• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate why people conform to majority influence with reference to research and real-life examples.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Evaluate why people conform to majority influence with reference to research and real-life examples. Conformity involves a change of behaviour or opinion in order to fit in with a group. This group can be either a majority or a minority group. According to Crutchfield "CONFORMITY is a yielding to group pressure when there is no direct request to comply with the group." However according to Zimbardo & Leippe " CONFORMITY is a change in belief or behaviour in response to real or imagined group pressure where there is no direct request to comply with the group norm." Majority influence is when a larger group influences a smaller group or individual. Deutsch & Gerard (1955) suggested two explanations for why people conform, Normative Influence and Informational Influence. ...read more.

Middle

We conform all of the time. We laugh at jokes that we don't understand, this is because we don't want to be ridiculed or feel rejected by the group. Majority influence occurs throughout daily life. Many experiments were carried out to prove and show why people conform to majority influence. Sherif (1951) investigated to see if people conform to a group norm when making a judgement, this was done by using the Autokinetic Effect. Individual responses ranged from 0-7 inches however a group norm of about 4-5 inches began to appear after a few trials. Participants changed their estimates to conform to the group because they were unsure of their own decision and relied on other's opinions. This can be criticised because the environment is artificial thus lacks ecological validity. ...read more.

Conclusion

This study can be criticised since the environment was artificial and that the experiment was time-consuming and that it was unethical. It was unethical because the na�ve participants were deceived. Crutchfield (1954) aimed to find out whether people conformed to unambiguous tasks when the pressure from others was more imagined than real. Crutchfield found that 37% conformed all of the time but 46% some of the time. Conformity increased when the difficulty of the question increased. He found numerous links between conformity and personality. This study shows that people conform even when people cant see them. This study can be criticised due to the fact that the sample was not representative because only business and military men were used. It can also be criticised for being unethical as the participants were deceived. People conform because of many reasons including not feeling rejected. Clearly, we conform a lot due to majority influence however more evidence will needed to prove this statement. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. The aim of this experiment is to find out if people will conform without ...

    One thing that was surprising at the results was the fact that in both the control and experimental, not one answer was replicated, thus not giving a mode for either. The mode for the made up guesses was the same as the median, that being 200.

  2. Critically evaluate research concerned with decision making in groups. Give attention to minority and ...

    He suggested that if people 'yield to group pressure' (Crutchfield 1962) when the answer is obvious then there is much more likeliness of conformity than when the answer is not clear. And so in the early 1950's Asch conducted a series of experiments using the 'Asch paradigm'.

  1. investigating levels of majority influence

    Furthermore we used the internet from the computer to find the images to use on the participants. Procedure: We began by conducting a pilot study; here we began searching on the internet of images people would most likely think to be seen as disgusting.

  2. difference between majority and minority influence

    be effective the minority has to be part of the same "in group" as the majority. The conformity that Asch found could also be explained by individual differences. Some evidence show that those who tend to conform are those with low self-esteem, high in need of social support or approval,

  1. Evaluate Why People Conform To Majority Influence With Reference To Real Examples and Research.

    This conformity research was criticised to be artificial and lacking ecological validity. Also, because the task was thought to be ambiguous and that there were no real answers, the participants were more likely to conform. Asch's research in conformity (1951)

  2. The experiment conducted tested the theory of conformity under the influence of group pressure.

    A tiny point of light is projected onto a screen and the participants are instructed to push an electrical key to signal when they perceive the movement. The variable being measured was the perceived "displacement" or "movement" of the light estimated in inches.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work