• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Eyewitness testimony is an important area of research within cognitive psychology and human memory.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Shinbert Aisam Homework 7th September 2012 Eye Witness Testimony Eyewitness testimony is a legal term that refers to an account given by a person about an event they have witnessed. For example they may be required to give a description about a trail of a car accident they have witnessed. This includes identification of criminal also details about the crime scene. Eyes witness began hundred years ago but it only started to take off in 1970s. It is one of the strongest pieces of evidence in criminal trials all around the world and is generally seen to be a reliable and helpful source of evidence for the jury. However sometimes innocents citizens are accused and convicted on the basis of eyewitness evidence. This happens because the human memory is not perfect and eyewitnesses sometimes just get it wrong also the brain is always making stuff up and people don?t usually doubt their memory. It appears that when a new object is mentioned it is integrated into the old memory and subsequently indistinguishable from what was originally seen. Eyewitnesses may provide detailed accounts of events and the amount of detail has been found to correlate with the likelihood of a conviction (Bell and Loftus, 1989). ...read more.

Middle

it had no effect on their memory about the incident but the research shows that the witnesses that experienced levels of stress were actually closer to the event therefore this might have helped the accuracy of the memory recall. Reconstructive memory is the process of putting information together based on general types of stored knowledge in the absence of a specific memory representation. Bartlett says that the human memory is an active process, according to Bartlett research people organise their memories in a way that fits their previous experience, when we remember events the gaps in our memory are reconstructed based on our schema, a way of organizing information. This allows people to make sense of what they saw and how to deal with the situation. Therefore when people find themselves in a situation they don?t understand or doesn?t fit their social values they change it in order to fit their schema. Therefore schemas can mislead information and result in an unreliable eyewitness testimony. Bartlett research was called War of Ghost from a Native American culture participants were British who shared norms and values would differ greatly from that of a Native American. ...read more.

Conclusion

However eyewitnesses testimonies are still one of the strongest pieces of evidence used in the court system today and are accepted as fact by a jury. When eyewitness accounts are correct it can help convict many guilty people but often an incorrect eyewitness testimony can lead to wrongful convictions and severely damage a person?s life. Looking at research carried out it would appear that there are many factors that can contribute to an unreliable eyewitness testimony. Eyewitness testimonies can be flawed simply by the natural memory processes that occur when people retain and attempt to retrieve information (Loftus, 1979). Eyewitness testimony can be affected by weapon focus leading questions and perception and memory, to name but a few. When looking at the results of research carried out and the serious implications of the validity of eyewitness testimonies, it is surprising to see that despite the Devlin Report, 1976 and Court of Appeal in Turnbull (1977), convictions are still being obtained on the unsupported evidence of a sole eyewitness. In the courtroom, perhaps, more emphasis should be placed on the pitfalls involved with eyewitness accounts when advocates and/or judges are addressing juries. Since 1976 till the present day police line ups have increased. In conclusion Loftus has shown how language and wording could influence a person?s recall of an incident. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Measurements of Accuracy of Eyewitness Testimonies

    4 star(s)

    A control group of 50 subjects were not interrogated about the speed of the vehicles. The subjects were then asked to return a week later and without re-viewing the film, answered a series of questions about the accident. In this case the critical question was, "Did you see any broken glass?".

  2. Memory is an important area of study in Psychology because it underpins our other ...

    The dependent variable was the number of words recalled by each condition. There were two conditions in the experiment, a condition that received category headings when recalling the list of words and a condition that didn't. Both conditions consisted of students in Year 11 at Appleby Grammar School.

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    BRIEFING/CONSENT FORM Name of Project: An investigation into memory coding for words with Similar sound and meaning in the Short-term memory. And what effect a distraction can have with the overall result. You are being invited to participate in a study where the coding of information is being investigated and how it is placed into our short-term memory.

  2. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    The witness usually understands the importance of accuracy in the information they are giving and is often reminded of this fact, yet real life cases and laboratory studies have shown that recall is still not entirely accurate. It has also been said that due to the nature of Bartlett's experiment the results may not be consistent.

  1. "Eyewitness testimony differs from many other aspects of memory in that accuracy is of ...

    Bartlett has also carried out studies into the reconstructive nature of memory. He had 20 participants take part in a natural experiment in which they were asked to learn a piece of text that was designed to produce a conflict between its contents and the reader's own schemas of the world e.g.

  2. Outline and evaluate the research into eyewitness testimony.

    scene that do not fit the specific schema, we store central features rather than exact details, we fill in missing information to make sense of what we have seen, we distort memories for events to fit in with expectations, and we may use schemas to provide basis for a guess.

  1. Describe and Evaluate Research by E.Loftus into Eye Witness Testimony, the implications of the ...

    the participants may have changed their behaviour as they knew they were in an experiment. Loftus was also criticised for trying to portray psychology as a science. Psychology should not just be seen as objective and scientific, the study is only one of many frameworks the researchers work in, there

  2. Critically evaluate some of the central themes within psychology Behaviourism VS Cognitive

    Piaget proved this was not true, and that it is because children think in different ways compared to adults. Piaget believed children went through stages of cognitive development, and as the children aged, there was a progressive reorganization of mental processes due to their maturation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work