• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Deindividuation Explanations for Aggression

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Deindividuation explanations on aggression Deindividuation can be used as an explanation for aggression. Deindividuation can be applied to explain aggression in groups and crowds through masking of identity as well as having real life application such as explaining aggression by KKK and the Nazis. Deindividuation is the loss of ones sense of individuality which can be accomplished by using a disguise such as a mask or even from alcohol and drugs which can reduce inhibitions making us likely to change from our normal behaviour which aggression is one of. Zimbardo showed dramatically the effect of reduced inhibitions. He had two groups of teachers, one group who were identifiable who wore large name tags and those who were not who wore large lab coats, hoods to cover their faces and were never referred by name. They found that teacher who were deindividuated, administered more shocks to students and for longer because they were unidentifiable. Concluding that the higher deindividuation the higher aggression. ...read more.


Nevertheless, Zimbardo also conducted research into males in a prison study providing an alternative explanation. Aggression is more likely to occur if the victim is also deindividuated. In this study participants were either assigned the role of the prisoner or guard. Prisoners were referred by number and all wore the same jumpsuits. Guards wore sunglasses so there was no eye contact, guard uniform and carried handcuffs. Both the guard and the prisoner were deindividuated to become anonymous members of the selected group. Of both groups are deindividuated it?s easier to be aggressive because you do not know the victim increasing aggression. Similar findings are shown in Nazi Germany and the Holocaust. The Nazi dehumanised the Jews in concentration camps and were treated like animals so made it easier to act in an aggressive manor as they didn?t see them as individuals increasing the likelihood of aggression. ...read more.


This means there must be other factors that cause aggression not just deindividuation. In addition, deindividuation is reductionistic. This approach fails to consider any biological explanation such as hormonal and neural causes to aggression. We know that deindividuation is not the only cause for aggression as if it was we would all show aggression but we don?t. Lastly, the approach favours the nurture debate but ignores nature. It fails to consider that there may be biological aspects. We know there must be other factor causing aggression as not everyone who is deindividuated shows aggressive behaviour and therefore there must be nature aspects. In conclusion, there is a valuable explanation on deindividuation in aggression. However, the explanations fail to consider any biological factors. Kreuz and Rose conducted research into males and found that there were higher levels of testosterone in more aggressive people. This therefore means that deindividuation is not the sole cause of aggression and there are other factor that contribute to aggressive behaviour. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Outline and evaluate the hormonal and neural explanations of aggression

    Wagner, Beuving and Hutchinson (1979) show that if a male mouse is castrated, overall levels of aggression tend to reduce. If the castrated mouse receives testosterone aggression levels increase. There is a basal model of testosterone which suggests that testosterone causes a change in a person's dominance.

  2. How well does the classic theory of deindividuation explain the behaviour of people in ...

    Whilst within a group, the members have a collective identity and are no longer subject to individual scrutiny and associated accountability for their acts. This unaccountability frees the individual of the guilt of their actions, giving them the freedom to commit acts that violate their own personal and social norms.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work