• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the relationship between sexual selection and human reproductive behaviour

Extracts from this document...


Discuss the relationship between sexual selection and human reproductive behavior There are two consequences of anisogamy, intrasexual selection and intersexual selection. Intrasexual selection refers to the suggestion that males will compete amongst each other to mate with females. This results in some males proving their fitness and health over others, and therefore those males that emerge as winners of this intrasexual competition are more likely to be selected by females for mating. Size dimorphism is evidence of intrasecual selection and refers to the difference in size between male and females. Dimorphism is evidence of intrasexual selection and polygyny as it suggests that a makes fight for access to females. Dimorphism is not pronounced, which means polygyny is limited. Alpha males and sneak copulation are also evidence of intrasexual selection. The fact that males compete for dominance is supported by nonhuman animal hierarchies, which show that less dominant males engage in secretive copulation when the alpha male is unlikely to know about it. Sperm competition theory and the "testicular effect" proposed by Short who says that testicle size is related to the level of sperm competition. ...read more.


Such control increases the possibility that nay child the man rears is carrying his genes. Following on from this, males should protect their women by showing jealousy and should show greater concern about sexual infidelity since it reduces paternal certainty. Females should be more concerned emotional infidelity. Evidence for intersexual selection can be seen in studies by Buss, Davis and Clark and Hatfield. Buss did a survey across 37 cultures and found that males rated youth and physical attractiveness, and that females rated resources. Davis' study supports Buss' as Davis found gender differences in qualities emphasized in personal adverrtisements. Women tended to emphasise their physical attrativeness and desire for a high-status man, whereas men tented to indicate their resources and their desire for a younger physically attractive partner. This led Davis to conclude that women were looking for "success objects" and men were looking for "sex objects". Clark and Hatfield also supported intersexual selection as it provides evidence that females are more discerning than males. In this study male and female college students were approached by confederates and asked if they would sleep with them that night. ...read more.


Females often only had their appearance to rely upon to attract a male and the preference for men with resources may be due to social factors, which restricted the females' ability to provide for herself. Evolutionary explanations cannot account for females who do not want children, for males who bring up other men's children and for homosexual relationships. Love id ignored, which may be a more valid reason for sexual behaviour than reproduction. Evolutionary theorists predict that reproductive behaviour is consistent across time, when in fact changes do occur. For example, males are far more involved today in child rearing then they were even a generation ago. Evolutionary theory is able to offer a partial account of behaviour in terms of inherited behaviour characteristics, which provides the programming for a particular behaviour. However, they ignore the 'options' within that program, and human behaviour needs to be considered as multifactorial; that is, an interaction between nature and nurture. This is illustrated in a study be Strassberg were mate choices preferences were not as predicted. Strassberg's research on internet dating contradicts the traditional sexual stereotypes, fictitious ads were placed on an internet dating site, which advertised women as "very attractive", "passionate and sensitive", or "financially successful and ambitious". ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Developmental Psychology essays

  1. Is Popular culture an Influence on Violent Behaviour?

    Ergo, the studies of Eysenck and Nias now show that violence is something inbred into individuals, relating back to Marilyn Manson's views on Columbine. Thus, the evidence given in chapter 1 regarding the influence popular culture can have over violent behaviour can be associated with a propensity towards violence of the population and not popular culture itself.

  2. Do playgroups encourage gender stereotypes?

    Both of the leaders' responses to the question asking whether or not the children are encouraged to take part in things, was that they were encouraged but not pressured into doing things (I noticed this in my observations- a leader would go to a child looking lost and say 'would you like to do that?'

  1. Samuel and Bryant (conservation)Bandura, Ross and Ross (aggression)Hraba and Grant (doll choice) a. What ...

    The participants of Samuel and Bryant's study were 252 boys and girls between the ages of 5 and 8.5 years old. This portrays a combination of children in the preoperational stage and the concrete operational stage. They were divided into 4 subgroups of 63 children whose mean ages were 5

  2. Relationships between men and women.

    Working class children on the other hand, especially boys would often have to start work very young. There was a wider range of jobs for boys were available but girls would often have to work in cotton factories. The hours would be long and the pay and conditions would often be unfair.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work