• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In relation to Milgrams (1963) study into obedience, describe and discuss the ethical issues of consent, withdrawal from the investigation, and protection of participants. In addition, suggest and discuss how each issue could have been addressed b

Extracts from this document...


In relation to Milgram's (1963) study into obedience, describe and discuss the ethical issues of consent, withdrawal from the investigation, and protection of participants. In addition, suggest and discuss how each issue could have been addressed by the researcher In 1993 the BPS (British Psychology Society) implemented ethical guidelines both physical and psychological. Milgram's experiment was done in 1963, and to date has been one of the most looked at experiments with horrific results. It is essential if anyone was to carry out a psychological experiment involving humans or human behaviour to follow these guidelines. These guidelines ensure psychologists are responsible for the protection of the participants or subjects from harm during and after an experiment, to gain voluntary consent from the participants and allow them to withdraw at any point during the experiment. This raises questions into whether Milgram's experiment would be allowed to take place in modern day. In this essay I will be discussing the problems with the ethics of Milgram's experiment and what ways it could have been improved so that there are less problems with the experiment. Stanley Milgram, a social psychologist, conducted a test to see the obedience towards authority. He set up an experiment with teachers who were the actual participants, and an actor who was the learner. ...read more.


When participants heard the screams of the learner, if they decided they did not want to continue, the man in the lab coat (authority) would say to them one of four things. "Please continue," "The experiment requires that you continue," "It is absolutely essential that you continue," "You have no other choice, you must go on" (Milgram, Stanley (1963). "Behavioral Study of Obedience"). Because of these sayings, it gave no right to withdraw. If any of the volunteers felt as if they couldn't continue because they felt that if they were to kill the person they would be held responsible, the examiner would reply "its my responsibility if anything happens to him" (1974, Milgram, cited - Obedience and Civilization, Mixon).. This may have relived a lot of pressure from the volunteers but nevertheless they all showed signs of distress, not being able to cope with having the death or severe injury of another human being on there conscious. I also believe strongly that there was a money issue involved. A lot of people would continue just to get the money they were working for. If they were to stop, there would be an issue of whether they get there money or not. ...read more.


In my opinion I would say the best thing to do would be to still have the authority figure there but ask them if they wanted to continue. That way it gives the participant a chance to leave if the distress is too much for them. Incorporated into this could be the protection of participants. If the participant was shown signs of distress or clear signs of nervousness, the authority figure would ask if they want to continue. This way its stopping the trauma getting worse and participants don't feel obliged to continue. In conclusion, since young everyone has always listened and been obedient to a figure of authority. Whether that means a child to a parent, or a citizen to the law. Our brains are always going to be programmed to abide by authority. When we talk about the Milgram experiment, we forget that these results also surprised Milgram as well as the general public. Because of this, Milgram did not expect the behaviour and distress that was shown in the experiment "When I posed this question to a group of Yale University students, it was predicted that no more than 3 out of 100 participants would deliver the maximum shock. In reality, 65% of the participants in the study delivered the maximum shocks." Miller, Arthur G. (1986). The obedience experiments: A case study of controversy in social science. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically evaluate whether Milgrams research on obedience was ethical

    4 star(s)

    Although they volunteered to take part, the true purpose of the research was not revealed until after their participation. In the case of Milgram's experiment, it clear that the research would have had no value as the obedience levels could not have been accurately recorded had the participants been aware of the specific details.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    SA - Milgram - 1963

    3 star(s)

    * Teacher had to read out the voltage to the learner each time they were about to give a shock. * If the teacher asked for advice/wanted to stop, experimenter used 4 prods.

  1. Evaluation of Milgram's Obedience Study

    Milgram disagreed saying that deception is needed for the experiment to work. He debriefed all the participants afterwards and he could not predict their reaction. During and after an experiment the participant must have the right to withdraw. They should be able to leave the experiment at anytime and they can request to have their data removed from the experiment.

  2. Describe and Evaluate Milgram's (1963) experiment

    were agonising screams,300volts learner refused to answer and the experimenter ordered participants to give the shocks).The responses were all the same in order to get fair reaction from participant.

  1. Is Milgrams study on obedience more or less ethical than Hoflings?

    Milgrams participants were further deceived during his experiment. They were informed that the shocks and the victims were real; similarly, in the Hofling experiment, as well as being unaware of their part in the experiment, the participants were deceived with a placebo drug.

  2. Psychology Questions Ansewered

    Remember this is the projector and the mirror. Samuel and Bryant Children qualitatively think different from adults (Remember this was not falsified by Samuel and Bryant) Child response changes as children increase in age (Remember the results showed that as they aged the children's responses began to change)

  1. Outline and evaluate research (theories/studies) into life changes as a source of stress (Holmes ...

    Milgram used four prods when pps asked to withdraw that even included "you have no choice". If pps think they are being forced into inflicting pain on an individual, this is clearly going to be distressing. Even when Milgram argued there was no way he could have predicted some of

  2. The Milgram Stanley 1963 Behavioural Study of Obedience

    All 40 participants continued to a 300 volt stage, with 26 (65%) of them continuing right through to the end. This concluded that social influences are strong and people follow orders even when this is distressing to them. This high level of obedience was not predicted.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work