• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effective is the levels of processing model as an explanation of memory?

Extracts from this document...


Psychology Essay. How effective is the levels of processing model as an explanation of memory? Craik and Lockhart believe that the memory is one single unit and cannot be broken down into short-term memory and long-term memory. The idea is that our ability to remember depends on how deeply we process and encode information. We process information in three different depths, from shallow to very deep. The shallowest level of processing involves the structural pattern of a word or number (what the word or number looks like). As we recognise a continual pattern of what the word sounds like, we process it more deeply. It is only when we can give meaning to the word that we will be at the deepest level of processing. This kind of processing leaves the most lasting memory trace. ...read more.


This theory has lead to hundreds of experiments, much of which support the theory that semantic research is the best way to process information into memory. The model also has practical applications that work such as suggesting ways to improve our memory. However, there are more criticisms and limitations than support for this model of memory. Words that require deeper processing also require more effort to process. It could be the processing that increases remembering abilities. Deeper processing also takes much more time and it could be the amount of time that passes which increases recall and not rehearsal. The model doesn't explain why deeper processing helps improve memory; it just states that it does. Eysenck argues against the material that is used to test the shallow processing. He believes it is not distinctive and that is why it is not remembered as well. ...read more.


Shallice and Warrington used a case of a motorcycle accident victim to question Atkinson and Shiffrin's multi store model. The victim's short-term memory was affected and he could only remember two new things at a time, but yet they still managed to enter his long-term memory. Baddeley and Hitch suggested the working memory model where information had several different ways of being encoded into long-term memory. This model is more stable than the multi store and levels of processing model. The only problem with this model is it only offers views on the short-term memory store and offers no insight into long-term memory. Yet it does have practical applications, in particular helping us to understand how children learn to read and write. I don't believe the levels of processing memory model is as effective as Baddeley and Hitch's working memory model, yet it does offer some information on how we can improve our memory. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Craik and Lockhart believed that depth is a critical concept for levels of processing ...

    4 star(s)

    with five other names but it would if it was placed with some other foreign words. Encoding in short term memory It is a common idea that short-term memory has less capacity and shorter duration. The concept of 'encoding' is less familiar though.


    They were then escorted out of the classroom with no contact with group 2. Group 2 were the next to be tested. They were told to sit at separated desk, and maintain an absolute quietness. And they were told that "after the words has all been read out, without informing you, music will be played".

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    They were then escorted out of the classroom. All the materials were collected. The recall sheet for the two groups was put into piles, because they will be analysed differently before been compared. 2 days after the recall result was analysed, compared, and a conclusion was obtained, a debriefing sheet was given to each participants that participated.

  2. Levels Of Processing

    He put forward words with different levels of emotional contents (high emotional contents = deeply processed and Low emotional contents = shallowly processed)) to secondary school and university students in order to see which ones would be remembered better. He found out that the words without emotional importance were remembered

  1. How Minority views afects Majority - Conformity

    frustrated, or even give a better answer or they may just give a stupid answer. Ethics The experiment involves quite a lot of ethical issues which need to be identified and resolved. Participants in the experiment should not be affected in anyway and must be left in the same state as before e.g.

  2. Investigating Levels Of Processing Using Images

    This was to ensure that the results were reliable. Although Craik & Lockhart (1986) did tend to neglect independent measures of whether processing was deep or shallow. Recently both psychologists (1990) had updated their model in response to criticisms in research findings.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work