Influence of childhood experiences on adult relationships

Authors Avatar

Influence of child relationships and interactions with peers on adult relationships

A01

Shaver et al claimed that three systems during infancy determine what we experience as romantic relationships as adults.  The first system is the internal working model.  According to Bowlby, later relationships are likely to be a continuation of early attachment styles (insecure or secure).  This internal working model can, in extreme cases, cause them to develop an attachment disorder.

Children with attachment disorders may avoid the mutual intimacy of loving family relationships.  The causes are unknown but a common occurrence is abuse or neglect during infancy. They have lacked someone to be close with and thus lack comfort and reassurance at times of stress.  This causes they child to have a disturbed way in relating to others.  This behaviour can spread to peer relations and even romantic relationships in adulthood.

Children’s friendships can act as training grounds for important adult relationships.  Close friendships involve affection, a sense of alliance and intimacy, and having someone to confide in.  Childhood friendships share important characteristics in later romantic relationships.

Join now!

A02

Despite the criticism there has been some good evidence for this theory. The relationship between early attachment style and later relationships was demonstrated by Fraley (1998). .  He conducted a Meta analysis of studies and found correlations between 0.1 and 0.5 between early attachment types and later relationships. He suggested that low correlations are due to the unstable attachment type that is insecure-anxious.  There are however, concerns that an individuals attachment type is determined by the current relationship, and that is why happily married couples are securely attached.

There are issues with gender differences with the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

Avatar

A reasonable attempt to debate some of the research and its findings. An introduction setting the context and place of Bowlby and other theorists in the field of attachment and later relationships would improve the mark on this essay, as well as developing the point when using psychological terms. . 3*