• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

disruption of attachment

Extracts from this document...


Discuss research into the disruption of attachment (12 Marks) Attachment is essential for healthy social and emotional development. It is thought therefore that disruption of attachment might have a negative impact on social and emotional development. This disruption could occur if the infant is separated from his or her attachment figure. As Ainsworth showed in her 'Strange Situation' physical separation from a primary attachment figure is distressing. There are however degrees when physical separation is unavoidable. In these instances psychologists have tried to study and analyse the situations in which subsequent emotional care could be hindered. Our first key study is brought forward in 1968-73 by psychologists Robertson and Robertson. The study was conducted on a 17 month old baby, who was placed in residential care whilst his mother went to undergo treatment in hospital. A physical bond was existent as his father visited regularly however after two days of normal behaviour John gradually changed as he made determined effort to get attention from the nurses. This competition was found difficult as the nurses were always busy and the other children were more assertive. ...read more.


There observation co-insides with Harry Harlow's Infant monkey experiment as John clung to an inanimate object to resemble the comfort he was neglected of. Do not be na�ve in arguing that this is unethical however as it is simply an observation of real life events. This does therefore give it high ecological validity and in turn brought with it a mass of post analytical evidence. There are certain criticisms though as Robertson and Robertson (i.e. the researchers) were the observers, which means levels of biasness could have been evident. To look at previous studies we can even observe evidence in social and academic deprivation. Skeel's and Dye's studies (1939) used children that showed intelligence difficulties and transferred them to an institute for special needs adults. When the children were tested in an IQ test again they had increased, thus suggesting that the special needs adults enjoyed having children to look after and provided the missing emotional care. This would imply good emotional care leads to good cognitive development. Skodak and Skeels therefore tested this idea in (1949) ...read more.


In analysis of these studies it is apparent many of these results could be brought about through individual differences. Bowlby supports this theory through his observation of 60 children under 4 years who had tuberculosis. The nurses could not provide substitute maternal care and the children were visited only once a week therefore incurring prolonged early deprivation. When assessed in adolescence 63% were more maladjusted than the normal children, but there were more significant differences between them and their normal peers in terms of intellectual development. This suggests that those children who coped better may have been more securely attached and thus more resilient. This shows us that it may well depend upon how securely attached an infant was in the first place - as those that are securely attached may find it easier to cope. This research and understanding of disruption of attachment as psychologists is vastly significant and is the reason for measures taken and implemented, proven through studies like Robertson's who helped to allows parents to stay with their children under circumstances where the emotional and social welfare and development could be susceptible. Gary Holden ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Physiological Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work