• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Eyewitness Testimony

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss the extent to which memory research has provided us with insights into the accuracy of eyewitness testimony Research into memory has suggested that memory is not very accurate and perhaps should not be relied on wholly when giving an eyewitness statement. One important factor when looking into eyewitness testimony is the ability to be able to distort or reconstruct memories. Bartlett carried out research into the concept of reconstructive memory and introduced the idea of schemas. According to Bartlett, schemas are the way in which we store our memory due to past knowledge and experience and can influence us when we recall a memory. Schemas are a pre event factor. ...read more.

Middle

Loftus carried out two studies into the roles of leading questions and what effect they have on p's. In the first study, Loftus showed p's a film of a car accident. A group of nine p's were then asked 'How fast were the cars going when they hit each other?' An equal number of the remaining p's were asked the same question but the verb 'hit' was replaced with either 'smashed', 'collided', 'bumped' or 'contacted'. It was found that the verb used effected the speed estimation. In a similar study, film footage of a car accident was shown to a group of p's who were then asked 'Did you see a broken headlight?' ...read more.

Conclusion

Loftus discovered that emotional factors can also have a role in an eyewitness's accuracy. She carried out a study aiming to discover whether anxiety would have an effect on p's accuracy of identification of a face. She carried out the study under two conditions. The first condition contained no weapon and the p's overheard a low key discussion whereas the second condition involved the p's hearing a heated row and a man appearing from the lab covered in blood with a paperknife in his hand. The findings were that in condition two the man was only accurately identified 33% of the time compared to 49% in condition one. This may have been due to the idea of weapon focus. This study suggests that eyewitnesses may give an inaccurate identification if they were not focusing properly on the victim/offender. ?? ?? ?? ?? Sammie Pinker ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    The results showed no statistically significant figures, however the detail of the false memories was intriguing. Just like Chris had in the pre-test, memories had been confabulated so much it was clear the participants believed in the hoax, due to the unconscious workings of their schemas.

  2. "Eyewitness testimony differs from many other aspects of memory in that accuracy is of ...

    A study by loftus concludes that misleading questions delete the correct information from memory and replace it with false information. Participants were divided into two groups. Both were shown a set of slides depicting events leading up to a car accident.

  1. The Effects of leading questions on Eyewitness Testimony

    Standardised Instructions were devised by the experimenter and then printed and used for consistency to ensure that each participant received the same instructions (See Appendix ii). To comply with the British Psychological Societies ethical guidelines a consent form was devised (see Appendix i).

  2. Memory and Eyewitness Testimony

    Lashley (1931) found a correlation between how much material was removed from a rats brain and the amount they forgot. The more material removed the less the rat would forget. This shows strong support for the decay theory. However, this research can be said to be lacking in validity because

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work