• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does the use of a distracter affect short-term memory?

Extracts from this document...


Does the use of a distracter affect short-term memory? Abstract After reading over the studies of Peterson and Peterson, and Glanzer and Cunitz, this investigation has been based around the subject of distracters and interferences with short-term memory. The aim of determining whether the use of a distracter affects short-term memory was investigated by asking participants - students - to memorise a list of words. After the first list they were simply asked to write down as many of the words as they could remember, however after they had looked at the second list they were presented with a distracter and then asked to write down all memorised words. The results and statistical test - Sign test (calculated value: 0, critical value: 3) - indicate that the use of a distracter does actually disrupt short-term memory as less words were recalled in the distracter condition. The theory is that the distracter inhibits any short-term memory being converted into long-term memory. Background The Atkinson-Shiffrin model of memory (1968, 1971) describes memory as a sequence composed of three stages. Sensory-memory is the initial stage and comes about from stimulation of the sensory organs, such as noticing a bright colour. ...read more.


Then these two sets of eight will switch over and complete the remaining task. This will help reduce demand characteristics and therefore make the results more viable. Task A: Each participant will be given a sheet of paper containing twenty-four, four letter words. They will be given ninety seconds to attempt to memorise these words. Once the memorisation time is up, they will be asked to write down all the words they remember and will be given a further ninety seconds for this. Task B: Each participant will be given a sheet of paper containing twenty -four, four letter words. They will be given ninety seconds to attempt to memorise these words. After the memorisation time is up, they shall be asked to complete four basic mathematical calculations. When the participant has completed these sums they will be given ninety seconds to write down as many words as they can remember from the list. All participants will be asked the same questions at the same point of the test as to keep a standardised investigation. A flow chart with a series of instructions was produced, enabling this to occur efficiently [see appendix for copy of flow-chart]. ...read more.


Another strength of the study was the standardised method used for all participants. Each participant was asked the same things at the same point in the experiment. One of the weaknesses was the sample. The results are not particularly generalisable because there were so few people being tested and all the participants were students aged between sixteen and eighteen, therefore not generalisable to the rest of the population. Students tend to be different from other people as they are generally used to remembering information and many have developed a good ability to do so, whereas much of the rest of the population are not used to doing such things and therefore may not be quite as adept at memorising. A second weakness is that the study is low in ecological validity. People do not often find themselves in situations where they have a set time to attempt to memorise words and then a set time to recall the remembered words. A further area of research could be to see if the amount of time given to memorise something affects how the efficiency recall. It is possible that having more time to memorise something would improve recall, and ultimately convert short-term memory into long-term memory. Joshua Kearsley ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Define short-term memory and describe the main factors that influence the number of items ...

    4 star(s)

    After a period of time ranging from three to eighteen seconds, the subject was then asked to recall the original three-letter stimulus. The task was repeated three times, each time followed by a counting task and then a recall test.


    Baddeley came up with the idea that coding in the short-term memory was based on the sound of the word or Acoustic memory. The study made by Atkinson & Shiffrin can be linked to Baddeley study. The investigation being carried out by the experimenter will include some sort of distraction

  1. An investigation into the Affect of Organisation on memory.

    from a disorganised, Null hypothesis * There will be no difference between the number of words recalled from the organised list compared with the disorganised list. Any difference will be due to chance. Method Design For this type of study into memory I will use an experimental method in the

  2. Investigating the short-term memory

    The participants will be given music to listen to for a period of a minute immediately after looking at the words. This group of people will then be asked for the recall of the words remembered. These will also be recorded.

  1. Primacy and Recency effect

    were also fully informed about all the ethics, to ensure the participants are aware. They were also informed that they had the right to withdraw from the experiement. The answer sheets were taken away and the participants were thanked. Results In this experiment, the Primacy and Recency effect was investigated.

  2. "An experiment to see the effect of chunking on short-term memory recall".

    Procedure I chose a list of triograms and acronyms and made a list of 10 of each.( see appendix 1 and 2) After this I decided on my instructions and typed them up onto a piece of paper. I then stood outside a classroom and asked people who came out if they would take part in an experiment.

  1. effects of chunking and unchunking on short term memory

    As 26 was less than both 68 and 49 this shows that my results were significant to a 99% level. I accepted the alternate hypothesis that significantly more digits would be recalled accurately in sequence in the chunked condition than in the un-chunked condition.

  2. The effect of primacy and recency on recall

    Solution: The experiment was carried out as a laboratory experiment so the controls ensured there were no interruptions (a No Entry sign was placed on the classroom door). * Some participants may not have been able to see the adverts clearly.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work