• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss research into 'understudied relationships', such as gay and lesbian relationships, and mediated (e.g. Internet and txt) relationships

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss research into 'understudied relationships', such as gay and lesbian relationships, and mediated (e.g. Internet and txt) relationships One type of understudied relationship is homosexual relationships. These have been found to be different to heterosexual relationships in certain ways but similar in others by a variety of different research. They may differ in terms of attraction formation, maintenance, or dissolution. As far as attraction is concerned, Davidson found that gay men were likely to look for similar characteristics to those of heterosexual men, and were likely to portray similar characteristics about themselves, such as physical attractiveness and status. Huston & Schwartz found that lesbians were in a similar fashion likely to look for characteristics such as a good personality in the partner, both of which are characteristic of male and female attraction according to the sociobiological theory. It may therefore be that attraction in homosexual relationships is very similar to that of heterosexual relationships. Such attraction may lead to the formation of a relationship. ...read more.

Middle

This is reflected by the sociobiological theory's depiction of men as 'spreading their seed' and women as 'tending and befriending' others. As a result, maintenance strategies may differ from homosexual relationships. Huston & Schwartz found that in gay male relationships, confrontational conversation was used as a means of 'sparring' for a higher status, whereas in lesbian couples it was avoided as it would pose a risk to intimacy and cooperation. This is however contested by Kollock et al., who found that the more assertive partner in a lesbian relationship would often use aggressive conversational tactics such as interruption. Homosexual and heterosexual couples may also differ in terms of breakdown. An example of this is the finding by Becker that lesbian relationships often break down when one partner falls in love with another woman, and that the breakup is initiated by that partner. However, another study found that infidelity in homosexual relationships does not necessarily cause disagreement between the partners. ...read more.

Conclusion

is, small differences such as punctuation, capitalisation and the use of 'smileys' are likely to greatly affect the interpretation of the text. Therefore, we may derive as much socially from CM conversation as from face-to-face covnersation. This argument is supported by Walther, who founded that participants reported perceiving slow replies to email as being more intimate than quick responses. This indicates a degree of 'reading between the lines'. However, other researchers have argued that CM relationships cause a 'social vacuum' which cannot satisfy a person's needs with regard to what can be derived from a relationship. They argue that the 'deindividuation' that occurs by means of CM relationships makes it impossible to know the true personality of the other person in the relationship. However, Young argues that this 'deindividuation' is beneficial for those who have low self-esteem or are too shy to initiate a relationship face-to-face, and may allow them to express their feelings in a more secure way before continuing the relationship. Clive Newstead ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Discuss research into any two typesof understudied relationships (e.g. gay and lesbian; "electronic" friendships).

    This is when individual differences play a major role, such as the effect of past relationships.

  2. Psychology - Relationships

    that the participants chose a partner of similar physical attractiveness to themselves. Much of the research into friendship and attraction has shown that a dominant factor into predicting our likely choice of friends and partners is proximity or frequency of interaction.

  1. The formation of relationships.

    They found, upon questioning the couples, that the matching hypothesis also applied to those couples that turned out to be friends, as well as those who were couples. Reciprocal liking - we are often attracted to people whom we believe, 'like us back'.

  2. On-line and off-line personae in the virtual communities.

    Anyone familiar with the pattern of life on internet chat boxes and forums ,on MUDs and MOOs5 , or on newsgroups cannot fail to note that cyberspace constitutes a wonderful example of how people can build personal relationships and social norms that are absolutely real and meaningful even in the absence of physical, touchable matter.

  1. Theories on the maintenance and breakdown of relationships

    Rusbult and van Lange say that we need to consider account investments when looking at why some people stay or leave relationships. The model argues that commitment is the best predictor of whether or not a couple will stay together.

  2. AQA A2 Psychology Unit 3 Relationships: The Formation, Maintenance And Breakdown of Romantic Relationships ...

    * People who were dating viewed members of the opposite sex as less attractive than did those who were single. Rusbult and Martz (1995) - Relationship investment and abusive relationships * Women seeking refuge from abusive relationships were interviewed. * It was found that those most likely to return to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work