• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate why people conform to majority influence with reference to research and real-life examples.

Extracts from this document...


Evaluate why people conform to majority influence with reference to research and real-life examples. Conformity involves a change of behaviour or opinion in order to fit in with a group. This group can be either a majority or a minority group. According to Crutchfield "CONFORMITY is a yielding to group pressure when there is no direct request to comply with the group." However according to Zimbardo & Leippe " CONFORMITY is a change in belief or behaviour in response to real or imagined group pressure where there is no direct request to comply with the group norm." Majority influence is when a larger group influences a smaller group or individual. Deutsch & Gerard (1955) suggested two explanations for why people conform, Normative Influence and Informational Influence. ...read more.


We conform all of the time. We laugh at jokes that we don't understand, this is because we don't want to be ridiculed or feel rejected by the group. Majority influence occurs throughout daily life. Many experiments were carried out to prove and show why people conform to majority influence. Sherif (1951) investigated to see if people conform to a group norm when making a judgement, this was done by using the Autokinetic Effect. Individual responses ranged from 0-7 inches however a group norm of about 4-5 inches began to appear after a few trials. Participants changed their estimates to conform to the group because they were unsure of their own decision and relied on other's opinions. This can be criticised because the environment is artificial thus lacks ecological validity. ...read more.


This study can be criticised since the environment was artificial and that the experiment was time-consuming and that it was unethical. It was unethical because the na�ve participants were deceived. Crutchfield (1954) aimed to find out whether people conformed to unambiguous tasks when the pressure from others was more imagined than real. Crutchfield found that 37% conformed all of the time but 46% some of the time. Conformity increased when the difficulty of the question increased. He found numerous links between conformity and personality. This study shows that people conform even when people cant see them. This study can be criticised due to the fact that the sample was not representative because only business and military men were used. It can also be criticised for being unethical as the participants were deceived. People conform because of many reasons including not feeling rejected. Clearly, we conform a lot due to majority influence however more evidence will needed to prove this statement. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. The aim of this experiment is to find out if people will conform without ...

    After they had looked at the pasta for 6 seconds, they then wrote their guess down on the next line (line 13), therefore meaning every participant was number 13. When collected, the debriefing was then started. The control and experimental group both had a different debriefing. (Appendix 4i and 4ii).

  2. difference between majority and minority influence

    There is also the problem that those who conform in one situation might not conform in another. Sherif (1935) carried out a study, which also showed conformity. . His experiment was based on a visual illusion called the autokinetic

  1. Critically evaluate research concerned with decision making in groups. Give attention to minority and ...

    Exactly how far do we blindly follow and accept others judgements? Asch criticised Sheriffs experiments for being too ambiguous and not really showing any form of conformity; and therefore was difficult to measure exactly how willing individuals were to follow the judgements of others.

  2. The experiment conducted tested the theory of conformity under the influence of group pressure.

    deny even the evidence of their own eyes. Obedience can be quite closely linked to conformity. It differs however because obedience is about social power and status whereas conformity is about the need to be accepted. Stanley Milgram (1963) conducted an experiment on obedience that highlighted the persuasive power of authority in social psychology for the first time.

  1. investigating levels of majority influence

    Examples of the images of the 'disgusting' pictures used in the slide show can be seen in appendix A. An interactive whiteboard screen was also used so that the participants are able to get a view of the images being used.

  2. Evaluate Why People Conform To Majority Influence With Reference To Real Examples and Research.

    This conformity research was criticised to be artificial and lacking ecological validity. Also, because the task was thought to be ambiguous and that there were no real answers, the participants were more likely to conform. Asch's research in conformity (1951)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work