• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate why people conform to majority influence with reference to research and real-life examples.

Extracts from this document...


Evaluate why people conform to majority influence with reference to research and real-life examples. Conformity involves a change of behaviour or opinion in order to fit in with a group. This group can be either a majority or a minority group. According to Crutchfield "CONFORMITY is a yielding to group pressure when there is no direct request to comply with the group." However according to Zimbardo & Leippe " CONFORMITY is a change in belief or behaviour in response to real or imagined group pressure where there is no direct request to comply with the group norm." Majority influence is when a larger group influences a smaller group or individual. Deutsch & Gerard (1955) suggested two explanations for why people conform, Normative Influence and Informational Influence. ...read more.


We conform all of the time. We laugh at jokes that we don't understand, this is because we don't want to be ridiculed or feel rejected by the group. Majority influence occurs throughout daily life. Many experiments were carried out to prove and show why people conform to majority influence. Sherif (1951) investigated to see if people conform to a group norm when making a judgement, this was done by using the Autokinetic Effect. Individual responses ranged from 0-7 inches however a group norm of about 4-5 inches began to appear after a few trials. Participants changed their estimates to conform to the group because they were unsure of their own decision and relied on other's opinions. This can be criticised because the environment is artificial thus lacks ecological validity. ...read more.


This study can be criticised since the environment was artificial and that the experiment was time-consuming and that it was unethical. It was unethical because the na�ve participants were deceived. Crutchfield (1954) aimed to find out whether people conformed to unambiguous tasks when the pressure from others was more imagined than real. Crutchfield found that 37% conformed all of the time but 46% some of the time. Conformity increased when the difficulty of the question increased. He found numerous links between conformity and personality. This study shows that people conform even when people cant see them. This study can be criticised due to the fact that the sample was not representative because only business and military men were used. It can also be criticised for being unethical as the participants were deceived. People conform because of many reasons including not feeling rejected. Clearly, we conform a lot due to majority influence however more evidence will needed to prove this statement. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. The aim of this experiment is to find out if people will conform without ...

    (Appendix 4i and 4ii). Once read, any questions were answered, after which the participants were free to leave. SUMMARY OF RESULTS. Summary table of all calculations from results. TABLE 1 Mean Median Mode Range Standard Deviation Control*1 79.3 62 N/A 217 63.85 Experimental*2 173.3 175.5 N/A 250 80.79 Fictitious 217.083 200 200 110 34.73

  2. Evaluate Why People Conform To Majority Influence With Reference To Real Examples and Research.

    This conformity research was criticised to be artificial and lacking ecological validity. Also, because the task was thought to be ambiguous and that there were no real answers, the participants were more likely to conform. Asch's research in conformity (1951)

  1. The experiment conducted tested the theory of conformity under the influence of group pressure.

    This was to allow the experimenter to deduct whether any of the participants had any visual perception problems and also ensured that all the participants understood the concept of the questions that they would be asked. One sheet of paper containing the Standardised Instructions (Appendix ii).

  2. Critically evaluate research concerned with decision making in groups. Give attention to minority and ...

    The findings of this experiment may not be surprising but somewhat expected, as being influenced by others judgements is to be expected especially if one is not sure about the stimulus. However it is questioned whether the same results will be attained when the participant is fully aware that the apposing views are obviously in the wrong.

  1. investigating levels of majority influence

    This method was appropriate because it is easier to isolate the variables and it also makes controlling variable easier too thus increasing internal validity. Materials Used: The materials used were samples of images that would be used for the participants to rate how 'disgusting' they thought the pictures was.

  2. difference between majority and minority influence

    In the control experiment, only 1 percent of trials resulted in an error. In the non-control experiment, 75% of participants made at least one error. Although Asch was generally concerned with how one can resist majority influence and pressure, his experiments are generally deemed to be demonstrative of the power of majority influence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work