• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Hypothesis 1 - Participants will have a higher recall in the cued recall condition rather than the free recall condition

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Introduction "The ability to process and retrieve information is known as memory"1. The most influential explanation of memory is Atkinson's and Shiffrin's models of memory. This theory suggests that there are separate memory stores, short term memory (STM) and long term memory (LTM). The basis of the STM store is acoustic where information is processed acoustically, in contrast the LTM store processes information on the basis of the meaning of the material. In other words, meaningless items are incapable of being stored for long durations by the LTM. This idea of separate memory stores has been investigated on several occasions and findings do seem to be consistent. However although this explanation does seem to be empirically supported, most of this evidence were derived from studies where participants were tested under highly artificial conditions. However in every day life memory processes come to us naturally, for this reason the environment we're expected to recall in, is important and thus affects findings. An alternative approach therefore is to emphasize the role of established information as an aid to integrating new information. ...read more.

Middle

It seems that the relevance of the processing is influential. Therefore the present study aims to see what processes are used in memory recall. Hypothesis One Participants will have a higher recall in the cued recall condition rather than the free recall condition. Hypothesis Two METHOD Design The study was a related design experiment, with two conditions testing one independent variable. The participants were required to complete both conditions of the experiment; these conditions were free recall and cued recall of the words. Participants In total there were 12 participants, all of which were psychology students in their first year of their degree. The sample of participants consisted of a mixture of both sexes and all were eighteen plus. The sample was an 'opportunity sample' in which they were the only available participants that were willing to take part. Apparatus and Materials * Participant Response Sheets: These consisted of a list of words that the participant was required to recall in the immediate and cued recall conditions. In addition they were also required to rate the difficulty of the tasks and how surprised they were. ...read more.

Conclusion

(See appendix for a copy of response sheet two) 4. The researcher then, as discretely as possible, prepared response sheet three. This consisted of a list of words that the participant had failed to recall, in which it contained a balanced number of the M words and R words, which the participant had associated with the original list provided. 5. Once response sheet three was prepared the participant was again required to recall the original list of words but this time the researcher had given them a list of cues to help them recall the words. 6. When the participant had completed the cued recall or was unable to recall any further words, the researcher collected their response sheet and thanked them for their time in participating and debriefed them on the purpose of the experiment. 7. The results were then analysed by using a related t test. Ethics Ethically the study is good as no participants are being harmed or deceived during the course of the study. Furthermore participant data was also kept anonymous. RESULTS Surprise 3,4,5 First Recall Cued Recall n 12 12 Mean diff 0.500 1.750 SD of diff 3.451 1.815 t 0.502 3.339 P(2tld) 0.626 0.007 1 Mastering Psychology, Davies, R. Houghton, P. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Experiment to Test Memory Using Recognition and Free Recall.

    Controlled variables - Number of words to be memorised. Time allowed for memorizing. Time allowed for recall. Time between memorizing and recall. Instructions to subjects. Amount, form and position of distractor items. Participants: 20 subjects were used. These were friends and family and therefore not a random sample. They were between the age of 15 and 72.

  2. How interference affects memory recall

    to have better memory recall in both of the conditions, with or without interference. Reliability The study was very reliable as I had very good control over my extraneous variables such as all of the participants had the same amount of time to study the words and same amount of time to recall the words.

  1. Investigate the effects of Imagery on Memory recall: Visual Aid & Memory Recall

    The dependent variable (what is being measured) was the recall from each participant. The confounding variables, variables apart from the independent variables that do affect the dependent variables were noise, surroundings, age, participant reactivity, use of words and images. Though, noise and surroundings may be considered as an extraneous variable.

  2. An investigation about retrieval failure in memory (retrieval cues) whether participants can recall more ...

    The design chosen was independent groups this was because one group had free recall, where as the other group had cued recall. Repeated measures would not be necessary to use in the experiment as the experiment only needs doing once, to do the experiment twice would be too time consuming.

  1. Will participants have a better recall of words when they are presented in an ...

    Again participants were split into two groups. Each group was shown a total of 112 words separated onto four cards. One group had cards on which the words were presented in logical branching diagrams, and the second group had cards on which the words were presented randomly on the branches.

  2. Find out if recall of words is better when recalled in the environmental context ...

    in the same state as when it was learned (Lang, Craske, Brown, & Ghaneian, 2001). According to Smith (1995), the environment has some effect on the direction of mood, and manipulations to the environment affect memory only when the two environments suggest different moods to the person.

  1. An experiment to investigate whether chunking leads to better recall.

    Chunks can be very large so that even though only seven chunks are recalled, allot of information can be stored. The size of a chunk can vary and information is often encoded. The capacity of long-term memory is though to be unlimited, as there is no one alive with a memory so full they could not learn anymore.

  2. Psychology Report

    In this case the distracter task was for the participants to recite the alphabet backwards. Dependent variable (DV) : the percentage of accurately recalled words from the last seven words of the list, showing the recency effect. The conditions used in the investigation: Condition A: Without distracter task, Participants had

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work