• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do we have to learn to think scientifically to understand the world?

Extracts from this document...


Linda Lapina ToK essay No.4 Do we have to learn to think scientifically to understand the world? Perhaps everyone would agree that one has to learn in order to understand the world and events happening around him. Understanding does not come at once. However, there are several new questions arising when we think about the essay question. First of all, to what extent can thinking be learnt? When can one say that he truly understands the world? What is "the world"? And, most importantly, what does it exactly mean to think scientifically and what is the importance of scientific thinking? I will give answers to these questions in the essay. In order to understand the exact effect that science has upon our attitude and knowledge of the world surrounding us, first of all we have to make the usually vague concepts of "world" and "science" and even "thinking" more specific. ...read more.


This word usually describes mathematics and natural sciences, and the factual, clear and logical thinking that these subjects require. Thinking is the most significant of human characteristics, yet we know very few things about this process. In this case, thinking could be interpreted as Basically, each person has his own experience, individual influences and own, unique frame of reference. These are the main factors that determine the approach to life chosen by an individual; even though each person's unique background makes his approach just as unique, there are common characteristics between many of these approaches, taking into account that many of people's influences may be similar. Many individuals share the same religion, nationality and cultural background; many have been orphans or experienced violence; many trust in science and believe it will enable them to truly understand the world. If influences, backgrounds and frames of reference can be similar, then approaches to the world itself can resemble each other as well. ...read more.


The individuals who have this point of view trust in their own or sometimes others' experiences- instead of abstract models, wide theories or general formulas. For an empiric, fire will mean something hot not because it has a temperature of 220 degrees Celsius, but because he has gotten burnt once or twice. Similarly, he/ she will know that if milk is left out of the refrigerator where it is warm, it will turn sour- and this knowledge will not come from his or her learning of biology or chemistry, but from the times when he has experienced something like that happening before. It is very possible that even a person who is a biologist or chemist will not turn to his knowledge in such a case and not think about the specific bacteria that proliferate in milk in warm temperatures, but turn to his experience. An approach very similar to that of empirics is the sensory approach (based on senses). These two approaches are similar to the third - emotional or sensualist approach. This approach is dominated by emotions, feelings and desires. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level The Psychology of Individual Differences section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level The Psychology of Individual Differences essays

  1. Intelligence Essay

    individual is, which is basically what they were initially designed for anyway. Perhaps the most common criticism of the IQ tests, is that most only test two or three different areas of intellectual qualities, such as mathematical, spatial awareness (to a certain degree), and grammar skills, however as there is

  2. The geographical article chosen for the purpose for this assessment is an essay by ...

    These were: surface traits and source traits. Surface traits were obvious traits, easily identifiable by other people. Source traits were less visable, and of more importance. Cattell identified 16 personality factors or source traits that everyone possessed to a greater or lesser amount.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work