• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate 2 theories of attachment.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Q) Evaluate 2 theories of attachment. There are two types of attachment theories one is learning theory and the other one is Evolutionary theory. Learning theory suggest that attachment is learned process (nurture ) which is based on the rewards of feeding and comfort giving by their caregiver, it is known as cupboard love theory because it claims that attachment is based on food and comfort . Learning theory is also based on the principles of operant and classical conditioning. The Assumption of learning theory is all behaviour is learned rather than innate and this includes attachment through classical or operant conditioning, babies at birth are like blank slates, focuses on what people do, not what they think and based on consequences ? a pleasant outcome (reward ) ...read more.

Middle

are automatically linked to an unconditioned stimulus (food). For this conditioning to occur the feeding was accompanied by a bell being rung and this was repeated a number of times .Salivation occurred in the dogs when the bell was rung. Each had become conditioned ?salivation a conditioned response to the ringing of a bell ? a conditioned stimulus. The animal has learned a new stimulus-response link. Another classical conditioning explaining attachment is when babies are born with reflex responses these are automatic. Food as a stimulus produces a response of pleasure in infants ? an unconditioned stimulus (food) produces an unconditioned response (pleasure). Conditioning occurs since the mother, a neutral stimulus at first, becomes associated with the pleasure associated with the food ? the mother = pleasure ? a conditioned stimulus ? producing the conditioned response of pleasure and comfort. ...read more.

Conclusion

strengthened); behaviour which is not reinforced tends to die out-or be extinguished (i.e. weakened).Skinner studied operant conditioning by conducting experiments using animals which he placed in a ?Skinner Box? which was similar to Thorndike?s puzzle box. Skinner thought the term operant conditioning means roughly changing of behaviour by the use of reinforcement which is given after the desired response. Skinner identified three types of responses or operant that can follow behaviour. One is Neutral operants - responses from the environment that neither increase nor decrease the probability of a behaviour being repeated. Second one was Reinforces- responses from the environment that increase the probability of a behaviour being repeated. Reinforcers can be either positive or negative. The third one was Punishers ? response from the environment that decreases the likelihood of a behaviour being repeated. Punishment weakens behaviour. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

This is a perfect example of what can happen when the candidate does not pay attention to the question. The command word here is "Evaluate", and it asks for "two" theories to be evaluated, so the marks are awarded mostly ...

Read full review

Response to the question

This is a perfect example of what can happen when the candidate does not pay attention to the question. The command word here is "Evaluate", and it asks for "two" theories to be evaluated, so the marks are awarded mostly for AO2 (critical evaluation) but also for AO1 (knowledge and understanding), although the latter objective holds considerably less marks and therefore does not require so much to be written about it. This question should be worth about 12 marks, with 6 marks given for each theory that feature a balanced discussion and analysis.

The candidate provides extensive detail about one theory of attachment (Behavioural Conditioning), but neglects to mention a second beyond the first paragraph, where they mention "Evolutionary Theory". As a result, a maximum of 6/12 marks can be obtained here. However, the candidate is not clear nor precise enough when talking about their evaluation and makes some errors which mightn't look much, but actually suggest that there is not a full understanding of behavioural conditioning (more on this in Level of Analysis). So the candidate here can expect to earn 1/2 marks for the small amount of AO1 required (though what is written is far superfluous and more time should've been dedicated to writing a more accurate evaluation and only 1/4 marks for evaluation (plus 0/6 for the second theory which is not written about) making a total of only 2/12 marks for this answer, because they neglect to address the question correctly.

Level of analysis

The Level of Analysis is generally quite poor. Few strengths and weaknesses are identified, and they are not fully explained, so the candidate can only earn marks for the key words they drop in. The candidate is often unclear and not wholly accurate - "Punishment weakens behaviour" is erroneous. Behaviour is strengthened by all reinforcement. To refrain from doing something as a result of negative reinforcement or punishment still sees a change in behaviour, so candidates are reminded that the need for precision and accuracy is important.

Quality of writing

The Quality of Written Communication is poor for both an English perspective and a Psychology perspective. The first paragraph particularly, requires someone with a good level of knowledge about Psychology to piece together what is being said as it simply doesn't follow grammatical norms. The spelling is not so much of an issue, and neither is punctuation. The candidates use of psychology terminology is fair, if a little erroneous in parts. I recommend familiarising yourself with familiarising


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by sydneyhopcroft 11/08/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Developmental Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How does Temperament affect attachment?

    4 star(s)

    Thus, the author suggests that this variability in sensitivity may result from differences between infants' temperaments. If this were the case, one would assume that similar attachments would be formed with both caregivers (i.e. Mother and Father). However, it is proposed that both caregivers will rarely have the same relationship

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contrast Principles of Classical and Operant Conditioning

    3 star(s)

    For example, temporal arrangement relates to the timing of the two stimuli and it was found that delayed conditioning whereby the conditioned stimulus precedes the onset of the unconditioned stimulus and continues for the first part of the unconditioned stimulus.

  1. This curriculum plan is to be based on children aged between nought to two ...

    The pictures on the cards were easily recognisable as the animal that they were supposed to be it may however of been more beneficial if they were photos or printed pictures as they would see what the animals really look like rather than a cartoon resemblance.

  2. Compare, Contrast and Evaluate the Nativist and Empiricist Views of Infant Perception

    Infants are also limited in their capacity to track moving objects; infants under two months are able to briefly track very slow moving objects, but at around 6-10 weeks tracking improves fairly rapidly (Aslin, 1987, cited in Bee, 2000). Here, support is shown for both the nativist and empiricist views

  1. "Critically evaluate Kelley's ANOVA model of attribution".

    Finally, consistency information, about the circumstances surrounding the argument, needs to be considered. For example, there is high consistency if Nicola argues with her dad in many situations, but low consistency if Nicola has only argued with her father on this specific occasion.

  2. Pavlov: Dogs and Bells.

    Another method was backward conditioning, which was where the C.S (bell) is presented after the U.C.S (food). This method produces very little learning. Forward conditioning produced the strongest learning it involves presenting the C.S (bell) just before and during the presentation of the of the U.C.S (food).

  1. Autism & Learning Difficulties.

    It is important to understand here that 'mistreated' may not necessarily mean violent, physical or sexual abuse, it could simply be showing a lack of affection or love for the child. Bettlehiem believed that if their parents were continuously ignoring a child, the child was likely to be withdrawn from society and become individualistic.

  2. Psychology Controversy essay, Nature Vs Nurture PY4

    e a s e s   y o u r   c h a n c e   o f   a l s o   s u f f e r i n g   f r o m   i t .

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work