• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Experiment to Test Memory Using Recognition and Free Recall.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Experiment to Test Memory Using Recognition and Free Recall. Rita McCauley AS Psychology, 2002 South Trafford College ABSTRACT This experiment aimed to investigate whether cues assist recall. It was expected that there would be a significant difference in recall between the group given cues and the group without, and that the group with cues will perform better. Subjects were asked to learn nonsense syllables and remember as many as possible, in either a free recall, or recognition condition. The subjects using free recall correctly remembered a total of 52 syllables, compared to a total of 87 syllables correctly remembered by the subjects in the recognition condition. The Mann-Whitney U test was applied to the results and this produced a U1 of 6 and a U2 of 94. As U1 was lower than the critical value of 27 the H1 was accepted. These results showed a significant difference, which had not happened by chance, supporting the theory that cues assist recall. * * * * * BACKGROUND One of the theories of forgetting is failure to retrieve. According to Tulving, accessibility is governed by retrieval cues. These can be internal, such as psychological or physiological states, or external such as the environment, context or written cues. Tulver and Osler 1968 paired specific associated cue words with a list to be learned, (at the time of learning) ...read more.

Middle

The syllables were selected randomly. See Appendix 1. 2.) Blank paper for free recall condition. 3.) Sheet with target syllables mixed with distractor syllables, for recognition condition. See appendix 2 4.) Watch. 5.) Pen. Procedure: Free recall condition 1. The subject was given the list of 20 syllables (App. 1), and asked to read the instructions. 2. After two minutes the paper was removed. 3. They were asked to write down as many syllables as they could remember. They were given minutes to do this. 4 This procedure was repeated with 9 more subjects. Recognition Condition 1. As in the free recall condition. 2. " " 3. Subjects were given a sheet with the target and distractor items mixed together, (app.2). They were given 5 minutes tick off the recognised syllables as directed at the head of the sheet. After 5 minutes the paper was removed. All subjects were debriefed on completion. RESULTS A Table Showing the Number of Words Recalled Correctly by Participants in the Free Recall and Recognition Conditions. No. of syllables Recalled correctly Free recall Frequency Recognition Frequency 1 1 1 4 111 12 5 111 15 6 1 6 7 1 7 8 11 16 9 1 9 10 111 30 11 1 11 12 111 36 16 1 16 Total frequency = 52 Total frequency = 107 Results continued For graph see appendix ...read more.

Conclusion

Whilst conducting the experiment the need for further controls became apparent. These included isolation of the subject whilst learning and recalling, as interruptions and knowing they were being watched and possibly judged by others was at times obviously distracting. The age and gender of subjects was not controlled for. It would be improved by having equal number of each gender and subjects from age categories in both conditions. This has implications regarding how witnesses are questions and assisted with recall. Approaches such as taking them back to the site of an event, producing pictures or other material in order to tease out memories that are temporarily lost, and not readily accepting their genuine belief that they cannot remember, should all be adopted according to these findings. The way exam questions are presented and where they are taken is also crucial according to these findings. If an exam requires total free recall it is setting limits of only measuring retrieval under cueless conditions. This could produce strikingly different results from the same student at any given moment than in a condition providing even a minimal amount of cues. Future experiments might include varying the time elapsing between learning and recall or to include performing an interference task. It would also have been interesting to give the free recall group the recognition sheet immediately after finishing free recall, to see how many new syllables they recognised. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. An experiment to investigate the effect of interference on memory recall

    Median Condition A - Without interference 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 7, 9 The median for 'without interference is 5. Condition B - With interference 3, 3, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 7, 8 The median for 'with interference is 5.

  2. Cue dependent Forgetting. This experiment investigates Tulvings theory of cue dependent forgetting, with ...

    (Girden 2001) As the difference of magnitude and a relationship is anticipated, the difference must be detected through experimenting a large enough sample. (Girden 2001) Due to research constraints, an insufficient number of only 8 participants are tested, therefore not enough to reveal the effect of the independent variable because it is possible that participant variables pose distortion to results.

  1. Carry out an experiment on participants to investigate proactive interference on memory recall, using ...

    And in the second condition, the experimental group, proactive interference occurred as list A caused them to forget and make mistakes in list B. AIM Carry out an experiment on participants to investigate proactive interference on memory recall, using McGeoch's 1942 study as the basic format of the experiment.

  2. Recall in Memory Using Mnemonics

    The experiment will take place in a field setting to reduce any bias that would be found in a lab experiment and Independent groups will be used to avoid order or practice effects. Hypotheses As the aim is to see how mnemonics help recall there should be a significant difference in the amount of words recalled in the two groups.

  1. An investigation about retrieval failure in memory (retrieval cues) whether participants can recall more ...

    In the recall stage of the study there were two different continuums. In one, participants had to remember the words (free recall) In the second they were given cues (cued recall)The first condition(free recall), remembered just 40% while as the participants with retrieval cues remembered over 60%.

  2. Psychology Retrospective Interference coursework

    Deceiving the participants and not receiving their informed consent were considered as limitations. First, the participants were not fully 'informed' of all aspects of the research. However, a major problem with informed consent is the possibilities that the researcher will reveal their aim which would generate invalidate findings.

  1. Find out if recall of words is better when recalled in the environmental context ...

    The environment can provide cues that help individuals remember material learned within the setting (Rutherford, 2000). Similar to how the environment provides clues to memory, a person's state of mind at the time they learn something is also important. State-dependent memory refers to enhanced memory for information that is retrieved

  2. Evaluate 3 Approaches to treating Mental Disorders: Psychodynamic, Biological and Behavioural Approach.

    due to their inaccuracy. António Egas Moniz discovered the lobotomy in 1935 after successfully snatching out bits of chimpanzee’s brains. It didn’t take long for him to get the message that his revolutionary treatment was not so perfect, in 1944 a rather dissatisfied patient called his name in the street and shot him in the spine, paralysing him for life.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work