• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the reliability issues of the experimental method

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss the reliability issues of the experimental method. An experimental method is where the researcher manipulates an independent variable under controlled conditions in order to measure the effect on the dependent variable. It allows researchers to identify the differences between conditions. There are three main types of experiments these are, a laboratory experiment, a field experiment and a quasi experiment. Each have their own strengths and weaknesses. Experiments are reliable as they use objectivity instead of subjectivity. Objectivity is not being influenced by personal feelings or opinions; only considering facts. This is what makes the experiment reliable. If there is no interpretation of any information gathered then there is no space for mistakes. ...read more.

Middle

She measured the amount of eye focus on the gun or cheque and the amount of people who got the suspect wrong on each condition. This is how she measured the dependent variable. The amount of people that got the suspect correct on the condition where the man was holding a cheque to the cashier was 38.9% and the amount of participants that got the suspect correct on the condition where the man was holding a gun was 11.1%. Also an average of 2.44 fixations on the cheque and an average of 3.72 fixations on the gun. This proved her hypothesis right that weapon focus should be taken into account as peoples memory's are affected by the stress of seeing a weapon. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also if an experiment took place say within a hard to reach participant group there is no saying that this will be accomplished again. Also by controlling the variables so much there can be complications as the results could come out differently than if they had not controlled the variables. For example the experiment by Dement and Kleitman on sleep and dreaming had this problem. Dement and Kleitman told their participants not to drink coffee or have any stimulants before they came in to the laboratory. But problem with this is that some of the participants may have a cup of tea or coffee before they go to bed at night. Also they aren't sleeping in their own beds therefore they may not sleep as well as they would do in their own beds, therefore creating reliability and ecological validity issues. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level The Psychology of Individual Differences section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Response to the question

The candidate here has made a good effort in trying to evaluate the reliability o f the experimental research method. They have consulted with empirical evidence from Elizabeth Loftus' study into weapon focus as a factor influencing memory, but I ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The candidate here has made a good effort in trying to evaluate the reliability o f the experimental research method. They have consulted with empirical evidence from Elizabeth Loftus' study into weapon focus as a factor influencing memory, but I would argue the evaluation and overall discussion is slightly lacking in clarity and balance. Some examples of criticism and support for the research method are not structured as part of a cohesive segment of the essay, so the structure is a little slapdash. It would be better to provide an introduction and then the evaluation, integrating references to a variety of relevant studies in order to best achieve the maximum possible marks whilst covering all the important information.

Level of analysis

The level of Analysis is more expected of a GCSE student than an A Level student. The is because the analysis is spread out irregularly throughout the answer with a random description of a study by Loftus in the middle. It would serve the candidate better to adhere to the layout I suggested earlier, as this would help them cover all the necessary information. I would also like to see more of an integrated analysis. The first to points raised show how this candidate could do this - instead of talking about the reliability of the methodology of experiments and then how the results of experiments include primarily quantitative data, link these two together - "A strength of experiments is that they usually collect quantitative data as opposed to more subjective qualitative data. The strength here is that because numbers are universal standards they can be statistically analysed without having to worry about personal interpretation or experimenter bias. he same can be said for the experiment's methodology - it is often unbiased due to the heavily controlled settings and predetermined conditions in which the experimenters aim to manipulate behaviour. So the overall strength is that experimenter bias can be ironed out with regards to methodology and the results.

Integration like the above will help create a more smoothly-running answer that feels more confident to the examiner, who will then get a feel of the comfortability of the candidate and appreciate their knowledge and analysis more.

Quality of writing

The Quality of Written Communication is excellent. There is no cause for concern either from a psychological perspective or an English one. The candidate uses a number of important psychology terms in order to express their analysis in the language of the professionals, and this indicates confidence and flair in the psychological analysis. There is also no cause for concern with regard to spelling, grammar and/or punctuation.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by sydneyhopcroft 25/08/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level The Psychology of Individual Differences essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and contrast the main approaches - Biological and Behaviourist, biological and cognitive, ...

    4 star(s)

    and childhood experiences. It therefore believes that we have no free will or choice on who we become or how we behave. It sees our behaviour as being shaped by forces that we cannot change nor have any control of. A difference between the two approaches is linked to the nature/nurture debate.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and Contrast the five main perspectives in psychology

    3 star(s)

    From this he developed his Hierarchy of needs. He believed the needs in the hierarchy to be innate. The lower needs in the hierarchy such as food, shelter and water must be satisfied if that individual is to progress up the hierarchy.

  1. Outline and explain the principles of one of the following: a) Maslow's Hierarchy of ...

    Perls was quoted in a biography as having said "It is the point at which I experience "me" in relation to whatever is not "me"; when I experience "me" as distinct from "you"" (Clarkson & Mackewn, 1993). The fourth and final phase is "post contact", the experience of satisfaction if contact has been good and complete.

  2. The Gestalt Approach to Psychology

    Behaviour therapy involves either classical conditioning or operant conditioning (Gross & McIlveen, 1996). The cognitive model is considered by some to be very similar to the behavioural model. However, the cognitive model concentrates on feelings, expectations and attitudes that are associated with and, in some cases, are considered to be the cause of, mental disorders.

  1. Estimating IQ Psychology Research

    Upon completion of answering the three questions, the participant is then required to read the Closing sheet; see Appendix 3, and hand back their answer sheet to the investigator. All participants are debriefed; see Appendix 4, with the investigator detailing the nature of the investigation, and the hypothesis which is being tested.

  2. invesigating stroop effect

    Stroop showed that participants had greater difficulty in naming the colour words were written in. This was due to the automatic process of reading, interfering with naming the colour of ink. Although, the Stroop Effect has generated further research and studies, there have been criticisms towards the Stroop Effect for

  1. Level 2 Counselling skills. Theories -CBT, Psychodynamic and Person Centred.

    A developmental framework is used to understand how life events and experiences led to the development of core beliefs, underlying assumptions, and coping strategies. CHANGE VIEW: 10 key facts about CBT: Change: your thoughts and actions Homework: practice makes perfect Action: don't just talk, do!

  2. The contents of this essay will explain different psychological approaches to health and social ...

    Drinking can also be habitual and again, the subconscious is where habits are formed. For numerous individual with drink problems, their reasons can be traced to lack of confidence or poor self-esteem. We are all aware how our inhibitions disappear after the consumption of alcohol, but for an individual, who

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work