• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How might prejudice develop and how might it be reduced?

Extracts from this document...


Prejudices both social and Individual are an unwanted yet unavoidable trait of modern day society, presenting itself in many different forms such as homophobia, sexism, racism, and even ageism. The word prejudice can be broken down into two parts to decipher its meaning; pre (Before), judice (judgement), and is quite literally that, the first feelings or thoughts about another individual, or group of people, based on the way that they look, and pre conceived ideas as to what that person or group of people will be like, or how they are likely to act. There are said to be three main elements of prejudice which are: Cognitive element - the way we think, Affective element - How we feel, Behavioural element - How we act, these are very basic explanations and an example is needed to explain it in more detail. If a person with very homophobic prejudices saw two same sex individuals showing affection towards one another in a public place the cognitive element explains what that person thinks about the situation which would probably be the inability to understand why they act in this way or perhaps even jealousy of these people because of their comfort with their sexuality. The affective element may cause the individual to experience negative feelings of anger, or disgust towards the couple, and the behavioural element determines the actions that the person might take due to the previous two elements, for example avoidance of the couple, or possibly verbal or even physical abuse. ...read more.


However, the theory doesn't explain how the taunts and manner in which the fans act is started. It explains that everyone acts in the same way by copying, although this suggests that one individual must have started the negative behaviour for everyone else to follow. This leads us to the question: Who starts the taunting, and does that person have a different type of personality as a leader/influential individual, than a person who is influenced/follower? As the social identity theory doesn't fully explain why individuals can have prejudice views without being part of a group, or why some individuals are more prone to prejudiced behaviour than others we must look another theory which goes some way to give explanation as to the reason why some people act differently to others. The Authoritarian personality theory proposed by Adorno et al (1950) is widely regarded as the most influential theory to explain individual differences. Adorno started his research because of his fascination with Nazi behaviour, and wanted to explore the notion that some people are more likely to become prejudiced because of the way that they believe others should behave. Adorno et al created a way to test individuals in order to determine whether or not they had an authoritarian personality, by creating a type of survey which would indicate whether or not the individual who took the test showed signs of four different types of views, and whether they correlated with one another or not. ...read more.


It was also considered that the results may have been true, but also influenced by another method of reduction: Super-Ordinate Goals, and that the combination of the two reduced prejudice significantly. The super-ordinate goals method is basically the suggestion that by putting two different groups of people together into a certain situation, but then making them interact with each other more positively by giving them a common goal in which they must work well together in order to achieve, the individuals will lose some of their inhibitions, thus a reduction in prejudice will occur. This is what is said to have happened during the war, however it could also be said that the joining of these two groups of people to fight against another group is simply the formation of another prejudice towards the opposition, and can be linked in with the Social Identity theory, and the idea that this was merely the merging of two conflicting groups to create a bigger 'in-group', however other studies have proved that this method does work in different types of scenario. As you can see there are a number of different proven methods that can be used in the reduction of prejudice however no single method is a definitive solution to the problem and so to really have an impact they must all be used in conjunction with one another in order to see any positive affects. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Discuss how the primacy effects and recency effects AND central traits might influence impression ...

    They had to come up with words and group A tended to choose more positive traits. He concluded that the first impression was of greatest impact. Luchins in 1957 had participants read a passage about "Jim" in which he was described in an outgoing way and also in a reserved way.

  2. Pro and Anti Social Behaviour

    Outline 2 or more explanations of media influences on anti-social behaviour (12 marks) b) To what extent do research studies support the view that the media are responsible for anti-social behaviour (12 marks) a) Outline and evaluate one or more studies relating to media influences on pro-social behaviour (12 marks)

  1. Theories of Prejudice

    Another theory of prejudice formation is called Realistic Conflict Theory. This theory is based on the idea that in some cases, different groups are in competition for limited resources, such as food, water, and money. They then band together, based on their ethnic heritage, to take what they believe should be theirs.

  2. Theories of Asch and Tajfel

    The following example is a result of a small formal cross-divisional group, which also included an informal group. In the first semester of the second year one of our group members was assigned to a marketing project team. Sam* found out that her marketing group consisted of two GIMML's, two FIMML's and one SPIMML.

  1. Persuasion Theory.

    Yet when surveyed, more than 90 per cent of restaurants and hotels said they would not serve Chinese. The study shows that attitudes may not be a good way of predicting behaviour. This in itself points to a flaw in the Domino model.

  2. Focus Group Research gives the researcher access to tacit, uncodified and experiential knowledge in ...

    Ursin continues this practice further to distinguish between the subjectivity of tacit knowledge and the concept of objective explicit knowledge and how these concepts are internalised or externalised, combined or socialised. TO Tacit Knowledge Explicit Knowledge Tacit Knowledge FROM Socialization Sympathised knowledge Externalization Conceptual knowledge Explicit Knowledge Internalization Operational knowledge Combination Systemic knowledge Nonaka-Takeuchi learning cycle (SECI-model)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work