• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate two theories of forgetting.

Extracts from this document...


Evaluate two theories of forgetting To be able to understand why we forget, we must first consider the distinction between availability and accessibility: the first refers to whether or not material has been stored in the first place, while the second refers to being able to retrieve what has been stored. In terms of the multi store model, since information must be transferred from STM to LTM for permanent storage, availability has mainly to do with STM and the transfer of information from STM to LTM, and accessibility has mainly to do with LTM. This suggests that one way of looking at forgetting is to ask what prevents information from staying in STM long enough to be transferred to LTM( trace decay, interference, displacement), and another is to ask what prevents us from accessing the information that is in LTM. 1. Trace decay This explanation of forgetting in short term memory assumes that the memories leave a trace on the brain. ...read more.


This procedure was known as the serial probe technique. The numbers were presented at different speeds. If information fades away due to the passage of time, then numbers presented at a faster rate have less time to decay than numbers presented at a slower rate. If trace decay is occurring then memory should be better - more correct answers - when the information is presented fast. However, presentation rate appeared to make little difference. There was no significant relationship between the speed of presentation and the recall of correct numbers. These findings show extreme doubt of the trace decay theory of forgetting. 2. Interference This theory states that forgetting occurs because memories interfere with and disrupt each other. Old memories may disrupt new ones - this is called proactive interference, which means forward interference. New memories can also disrupt old ones, which is known as retroactive interference, meaning backwards interference. Interference becomes more likely when memories are similar. ...read more.


They gave the first word which came into their minds which probably effects what would happen in an everyday situation. They were then asked to learn a new set of words which were linked to the first one. They were then asked to recall all the words they'd learnt. This should result in retroactive interference because the words belonged to the same semantic field. New learning should disrupt older memories and participants should've forgotten the first word they chose. They didn't. There was no evidence of interference. This experiment suggests that when participants behave 'normally' and select their usual associations, interference may not occur. Baddeley (1990) points out that it has been very difficult to demonstrate significant proactive interference outside the laboratory; one reason being that when the learning of potentially interfering material is spaced out over time, interference is greatly reduced. However in the laboratory the experime` `nt is extremely compressed in time (artificially) and so it increases the probability of interference. Experimental studies of interference have very low ecological validity. Jo-Anne Cromack ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Are memories permanent and unalterable?

    4 star(s)

    Most of them had made no use of the language after finishing the course, so this was recall without intervening practice. There was a difference between recall and recognition, but in both, retention seemed to have levelled out over very long periods of time.

  2. Peer reviewed

    "Discuss two theories of forgetting in LTM"

    3 star(s)

    Also in Lab studies P's have to learn and recall information in a short compressed time frame but in real life learning is more spread out in time and so less affected by interference, making studies artificial.

  1. Psychology Retrospective Interference coursework

    The third condition is the antonym condition in which the participants will be asked to learn 10 antonyms of the original list of adjectives during the 5-minute interval. Participants: Target population: Shrewsbury International School Year 11-13 Sample size: 30 students 15 females, 15 males There are three conditions so10 students

  2. An investigation to discover the effects of retroactive interference on memory recall.

    Therefore in order to eliminate this factor I need to decide on a room which is quiet and possibly away from the rest of the school. I have decided to choose the 6th form library as this room is very quiet and has little use throughout the day.

  1. Describe and evaluate at least two theories of forgetting.

    The term given to this is the encoding specifity principle. A study conducted by Tulving and Psotha [1971] compared cue - dependant forgetting with interference theory. Participants were given a retroactive interference task [learning information AFTER the material intended for recall].

  2. Investigating the effects of organisation on learning

    and China (4/20). 303 words in total were recalled out of a possible 480, meaning that 177 were forgotten. The most-recalled group was colours (85/120) and the least-recalled group was countries (64/120). See Appendix 1 for each word's frequency of recollection individually. The independent t-test (see Appendix 2)

  1. To What Extent Is motivated Forgetting Produced By Failure Feedback?

    The participants are then given 10 minutes to learn the list of American states and their capitals (B1). After the 10 minutes, the participants are then told to stop and are given a response sheet with 20 American states on, in random order.

  2. the affect interference has on the recall of words

    They concluded that it was the number of games that were played which affected recall not the time elapsed. Loftus (1977) studied a result of interference from subsequent questioning. She showed participants a film of a car crash; they were later asked numerous questions about the film, including how fast the cars were going when they hit each other.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work