Evacuation was a great success." Do you Agree or disagree with this interpretation?

Authors Avatar

                                                       

         “Evacuation was a great success.” Do you

        Agree or disagree with this interpretation?

My personal view is that I agree with the interpretation that the Evacuation was a great success I will now explain why.

The Evacuation scheme was entirely voluntary the children would be much safer and happier away from the big cities with the dangers will be the greatest.Childern were offered homes were they made feel welcome. Evacuating the children would safer guard the next generation. The children’s education wasn’t affected as school teachers would have been have sent away to. The majority of children proved incredibly resolute and adapted to their new surroundings with relative ease. Handing over the children would make them safe from German bombs rather then keeping them at home to face uncertainty and danger. Mass evacuation was a beneficial method implemented by the government because it did the best to assure parents that evacuation at that time was in the best interest of the children.

Source A is a primary source of a photograph of children smiling walking to the London Station which shows success they wanted to go .It could be seen as reliable as the picture was taken at that exact moment. Although mite not be reliable considering the children could have been smiling for the cameras the photo shows only a number of children what happened to the others. Source B is an interview once again a primary source the message given is that children were to afraid to talk which portrays that not all the children were happy, parents were anxious it could be a failure because the children were frightened .Reliability could be seen as children would be upset because they were leaving their parents which would prominently cause mixed emotions. In the interview of the teacher who was actually there so she must be telling the truth. Nevertheless the interview took place 50 years later so this could be a cause of unreliability. Source C an extract from a novel war Carrie’s War in 1973 a secondary source its emphasising foster parents showing consideration.Realibality could be a factor since it’s an historical novel,some of the aspects have to be accurate “she might have been through it and experienced it”. Moreover it’s a fiction novel therefore could be exgarrated therefore it may not be realiable.Source D is an advert a primary source published by the government. It says it’s an appeal for more foster parents in Scotland, thanking foster parents, children were gratified. It maybe reliable because it’s an appeal and shows you a picture or poor children. Unreliability could be a factor they’re advertising for children its propaganda. Finally Source E is from an extract from a mass observation survey in May 1940 a primary source. The message given is parent’s didn’t want to send their children and were worried about letting them go thinking about issues like starvation. It may be reliable because it’s a primary source and there’s nothing to hide…………

Join now!

These sources give some failures and success although more success. Here are some successful points to consider evacuation as an accomplishment Children thought it an adventure as few children had ever enjoyed the ‘luxury’ of rail travel and even fewer had ventured into the British countryside children marched patriotically songs.

In addition children faced a better way of life they were treated like members of the foster family and showered with love and affection for the first time in their lives they actually encountered a lifestyle full of activities and amenities which could have never been felt before ...

This is a preview of the whole essay