• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Eye Witness Testimony

Extracts from this document...


1a. Explain what is meant by the term repression (3 marks) b. Explain what is meant by the term flash bulb memory (3 marks) 2a. Outline one explanation of forgetting in STM (3 marks) b. Outline one explanation of forgetting in LTM (3 marks) 3. Outline and evaluate research into eye witness testimony (18 marks) 1a. Repression is forgetting because the memory holds too much emotion to remain conscious. Freud (1901) believed that some forgetting is an unconscious, motivated process. We forget certain memories because they are too psychologically painful to remain conscious. Therefore we repress them (push out) the memory and they remain inaccessible in our unconscious. For example, abuse experienced as a child might be repressed in memory. b. Flashbulb memories are a special kind of episodic memory, which we can vividly recall in great detail (e.g. September the 11th) It is called a flashbulb memory as the memory is recalled in almost photographic detail. They can also be about personal events, such as the birth of a brother. For Flashbulb memories to occur the event must be emotionally significant and are often unexpected. ...read more.


There are many studies which suggest that EWT is unreliable. Loftus has shown that Eyewitness testimony can be affected by the wording of questions and people's willingness to make the information fit their schemas, which has serious implications for the judicial system since juries are often convinced solely on EWT. Loftus and Palmer (1974) showed the effect of the wording of questions by changing a single verb about the speed of a crashing car. Using the verb 'smashed into' led to a faster speed estimate (41mph) than use of the verb contacted (32mph). Loftus also shows evidence that the style of questioning can dramatically change witness testimonies. Eye witnesses asked about a car passing a barn were later more likely to say they saw a barn, when in fact the barn didn't exist. Loftus believes that in the light of misleading information, the original memory is deleted and replaced by a new false memory. Loftus (1979) also reported a study where participants either saw a man emerge from the lab holding a pen or another holding a paper knife covered in blood. ...read more.


but the errors made were very slightly higher. Many studies have investigated the cognitive interview technique and have found that it provides more accurate information. So perhaps Loftus simply wasn't asking the right questions. Baddeley questions that EWT research is clear cut. He argues that research doesn't prove the deleting of a memory, but interferes with its retrieval. This suggests that reconstructive questioning of witnesses is very important. Yuille & Cutshall (1986) used witnesses of real life crimes, in contrast to Loftus' artificial experiments, and found memories to be accurate, detailed and not easily distorted, so EWT can be reliable. Foster et al (1994) did a study where one group was led to believe a robbery was a real event, and there testimonies would effect the trial, and the other group knew it was just a simulation. Recall was much higher for the first group, showing that knowing there will be consequences creates more accurate memories. In conclusion, EWT can be inaccurate if misleading information is given which is believable and not incredibly significant (e.g. saying a gun instead of a knife) and if witnesses have little reason to distrust it or question it (as in lab experiments). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    A study by Loftus and Palmer (1974) into the accuracy of Eye Witness Testimony ...

    4 star(s)

    real life situation would and the participants knew they were about to watch a film so thus transferred their full attention to the video, whereas in real life they would be taken by surprise.

  2. Psychology Retrospective Interference coursework

    This is shown below. The mean refers to the average number of adjectives recalled by participants in each condition. The mode refers to the most frequent number of adjectives recalled by participants in each condition. The median shows the central number of the total adjectives recalled by participants in each condition.

  1. Section B Essay: Eye Witness Testimony

    Loftus et al (1987) showed two different groups two different films. In one scene, a customer could be seen holding a gun a restaurant. In the other version, the customer was holding a cheque. In an identity parade, the participants has viewed the clip of the customer holding a cheque

  2. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    Loftus used five participants in the pre-test experiment, selecting university students to be the experimenters. Over the Thanksgiving holidays they would imprint false memories on a younger sibling (the participant) and then record the results. One of the children, named Chris, was convinced over the vacation by his older brother,

  1. A counselling Interview

    three core conditions. (Culley, 1991) I attempted to utilise these elements right from the start of the session. ''Clients may experience a variety of emotions at the prospect of discussing what concerns them. For example they may feel ashamed, fearful or embarrassed.''

  2. Psychology Report

    * Consent. This was controlled because participants were under the age of 16, so consent from guardians as well as participants were recorded through consent forms. See Appendix 8 for copy of consent form. * Confidentiality. To control this, participants were assured that results would be kept confidential.

  1. Describe and Evaluate Research by E.Loftus into Eye Witness Testimony, the implications of the ...

    The critical question was 'did you see any broken glass?? which was part of a longer series of questions and was placed in a random position on each participants question paper. There was in fact no broken glass in the film.

  2. Eye witness testimony is so unreliable that it should never be used in convicting ...

    Witnesses who have picked out a suspect from a mug shot file or a photo spread may then be asked to choose a suspect from an identity parade or line-up, where the suspect is presented live alongside a number of foils.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work