• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

gender affects the compliance levels in humans

Extracts from this document...


Introduction The aim of this task was to find out whether gender affects the compliance levels in humans. Compliance is a form of conformity, when a person acts according to certain accepting standards. I will be observing peoples behaviours when crossing the road and will take note of those who cross with the lights at pedestrian crossings and those who cross independently. To ensure I get a fair set of results I will have to think about confounding variables, which may affect the findings. This is a natural environment experiment. I have no control over people's actions and since they will be unaware of my observations they will not feel intimidated or pressured into acting differently and doing the right thing. In the past, 1950's - 1950's, many researchers have conducted that there is no difference between males and females complying, although a few psychologists have found that women are more likely to comply. Research by Sistrunk and McDavid (1) indicated that women are more likely to comply if they do not have much knowledge about a specific event or topic, likewise with men. ...read more.


Results Descriptive Statistics Summary table MALE FEMALE Crossed with lights 9 16 Crossed independently 15 6 By looking at the results on the bar chart it is clear that more woman complied than men during the period of time I carried out my investigation. Inferential Statistics Using the 'Chi Square' method I will be able to test my data statistically to see if there is a significant difference between genders. The formula of Chi Square will give me a figure, which will tell me if my results are significant. The critical value which will prove the validity of my findings is 2.71, the result must be 2.71 or higher to be certain that the results did not happen purely by chance. The formula of the Chi Square is: ?� = ? (O - E - 0.5) � E ?� = 5.52 (significant result) p ? 0.05; ?� obt = 5.52; ?� crt = 2.71; df=1 I can therefore accept the experimental hypothesis and can reject the NUL hypothesis as my result is a significant figure. ...read more.


The weather is also a factor I could think about, selecting a sunny, warmer day where people of all ages will be out. Also, repeating the test more than once and using a few different locations where there is a pedestrian crossing. As a result of this experiment, it is clear that on average, females seem to comply more than males. This may suggest that as a gender, females are less secure but more sensible than males also that females are more cautious and careful. Abstract The aim of this experiment was to find out whether women are more likely to comply when crossing the road at pedestrian crossings than men. In order to get a set of results I observed people behaviour when crossing the road by sitting near a pedestrian crossing and recording what I noticed by using a tally chart. I found that 16 females complied whereas only 9 men complied by crossing with the green man after pressing the button rather than crossing independently. In total 24 of my participants were male and 22 were female. In conclusion to my research it is clear that woman are more compliant than men. REFERANCE 1) http://www.ship.edu/~cgboeree/conformity.html ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. The Matching Hypothesis

    This positive correlation provides support for the matching hypothesis and for my hypothesis. The extent to which it supports my hypothesis will be examined by running a statistical test on the data. I have circled 2 rogue results in the graph as I believe without them the trend line would be more positive.

  2. Conformity discussion.

    Discussion The results have been shown to be insignificant on the Mann-Whitney U test; this means in general participants did not conform. This result has not confirmed my Experimental Hypothesis which states participants, would show evidence of conformity. In the introduction it was related that conformity had decreased since the

  1. Why Do Humans Conform?

    From which I then intend to discuss the factors that influence and affect conformity. Social Psychologists have identified two main factors, which encourage conformity. Firstly, people conform because they want to be liked. They conform to the behaviour of others in order to gain their approval.

  2. Investigation into Whether Gender Affects Conformity

    Types of conformity have also been identified. Kelman (1958) identified three different types of conformity. Compliance is when the individual publicly conforms to the behaviour and views of others but privately maintains their own views. Identification is when the views and attitudes of a group are adopted both publicly and privately.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work