Has the position of children changed? Or Has the nature of Childhood changed?

Authors Avatar

Has the position of children changed?

Or

Has the nature of Childhood changed?

Childhood is a social construction not a biological stage. The idea of childhood is different in different societies. If childhood was natural then it would be the same experience in every society, but this is not true.

Aries says the childhood did not exist until recently, he says that before industrialisation children were regarded as mini-adults and from early age they worked alongside adults and dressed like adults. Aries says that the idea of childhood started for the majority of people after industrialisation in the 19th century when factory acts made it illegal for children to work in factories and education acts made school compulsory. Children were seen as separate from adults and had their own laws. However Aries can be criticised because people under 12 were not allowed to marry and they must have been seen as adults.

Join now!

Roger says that there are two views on childhood this century. The “innocent child” and the “wicked, sinful child”. Each view suggests a way of treating children either children should be protected and cared for so that they have a happy and carefree life or they are naughty and must be restrained and disciplined. In both cases the responsibility of parents.

The 1989 Children act says that the court’s main priority with children must be their own welfare, and this reflects the need to care point of view. However the education system is based on the control of ...

This is a preview of the whole essay