• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In the early years of the Second World War large numbers of British people were evacuated from their homes. Explain the reactions of the British people to the evacuation policies of the government.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In the early years of the Second World War large numbers of British people were evacuated from their homes. Explain the reactions of the British people to the evacuation policies of the government. On 1st September 1939, the British government introduced its evacuation policy. This policy was to evacuate millions of people in society who were in greatest risk from the German bombing. For evacuation purposes the Government divided the British Isles into three areas: Evacuable- (usually the larger urban cities, London & Birmingham.) Neutral- (as the chance of bombing there was less.) Reception areas- (rural settings thought to be the safest from German air attacks.) Nearly one and a half million people moved in September 1939, most moved within one weekend. However German bombing didn't come when expected due to the 'Phoney War' so nearly half used it as an excuse to come back and later had to be re-evacuated in autumn 1940, when the bombing finally started. People's reactions to the evacuation varied according to their individual status and situation. As about 13 million people lived in the evacuable areas and there was only enough room in the reception areas for 4.8 million people, so only certain groups of people could be moved. ...read more.

Middle

There was a great disadvantage to children not being evacuated as a community or a school since it made the experience that more daunting. As a result of the mis-matches in reception areas, selection was made according to rudimentary principles. Billeting officers simply lined the children up and invited the potential hosts to take their pick. Thus the phrase 'I'll take that one' became etched on the memory of evacuees. This was a traumatic experience for the minors as those that looked unhealthy, poor or dirty were left until the very last. A man remembers him and his sister going through this ordeal 'we were left until the very last. The room was almost empty. I sat on my rucksack and cried.' These children would have felt isolated and lonely, as they did not know their fellow evacuees or their new hosts. They also had the added pressure of making new friendships. However, friendships did form- not only amongst the evacuees from the urban areas but new bonds between the urban and rural children. Each child learnt a new way of life, the city children learnt the ways of the countryside, one child wrote back to his mother 'They call this Spring, Mum, and they have one down here every year.' ...read more.

Conclusion

These are the people that were exposed to the trauma of separation, isolation, the tensions of fear and anger. Most mothers were unaware of where their children were going, what they would be doing and all were wholly ignorant of when they would be coming back. The policy of evacuation also had a long-term effect on the country's development. As most evacuees were children from poor areas taken in by middle- class families, the huge gulf between the social classes was bought into focus and highlighted. Evacuation seems to have played a significant part in shaping the deep- felt desire to create a fairer society when the war was over. The problems that were raised by the evacuations pointed out weaknesses in public conditions and the urban working- classes own living conditions. This provided the incentive for post-war reforms in areas such as national health, housing and adequate supplies of nutritional food. Today as a result of these reforms there is the National Health Service (NHS), new housing full of modern amenities, and today there are excessive amounts of food available for all civilians. By Katie Matthews - 1 - Dunottar School ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Developmental Psychology essays

  1. I have decided to do my portfolio on Beaufort Park School, for several reasons. ...

    This is assessed. * Self management: Fair Funding builds on the familiarity of the LMS by allowing schools to expand their capacity for self government further, via an increased allocation of responsibility and funding. * Opportunity: Fair Funding is not a threat to schools, but is an opportunity.

  2. Attachment and Separation.

    As with the first paper, many members of the British Psychoanalytic Society voiced strong disagreement. Donald Winnicott wrote to Anna Freud: "I can't quite make out why it is that Bowlby's papers are building up in me a kind of revulsion although in fact he has been scrupulously fair to me in my writings".

  1. Is the landowner the driving force in urban redevelopment?

    However the third question is less elegantly resolved and, in failing to formulate a powerful causal logic as to the actions of brownfield landowners, their argument is dogged by many of the same flaws that have hitherto impeded the effectiveness of other structure/agent models of the development process (see for example Hooper, 1992).

  2. Britain in the second World War: the Evacuation of British Children

    safety of the children, because of this the Government would like the evacuation as they may gain more votes for upcoming elections. The Government would also welcome the evacuations because these children were the future, no one knew how long the war would go on for and these children could eventually be fighting the Germans.

  1. What Were The Differing Reactions In Britain To The Policy Of Evacuating Children During ...

    The vast majority of parents were now all for evacuation and were just happy to see their children set off safe and well. As some children were sending back letters to their parents informing them of how much they were enjoying the experience and how well they were being treated

  2. Second world war evacuation.

    They're all carrying big bags, rather than the usual ruck-sack-type school bag. However, because of the sheer scale of the evacuation operation, luggage was indeed limited. Obviously they couldn't take anything other than the essentials and bare necessities. There are many aspects of evacuation that aren't portrayed in this picture.

  1. Why did the British government try to evacuate children from Britain's major cities in ...

    The government made a major effort in trying to persuade parents that evacuating their child was for the best. For example, a 1942 government poster about evacuation shows a mother and her two children in the countryside contemplating on whether she should bring her children back into the city or not.

  2. In response to growing tension and technological advances in war, the British government set ...

    Larger schools were split up into four or five different areas, to minimalize the stress for the receiving authorities- church groups, village councils, and local education authorities.(Gosden,15) The children, upon arriving at their country areas, found that, indeed, the government had not arranged for extra campuses or materials, essential to give the children a less stressful move.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work