• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does chunking help with memory?

Extracts from this document...


Does chunking help with memory? This study is concerned with the cognitive approach, in particular the are of memory, and how the arrangement of data into organised and disorganised categories affects memory and the ability to store and recall data. Research Short-term memory is believed to have a capacity of 7?2 'chunks' of information, which can remain there for approximately 20 seconds without rehearsal. Chunking is a process that apparently increases the capacity of short-term memory by relating and combining the incoming information to knowledge that we already possess in long term memory. In chunking we organise information giving it a structure and meaning tit did not already have, so although we can only recall around 7 chunks a meaningful chunk can be very large Previous research has been done by other psychologists into the affect of organisation on memory. In 1953 Bousfield asked participants to try and learn 60 words consisting of 4 categories, (animals, peoples names, professions and vegetables) with 15 examples of each all mixed up. Bousfield found that when participants free recalled (recalled in any order) they tended to cluster similar items, Eg; if someone recalled 'onion' it was very likely that other vegetables followed. Although participants had not been told of the categories, the fact they recalled in clusters suggested that they had tried to organise the data. Bousfield called this trend 'categorical clustering'. Another study took place in 1967 by Mandler, where subjects were given lists of random words and asked to sort them into a given number of categories (between 2 and 7). Once sorted the participants were asked to recall as many of the words as possible. The results showed that recall was poorest for those who used 2 categories and increased steadily by about 4 words per extra category. ...read more.


Controls All variables excluding the independent variable must be controlled and kept consistent for each participant. This will ensure the results obtained are as accurate and reliable as possible. * Each participant is given the same duration to memorize and recall the data, namely 2 minutes * The task will be carried out in the recreational area of the college for each participant. * The researcher will communicate with the participant using the prepared standardized instructions so all participants are treated the same. * Each participant will be debriefed and thanked in the same manner using the standardized instructions. Table of Results The tables below show the number of words recalled by each participant for both the organized and disorganized list. Organized List Disorganized List Participant No. Words recalled Participant No. Words recalled 1 16 1 6 2 16 2 6 3 17 3 7 4 14 4 7 5 17 5 5 6 15 6 6 7 14 7 6 8 16 8 5 9 15 9 6 10 16 10 7 11 16 11 6 12 12 12 5 13 15 13 6 14 16 14 4 15 14 15 5 16 17 16 7 17 14 17 6 18 13 18 7 19 18 19 7 20 16 20 6 Measures of Central Tendency Organized List Disorganized List Mean 15.35 6 Median 16 6 Mode 16 6 Range 6 3 15.35 ?? = 0.697 * 100 ? 70% is the average number of words recalled from the organized list. 22 6 ?? = 0.272 * 100 ? 27% is the average number of words recalled from the disorganized list. 22 Results Analysis The results displayed in the table clearly show that when words are arranged in an organized structure it does improve memory and the ability to store and recall information. ...read more.


This consists of 2 groups of people which are matched by age gender background etc. i.e. - for every person there is someone to match them in the opposite group, Also I could use a wider range of participants of different ages and people from different parts of the country (they would still need to be matched for the other group) Also I could test a larger number of people than 20 per list. * Generalization of Findings A generalization could be made from my results that organization does indeed prove to increase the capacity of memory and the ability to recall. However it needs to be taken into account that the study was conducted in one small area and participants were all students of similar age and social background, so it can be argued that it is unreasonable and inaccurate to generalize and apply the results to everyone. For example, it would not be reasonable to apply the results of a small select group of young adults to the older generation. The study on the whole was not a natural scenario so it isn't reasonable to conclude that it is how people would behave in real life. * Application to Everyday Life This study could be applied to help people in everyday life. Some ideas of how it could be used is to aid in exam revision for example, by revising from notes arranged in an organised manner should organize the date in the brain and promote better recall in exams and therefore better exam results. Another idea is that it could help people with learning difficulties, if they learn from material arranged in an organized and structured format using subheadings etc it will give it a structure and meaning it did not already have and it should be easier to learn and store the information. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. The Effect Chunking of Numbers has on Short-Term Memory Recall.

    Experimenter bias was eliminated because participants were not affected by any special behaviour in the experimenter's part. The participants may have deliberately "forgot" letters read out in an attempt to disrupt the experiment. Certain participants were also familiar with the theory of chunking to aid STM recall as they also study psychology, which may have affected results.

  2. effects of chunking and unchunking on short term memory

    Method Design The method used in this investigation was a laboratory method with repeated measures design. The independent variable was whether the digit sequence was continuous or chunked and the dependent variable was the number of correctly recalled digits in succession.

  1. Describe the application of behaviorist perspectives in health and social care. Describe the application ...

    person experiencing these behaviors may have lost their indicative and now, don't have a stable sense of what is appropriate and what isn't appropriate and there for showing delinquent behaviors. The individual showing signs and delinquent behavior also could have been giving the feeling of inferiority.

  2. Investigating the short-term memory

    The beep sound was made simultaneously as the stopwatch was pressed. The participants were asked to "please stop writing" after the 60 seconds ended. Their recall results were collected into a pile. The 10 participants were told "thank you for taking part, can you please wait outside to get the result for this investigation".

  1. "An experiment to see the effect of chunking on short-term memory recall".

    However he found if he arranged the words into chunks of information the task was considerably easier. De Groot (1966) also did an experiment on chunking. He found that experienced chess players remembered where 90% of the chess pieces correct places were on the board compared to a much lower amount of non-experienced chess players.

  2. The Effect Of Conceptual Hierarchies On Memory Recall

    enters the LTM, but if rehearsal is not maintained then it will be lost. Craik and Lockhart (1972) argued that any item entering the memory system is analysed in stages. They believed that the kind of rehearsal is more important than the amount.

  1. The Effects of Chunking and Distraction on Short Term Memory Recall

    For example, Banbury, Macken, Tremblay and Jones (2001) studied the effects verbal distractions on short term memory. The degree of interference was related to the properties of the sound specifically and even quiet background sounds have a negative effect upon recall. The word frequency and the rate of presentation are also influential in short term memory recall as is presentation type.

  2. The effect of chunking on memory recall in STM.

    Miller (1956) disagreed with this. He developed a chunking method. Miller having reviewed earlier studies of the short term memory said that it could hold 7 +/- 2 pieces of information. So Miller said that it can hold between five and nine pieces of information.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work