• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate Theories of the Formation of Romantic Relationships

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Formation of Romantic Relationships Formation of romantic relationships can be explained in two theories. The theories include the reward, satisfaction theory which focusses on classical and operant conditioning. And another explanation is shown through the filter model which argues that relationships develop through three different filters. The filter model was devised Kerchoff and Davis and suggests relationships from in three different filters. The first filter involves social, demographic variables. This filters out all the people that are from different backgrounds and people who live in other places. It?s the people who you mix with who act as the field of available as they tend to be similar as you live in the same area or work or go to college together. With the small group of available a potential partner is chosen. Once two people have started to go out together the next filter is similarity of attitudes and values. If the couple share ideas and beliefs, communication should be easier and the relationship may progress. ...read more.

Middle

Another explanation to the formation of relationships is through the reward, need satisfaction model. This theory was suggested by Byrne and Clore who stressed the reward and satisfaction of needs we receive when in relationships. The formation is based around the behaviourist principles of operant and classical conditioning. According to operant condition if behaviour is followed by a desirable consequence, it becomes more frequent. For instance, if you form a relationship with someone who agrees with your opinion, that provides many rewards and you are likely to form that relationship. We also become attracted to people who are associated with positive events through classical conditioning. These positive events can include compliments or laughter, or anything else that can cause a positive mood. If the person is present when the stimuli occurs then they will be associated with the happy feeling . For instance, if you like parties and you met someone at that party, you would associate the person to the party and are likely to form a relationship because they are paired with aa happy feeling. ...read more.

Conclusion

Overall, both theories can be accused of being culturally biased and ethnocentric. They do not account for cultural differences in the formation of relationships. Many cultures, for example, are more focused on the needs of others rather than receiving rewards. Also in many cultures it is common for arrange marriages to occur. Arrange marriages do not go throughout the steps in the filter model and do not focus on rewards and needs. Therefore, these models do not explain relationship formation as a whole. Also, both theories are deterministic. They suggest that all relationships must be formed either with rewards and needs or through the filter model. Therefore it fails to consider the role of free will and the complexity of human behaviour in that we have the ability to form romantic relationships through other stages and factors. This further reduces the external reliability of the theory as it cannot be sure that it explains the formation of every romantic relationship. In conclusion, the filter model and the reward need theory provides a good explanation to relationship formation. But, with many criticism, they cannot explain the whole of relationships and there must be other factors that contribute to the formation of some relationships. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Describe and evaluate research into the formation and maintenance of relationships

    3 star(s)

    and they had not escaped that state, we may associate them with a negative reinforcement, which also increases both are likely for them and the likelihood is that we could form a relationship with that person. There are problems with this model.

  2. Relationship formation

    Therefore, this relationship is based on negative reinforcement as you are involved in the relationship to take away the upset and sad feelings you have. In addition May and Hamilton (1980) asked female students to say how much they liked the look of male students (strangers), whose photographs they were given.

  1. Deindividuation theories.

    electric shocks in a, 'learning experiment', participants who had been deindividuated (those in hoods and overalls), gave shocks for twice as long as those who weren't deindividuated. Further to this, Donnerstein, Donnerstein and Evans (1972) found that white participants were more likely to give higher electric shocks to a black

  2. Describe and evaluate two or more theories of the formation of romantic relationships. (24 ...

    So it may not be at 18 months where the 3rd filter is most important. Furthermore, Sprecher (1998) found that those matched in physical attractiveness, social background and interests were more likely to develop a long term relationship. This also supports the study because in the second stage we filter out those who are very different to us.

  1. Describe and Evaluate two theories of the formation of romantic relationships

    The second filter is the similarity of attitudes and values, where people with different values, attitudes and interests to us are filtered out. The third stage is the complementarity of emotional needs where we decide how well between the two people they fit together as a couple.

  2. Outline and evaluate one theory of the formation of romantic relationships. (4+8 marks)

    Furthermore, Sprecher in 1998 found that those matched in physical attractiveness, social background and interests were more likely to develop a long term relationship. This also supports the FM as in the second filter, we filter out those who are very different to us and only keep those who share interest and have things in common.

  1. AQA A2 Psychology Unit 3 Relationships: The Formation, Maintenance And Breakdown of Romantic Relationships ...

    an abusive partner were those who: - had poorer alternatives to the relationship - were more heavily invested (e.g. married with children) - were less dissatisfied (e.g. reported less severe abuse). Criticisms of social exchange theory: * It accounts well for individual differences - why some may stay in a relationship that others would not.

  2. Describe and evaluate two or more theories of the formation of romantic relationships

    So, one cannot generalise the results of this study to the rest of the human population. Another strength of this model is the fact that it provides an explanation of how relationships are formed, so this model could potentially help those people who have troubles starting a relationships.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work