. This leads to an interesting final thought relating to whether attributions made are private or public; private attributions may still be shaped by over-riding social norms however, those attributions that are communicated to others publically are most likely to be determined by the values of the society in which we live and therefore research in this area is troublesome as we cannot be sure whether the attributions that we are accessing are indeed a full record of the inner rationalisations that the individuals makes to him or herself at an intra-personal level. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level The Psychology of Individual Differences section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level The Psychology of Individual Differences essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Behavioural Study of Obedience - Stanley Milgram

    5 star(s)

    Some will argue that Milgram was not expecting the results that he did get, since many of his colleagues and students doubted whether many subjects would continue through to 450 volts. This is a weak argument, as this may explain why one or two subjects were allowed to suffer stress,

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Personality in Sports

    3 star(s)

    impatient with intricate skills - Enjoy sports with lots of action - Perform better at high levels of arousal - Enjoy contact sports Also, sports psychologists believe that type A and B personalities affect the way sports persons perform. Type A personalities are normally impatient, time-conscious, insecure, highly competitive, hostile and aggressive, and incapable of relaxation.

  1. Outline and Evaluate the Biological, Psychodynamic and Cognitive Explanations of Abnormality

    The cognitive triad featured 'negative views about the future', 'negative views about the world' and 'negative views about oneself'. Treatment associated with the cognitive model involves both talking with a therapist and evaluating one's own thought patterns. A client will work with a therapist in order to discover the beliefs and expectations that cause their unhappiness.

  2. Free essay

    Discuss the range of methods available to the psychologist.

    This controls the experimenter bias and interviewer effects. Sampling techniques refer to the way in which groups of participants are chosen and samples are the group of participants that are involved in a psychologists study. It is very important in how the participants are selected for the studies, as psychologists are always trying to gain a representative sample.

  1. Discuss gender and cultural bias in psychological research

    A meta-analysis found that in conformity experiments, male experimenters typically find a difference in male and female conformity levels whereas female experimenters don't. Eagly and Carli suggest that the researcher is an important social influence and must be taken into account when interpreting findings.

  2. Intelligence Essay

    He states that those who dis-agree with his ideas of multiple intelligences are simply scared about moving away from the idea of standardized tests, and that linguistic, musical, and kinaesthetic abilities are just talents. Gardner agrees with the notion that these areas may be 'just talents' as long as exceptional

  1. Investigation to find out which gender is better at recognising faces

    Angelina Julie * Sharon Osborne These pictures are chosen because they are very familiar with the students at St Mary's College. The data received from the experiment will be recorded into a table which will then be used for other cases such as evaluation and designing graphs.

  2. Discuss issues of bias in diagnostic systems

    In study 1 doctors had a strong bias towards type 2 errors as they were more inclined to call a healthy person sick. However, in study 2 they made more type 1 errors as they were trying to avoid type 2 errors, by naming sick people as healthy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work