• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the 'Strange Situation'.

Extracts from this document...


Evaluate the 'Strange Situation'. In 1971 and 1978, Ainsworth reported her findings from the Baltimore study of attachment. Ainsworth's main interest was in individual differences between mother-child pairs regarding the quality of their attachment. The Baltimore study was longitudinal. Ainsworth et al visited 26 mother-infant pairs at home every 3-4 weeks for the baby's first year of life. Each lasted 3-4 hours. Both interviews and naturalistic observation were used. But observation played a very strong role. To make sense of the vast amount of data collected for each pair, Ainsworth needed some standard against which to compare their observations. The STRANGE SITUATION was the standard they chose. Ainsworth and Wittig (1969) had devised this earlier. It was made of 8 episodes and each one lasted about 3 minutes, excluding the first one which lasted about 30 seconds. The 8 episodes of the Strange Situation: Episode Persons present Brief description 1 Mother, baby, observer Observer introduces mother and baby to experimental room, then leaves 2 Mother, baby Mother is passive whilst baby explores 3 Stranger, mother, baby Stranger enters. 1st minute: stranger silent. 2nd minute: stranger converses with mother. 3rd minute: stranger approaches baby. After 3 minutes mother leaves unobtrusively 4 Stranger, baby 1st separation episode. Stranger's behaviour is geared to the baby's. 5 Mother, baby 1st reunion episode. Stranger leaves. ...read more.


According to Lamb et al. (1985), the Strange Situation is "... the most powerful and useful procedure ever available for the study of socioemotional development in infancy". Ainsworth et al.'s classification system is generally regarded as very reliable and has been used in a large number of studies in which attachment has been the major dependent variable. A child's attachment style my change though as shown by Vaughn et al (1979). These are not the only attachment types that have been identified. Main (1991) found that in a series of more recent studies (for example Main et al. 1985), many children proved to be unclassifiable in terms of type A, B and C, they showed a mixture of disorientated and disorganised behaviours. This type was classified as type D behaviour called - insecure-disorganised/disorientated (Main, 1991). One interpretation of attachment type (which is based on the Strange Situation) is that it measures a fixed characteristic of the child. But if the family circumstances change, for example mothers stress levels rise, this child may be classed differently. This couldn't happen if attachment types were a permanent characteristic. Similarly, attachments to mothers and fathers are independent. So one child could be securely attached to its mother, but insecurely attached to its father. This shows that attachment patterns derived from the Strange Situation reflect qualities of distinct relationships, rather than characteristics of the child. ...read more.


It is true that mothers do leave their children for brief periods in different settings, often with strangers, e.g. babysitters. However, any method used in research which deliberately exposes children to stress is ethically questionable. The strange situation has also been criticised for not being realistic. This is because it is not true to life, and it does not reflect everyday situations. It may not actually be possible to generalise the findings to real-life settings. This also means that the strange situation lacks ecological validity. The classification of attachment may actually reflect the strange situation and not the actual attachment. Not all evaluations of the strange situations have been negative though. The strange situation is easily and efficiently replicated. As it is a systematic procedure, the experiment can be repeated under the same conditions. This means that in all experiments the infants are responding to a similar situation. Differences in their behaviour are not then due to differences in experiment. The experiment gives lots of different measures for assessing the attachment of a child to its mother. This is important as a single measure could give a false impression. Research also shows that different types of attachment may have different effects on a child's development. If this is so then it gives a real point to studying and classifying attachment patterns from 12 to 18 months. Jo-Anne Cromack ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Developmental Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Strange situation has been used in many different countries to investigate attachments." Outline ...

    The SS had been devised earlier by Ainsworth & Wittig (1969). They wanted to study how the baby's tendencies towards attachment and exploration interact under conditions of low and high stress. They believed that a balance between these two systems could be observed more easily in an unfamiliar environment.

  2. Psychology - Stress

    men therefore, the results cannot be generalised to the rest of the population and also the concept of hardiness has been criticised because the relative importance of its factors (control, commitment etc.) are unclear. The other problem with it is it's similar to Meichenbaum's Stress Inoculation Training and this also takes up a lot of time, commitment, motivation and money.

  1. Task1 Counselling 1aPhysical signs and symptoms of stress

    Cognitive psychologists assume that mental processes can and should be investigated scientifically. The belief of cognitive psychologists is that humans are not merely passive renders to their environment. One of the weaknesses of the cognitive approach is its failure to address everyday behaviour and experience.

  2. Psychology Cae Studies

    Three groups of 16 boys were tested-They were given reward booklets similar to experiment 1. This time the experimenter looked at which of the variables of maximum joint profit: - where boys could give the largest rewards to members of both groups, largest possible reward to ingroup: - where boys

  1. Job stress

    According to Levision at the age of fourty and above one need strong approval from his employee .If approval does not occur one may experience stress. Being married can also contribute to the amount of stress experience by women .According to Radloff (1975)


    of inquiry; for this delicate l little plant, aside from stimulation, stands mainly in need of freedom; without this it goes to wrack and ruin without fail". - Albert Einstein (cited in Rogers, 1983). Introduction. Rachel (a pseudonym in accordance with the Nursing and Midwifery Council; Code of Professional Conduct - Clause 5.1, 2002)

  1. "Hieroglyphics" by Anne Donovan.

    The standardised tests make things much harder for Mary and she feels even more 'different' from her other classmates. The school do not realise the affect the tests have had on her and do not grasp that they are not going to help anyone in any way.

  2. Attachment and Separation.

    Optimal attachment occurs when a caregiver recognizes and responds to the infant's signals and cues, meeting the infant's physical and emotional needs; and when the caregiver regularly engages the child in lively social interactions. Studies of infants raised in institutional settings suggest that neither behavior alone is sufficient for secure attachment.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work