• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Gordon Allport claimed that 'attitudes' were social psychology's most 'indispensable concept'. To what extent can they predict behaviour?

Extracts from this document...


Gordon Allport claimed that 'attitudes' were social psychology's most 'indispensable concept'. To what extent can they predict behaviour? Augoustinos & Walker (1995) claim the attitudes area has been the most researched and heavily invested topic in social psychology. The 1960/70's saw an era of pessimism regarding the attitude-behaviour association. However, by the 80's there was resurgence due to cognitive psychology's impact (Hogg and Vaughan 2002). Attitudes influence perceptions of others and also how we perceive ourselves. Augoustinos & Walker (1995:12) believe attitudes are 'real and tangible, which influence the way that attitude owner behaves'. They are tangible in the sense that attitudes are displayed through specific human behaviours and so can be observed e.g. a lazy attitude shown though someone sleeping a lot. But this does not mean that 'attitude' in itself exists as the question infers, it is a concept/theoretical construct. If G.Allport is correct then, attitudes are the causal stimuli that determine particular behaviour(s). Alike many social psychological concepts there is a definition problem. There are blurred boundaries between scientific and everyday meanings of 'attitude'. Reber and Reber (2001:63) vaguely claim 'an attitude is some internal affective orientation that explains the actions of a person - an intended action'. Hogg and Vaughan (2002) believe it has four components: cognitive (conscious opinion), affective (emotional feeling), evaluative (positive/negative) and behavioural (character for action). It depends on the theoretical approach taken when considering which factor is more important e.g. behaviourists favouring behavioural - based upon observed behaviour whilst cognitivists would support conscious opinions. ...read more.


This seems a plausible theory, as we like as high control over our behaviour. Deviating away from American research Parker, Manstead and Stradling (1995) applied TRB to British driving behaviour, predicting intention to perform offences. Strong correlations were gained between perceived control over driving behaviour and attitudes to driving offences, showing the value-added of perceived behavioural control to TRA. These models have the value of being implemented in society e.g. health issues. Protection motivation theory (Floyd 2000) believes a cognitive equilibrium between perceived danger of illness and coping abilities is required to embrace healthy behaviour and protect us. Protection motivation is interplay between perceived threat appraisal (vulnerability and rewards) and desire for minimal negative results (response cost and self-efficacy). This is indicative of equity theory where individuals attempt to minimise costs (threat appraisal/response costs) and maximise rewards (intrinsic/extrinsic rewards), which shows cognitive rationality/planning. However Hogg and Vaughan (2002) believe the above assumptions of intention, calculation and reason predicting behaviour is not always true. It has been suggested that behaviour determines attitudes, therefore a reverse relationship e.g. adopting a role with expected behaviour (drinking at university), may alter alcohol attitudes. Cognitive dissonance theory (Festinger 1957) supports this; an individual will be motivated to reduce an uncomfortable dissonance (conflict) between two inconsistent psychological cognitions by changing one of them/introducing a new cognition. Following a particular behaviour individuals are likely to change their attitude to match it, e.g. if someone is dieting but eats a cake they may feel discomfort/guilt and do sport to restore harmony. ...read more.


This is similar to Freud's critics who claimed the id, ego and superego were fallacies as they were unobservable abstract notions. Overall, the extent to which attitudes predict behaviour largely depends if the attitude is strong/stable enough to elicit a specific behavioural response and whether individuals are swayed by social influence to change behaviour/attitudes, if so this questions individual's free will. Fundamental general attitudes are generally shaped during the socialisation process, firstly the immediate family and subsequently by peer/mass media networks. I believe social influence is more important on the attitude construct than the individual as attitudes can be grouped into similar ones which are not essentially individual. Recent social psychologists have recognised this also e.g. Eiser (1994), focusing upon shared attitudes of social groups. If a reference group (Kelley 1952) is involved; one that is psychologically significant to the individual, it is likely that they will be more greatly affected than insignificant others. Therefore, whilst individuals would like to think their attitudes are their own choice, it could be argued that these are shaped largely by external influences. However, Fishbein and Ajzen (1980) identify, it is the individual's personal evaluation (positive/negative) that characterises whether a behaviour resulting from an attitude is suitable according to their judgement. Attitudes can provide the individual with uniqueness due to cognition. Humans are rational beings and make systematic use of information available (Fishbein and Ajzen 1980), suggesting we are active in attitude processes. It is clear there is evidence on both sides but the matter is yet unresolved, it is highly problematic and still subject to further research. Perhaps there is a need for a standardised attitude definition, to allow universal understanding. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Social Cognition

    3 star(s)

    They help us to function in society as they help us understand and predict how people will behave. Fiske and Taylor proposed that because we have so much stored knowledge about social situations, when we have to remember and use that knowledge, we act as "cognitive misers"- we take short-cuts so we can process the information better.

  2. Pro and Anti Social Behaviour

    However, evidence that noise acts like any other stressor challenges this view. This is suggested as this explains that noise increases the activity of the Autonomic nervous system such as the heart rate, and hormone levels (e.g. testosterone, Bronzaft) Overall Evaluation Theories and evidence which show that environmental features can provoke aggressive behaviour are linked with the Frustration-aggression hypothesis.

  1. Enter Achilles (DV8) Review - Laura Mathis

    man. At no point is it suggested that he is homosexual so not only is it a test for society towards homosexuals, but also the straight mans interpretation of what makes a man. He is singled out; a technique highlighted by the camera angle and strips to reveal a 'superman' costume - a witty stunt emphasizing the male ego.

  2. Psychology Questions Ansewered

    Suggest two other sample for your chosen study and say how you think these might affect the results A more diverse sample-a more heterogenous sample-from different location, different races, backgrounds, age group- you can use two points from this if you don't use the terms homogeneous and heterogeneous as they cover everything.

  1. What Does Social Psychology Contribute to Our Understanding of Human Behaviour?

    Situations and their roles provide individuals with 'selves'. (Hewitt, J. P., 2000) In 1902, Cooley developed the idea of that the feedback we receive from other people is also an important part of the self-concept. Cooley described the self-concept as the 'looking glass self', arguing that what we believe other

  2. To what extent do Social and Media factors influence Criminal Behaviour?

    This new, wider range of influences is continually being studied to find the effect that it can have on people. There are many social factors that affect how a person develops. Social learning theory suggests that much of what we learn is done by imitation and modelling others behaviour.

  1. Pro and Anti Social Behaviour

    Children who had observed altruistic behaviour gave more generously than those who hadn't. Those whore had observed selfishness gave less than the control group. Hoffman (1963) Found a positive correlation between affection from parents to children and affection from children to playmates.

  2. Social psychology - Social Interaction Sequence

    These 150 women were the most liberal and studied whether their liberalism changed despite family pressures or not --> didn't! How people maintain attitudes * Deliberately set out to retain attitude * Seek like-minded people * People find environments that would protect their attitudes from change PERSUASION when others attempt

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work