• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Gordon Allport claimed that 'attitudes' were social psychology's most 'indispensable concept'. To what extent can they predict behaviour?

Extracts from this document...


Gordon Allport claimed that 'attitudes' were social psychology's most 'indispensable concept'. To what extent can they predict behaviour? Augoustinos & Walker (1995) claim the attitudes area has been the most researched and heavily invested topic in social psychology. The 1960/70's saw an era of pessimism regarding the attitude-behaviour association. However, by the 80's there was resurgence due to cognitive psychology's impact (Hogg and Vaughan 2002). Attitudes influence perceptions of others and also how we perceive ourselves. Augoustinos & Walker (1995:12) believe attitudes are 'real and tangible, which influence the way that attitude owner behaves'. They are tangible in the sense that attitudes are displayed through specific human behaviours and so can be observed e.g. a lazy attitude shown though someone sleeping a lot. But this does not mean that 'attitude' in itself exists as the question infers, it is a concept/theoretical construct. If G.Allport is correct then, attitudes are the causal stimuli that determine particular behaviour(s). Alike many social psychological concepts there is a definition problem. There are blurred boundaries between scientific and everyday meanings of 'attitude'. Reber and Reber (2001:63) vaguely claim 'an attitude is some internal affective orientation that explains the actions of a person - an intended action'. Hogg and Vaughan (2002) believe it has four components: cognitive (conscious opinion), affective (emotional feeling), evaluative (positive/negative) and behavioural (character for action). It depends on the theoretical approach taken when considering which factor is more important e.g. behaviourists favouring behavioural - based upon observed behaviour whilst cognitivists would support conscious opinions. ...read more.


This seems a plausible theory, as we like as high control over our behaviour. Deviating away from American research Parker, Manstead and Stradling (1995) applied TRB to British driving behaviour, predicting intention to perform offences. Strong correlations were gained between perceived control over driving behaviour and attitudes to driving offences, showing the value-added of perceived behavioural control to TRA. These models have the value of being implemented in society e.g. health issues. Protection motivation theory (Floyd 2000) believes a cognitive equilibrium between perceived danger of illness and coping abilities is required to embrace healthy behaviour and protect us. Protection motivation is interplay between perceived threat appraisal (vulnerability and rewards) and desire for minimal negative results (response cost and self-efficacy). This is indicative of equity theory where individuals attempt to minimise costs (threat appraisal/response costs) and maximise rewards (intrinsic/extrinsic rewards), which shows cognitive rationality/planning. However Hogg and Vaughan (2002) believe the above assumptions of intention, calculation and reason predicting behaviour is not always true. It has been suggested that behaviour determines attitudes, therefore a reverse relationship e.g. adopting a role with expected behaviour (drinking at university), may alter alcohol attitudes. Cognitive dissonance theory (Festinger 1957) supports this; an individual will be motivated to reduce an uncomfortable dissonance (conflict) between two inconsistent psychological cognitions by changing one of them/introducing a new cognition. Following a particular behaviour individuals are likely to change their attitude to match it, e.g. if someone is dieting but eats a cake they may feel discomfort/guilt and do sport to restore harmony. ...read more.


This is similar to Freud's critics who claimed the id, ego and superego were fallacies as they were unobservable abstract notions. Overall, the extent to which attitudes predict behaviour largely depends if the attitude is strong/stable enough to elicit a specific behavioural response and whether individuals are swayed by social influence to change behaviour/attitudes, if so this questions individual's free will. Fundamental general attitudes are generally shaped during the socialisation process, firstly the immediate family and subsequently by peer/mass media networks. I believe social influence is more important on the attitude construct than the individual as attitudes can be grouped into similar ones which are not essentially individual. Recent social psychologists have recognised this also e.g. Eiser (1994), focusing upon shared attitudes of social groups. If a reference group (Kelley 1952) is involved; one that is psychologically significant to the individual, it is likely that they will be more greatly affected than insignificant others. Therefore, whilst individuals would like to think their attitudes are their own choice, it could be argued that these are shaped largely by external influences. However, Fishbein and Ajzen (1980) identify, it is the individual's personal evaluation (positive/negative) that characterises whether a behaviour resulting from an attitude is suitable according to their judgement. Attitudes can provide the individual with uniqueness due to cognition. Humans are rational beings and make systematic use of information available (Fishbein and Ajzen 1980), suggesting we are active in attitude processes. It is clear there is evidence on both sides but the matter is yet unresolved, it is highly problematic and still subject to further research. Perhaps there is a need for a standardised attitude definition, to allow universal understanding. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Persuasion Theory.

    The six principles are: * consistency, * reciprocation, * social proof, * authority, * liking * scarcity Whether we study persuasion in communications or advertising, the theories could hold, as both are forms of communication and both rely on persuasion to push a message.

  2. Pro and Anti Social Behaviour

    can occur when we are for example, in a large crowd or wearing a mask. We then become more likely to engage in anti-social, un-socialised behaviour. Zimbardo (1969) distinguished between individual behaviour, which conforms to acceptable social standards, and deindividuated behaviour, which does not conform to society's social norms.

  1. whether leading questions can affect a person's memory of a question and insert an ...

    it would be harder to recall a memory from a real situation. Due to much research in the role of age, it is generally believed that children are less reliable eyewitnesses than adults. Racial and gender stereotypes can affect the recollection of a memory and eyewitness accounts often reflect commonly held stereotypes.

  2. What are attribution biases and when do they occur?

    is related to the fundamental attribution error. It suggests that although observers tend to explain other people's behaviour in internal dispositional terms, actors tend to emphasize situational causes when explaining their own behaviour. For example, Nisbett, Caputo, Legant, and Maracek (1973) found that participants tended to use more external explanations when explaining their own choice of course

  1. Pro and Anti Social Behaviour

    The need to help. Compassionate, soft-hearted, tender... Personal distress: concern with one's own discomfort plus the motivation to reduce it. The need to escape the situation. Worried, disturbed, alarmed... Case Study: Batson (1981) Procedure: Devised a situation in which female students observed 'Elaine' receiving mild electric shocks.

  2. Theories of Prejudice

    and will not go anywhere near an edge with a drop is pre-judging that they will not like going near the edge and so has a prejudice about the situation. This is not a bad prejudice to have and could increase safety as the person has not got the risk of falling off of the edge.

  1. Social psychology - Social Interaction Sequence

    to change our attitudes; a deliberate attempt to influence a person's attitude and behaviour YALE MODEL - developed @ Yale Uni during 1950s * The Communicator: popular, attractive, fast-talking communicators are more persuasive. * The Message: one sided message is most effective when the audience agrees with the communicator *

  2. Psychology Questions Ansewered

    This is a methodology question. Weaknesses such as number of participants trouble making generalisations, age group-naturally competitive(tajfel), milgram and zimbardo self selecting -good because they were more willing to participate-students weakness because they are used to obeying authority not true representation of wider society, none ever went to prison- homogenous grouping e.t.c.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work