• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does the use of a distracter affect short-term memory?

Extracts from this document...


Does the use of a distracter affect short-term memory? Abstract After reading over the studies of Peterson and Peterson, and Glanzer and Cunitz, this investigation has been based around the subject of distracters and interferences with short-term memory. The aim of determining whether the use of a distracter affects short-term memory was investigated by asking participants - students - to memorise a list of words. After the first list they were simply asked to write down as many of the words as they could remember, however after they had looked at the second list they were presented with a distracter and then asked to write down all memorised words. The results and statistical test - Sign test (calculated value: 0, critical value: 3) - indicate that the use of a distracter does actually disrupt short-term memory as less words were recalled in the distracter condition. The theory is that the distracter inhibits any short-term memory being converted into long-term memory. Background The Atkinson-Shiffrin model of memory (1968, 1971) describes memory as a sequence composed of three stages. Sensory-memory is the initial stage and comes about from stimulation of the sensory organs, such as noticing a bright colour. ...read more.


Then these two sets of eight will switch over and complete the remaining task. This will help reduce demand characteristics and therefore make the results more viable. Task A: Each participant will be given a sheet of paper containing twenty-four, four letter words. They will be given ninety seconds to attempt to memorise these words. Once the memorisation time is up, they will be asked to write down all the words they remember and will be given a further ninety seconds for this. Task B: Each participant will be given a sheet of paper containing twenty -four, four letter words. They will be given ninety seconds to attempt to memorise these words. After the memorisation time is up, they shall be asked to complete four basic mathematical calculations. When the participant has completed these sums they will be given ninety seconds to write down as many words as they can remember from the list. All participants will be asked the same questions at the same point of the test as to keep a standardised investigation. A flow chart with a series of instructions was produced, enabling this to occur efficiently [see appendix for copy of flow-chart]. ...read more.


Another strength of the study was the standardised method used for all participants. Each participant was asked the same things at the same point in the experiment. One of the weaknesses was the sample. The results are not particularly generalisable because there were so few people being tested and all the participants were students aged between sixteen and eighteen, therefore not generalisable to the rest of the population. Students tend to be different from other people as they are generally used to remembering information and many have developed a good ability to do so, whereas much of the rest of the population are not used to doing such things and therefore may not be quite as adept at memorising. A second weakness is that the study is low in ecological validity. People do not often find themselves in situations where they have a set time to attempt to memorise words and then a set time to recall the remembered words. A further area of research could be to see if the amount of time given to memorise something affects how the efficiency recall. It is possible that having more time to memorise something would improve recall, and ultimately convert short-term memory into long-term memory. Joshua Kearsley ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Define short-term memory and describe the main factors that influence the number of items ...

    4 star(s)

    This revelation indicates that rehearsal and repetition are key elements to a better performance and have a significant effect on the ability to recall, therefore increasing the digit span. Baddeley states that another way to enhance performance is to group the stimuli rhythmically.


    Baddeley came up with the idea that coding in the short-term memory was based on the sound of the word or Acoustic memory. The study made by Atkinson & Shiffrin can be linked to Baddeley study. The investigation being carried out by the experimenter will include some sort of distraction

  1. An investigation into the Affect of Organisation on memory.

    from a disorganised, Null hypothesis * There will be no difference between the number of words recalled from the organised list compared with the disorganised list. Any difference will be due to chance. Method Design For this type of study into memory I will use an experimental method in the

  2. Primacy and Recency effect

    After the one-minute duration of time ended the word list was taken away and then they were given a blank piece of paper and told to scribble down as many words as they can remember in any order immediately after the word list was taken away from the participant.

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    Atkinson & Shiffrin said that there are two main characteristics of the short-term memory which was that it had very limited capacity and that applying a distraction would cause the information to be forgotten... This is due to us paying some or more attention to the distraction and therefore not

  2. "An experiment to see the effect of chunking on short-term memory recall".

    This is why I will be counter balancing. This is when you split the participants into two groups so that half the participants complete Test A and then do Test B, while the other half do Test B and then Test A.

  1. effects of chunking and unchunking on short term memory

    All results were anonymous for confidentiality and participants gave consent to participate in the experiment. Participants 25 participants were used for this investigation, both male and female. The target population were 16-17year old students from Cherwell School.

  2. The effect of primacy and recency on recall

    The findings showed evidence to support primacy effect, as the adverts towards the beginning of the block were recalled most successfully. There was some evidence to support recency effect but this was only due to the fact that recall for the advert shown at the end of the block was comparatively better than that of the adverts shown immediately before.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work