• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14

Investigating the effects of organisation on learning

Extracts from this document...


Investigating the effects of organisation on learning Clive Newstead Abstract Background: Previous research suggests that the organisation of information is integral to its storage in and recall from memory. Aim: Differences with regard to the use of categorisation of information have been observed between cultures and age groups, so the aim is to find out the degree to which categorisation affects the learning of information in 16-18 year olds. Method: 20 participants aged 16-18 had 60 seconds to learn as many words as they could from a grid containing 24 words. The grid contained 6 words in 4 different semantic categories and was either categorised (control) or randomised (experimental). Participants then recalled as many of the words as they could. The amount of words that they recalled was observed. Results: The difference in the number of words remembered between the two conditions was found to be insignificant when put to the independent t-test and tested at the 0.05 level. In fact, participants in Condition B (randomised) recalled more words on average than those in Condition A (organised). However, participants in Condition B showed 68.83% categorisation upon recall, compared with 0.5% that would have been shown if participants recalled the words in the order that they appeared on the radomised grid. Conclusion: The results suggest that the degree of organisation of information upon presentation does not affect the amount of information remembered. However, the actual process of mentally organising the information may be a significant factor in the amount of information remembered. Individual differences may affect the way the information is organised, but this study found that categorical organisation was the most common form of this. Introduction Much evidence suggests that information in memory is highly organised, and that we remember large amounts of information by associating it with other similar pieces of information already stored. It may even be that the organisation of information is a prerequisite for information to be stored; for example, Mandler (1967) ...read more.


Also interesting was the distribution of recalls by category: colours were recalled the most frequently (85/120), compared with sports and animals (both 77/120) and, least frequently, countries (64/120). There could be several explanations for this, but it appears to constitute primarily of two factors: the frequency of usage, and the size of the categories' domains. For example, colours are frequently used words and there are relatively few words that fall under that category; sports and animals are also categories from which often-used words are drawn, but there are many more words that fit into them than there are for colours; and countries are less frequently-used words. Therefore, a decrease in common usage and an increase in size may lead to proactive interference, causing more confusion and, occasionally, incorrect words to be recalled. This is demonstrated, for example, in that the word America was recalled three times despite it not being on any of the lists (see Appendix 1). In the results from Condition B, there is also evidence that primacy and recency may have occurred. Respectively, green and dog are the first and last words on the grid, and they were recalled by 10 and 9, respectively, of the 10 participants in that condition. No such effect was found, however, in Condition A, suggesting that the order in which words are sequenced has little effect if there is a more significant method of organisation present (in this case, categories). These patterns indicate that organisation is the key factor in remembering information, but at any one time there may be several methods of organisation occurring simultaneously, such as the words' semantic categories, the order that the words are written down, and the frequency of the words' usage, among others. This study did, however, have limitations; the most prominent of which is the potential lack of population validity as a result of the relatively small sample size used and the highly restricted age group from which participants were drawn. ...read more.


This eliminated any patterns, specifically semantic patterns, that may have arisen through manual randomisation. green horse tennis Uganda cow bird chimpanzee England cat China golf Finland red swimming white yellow badminton purple blue Germany football Australia rugby dog Appendix 5: Random word order script source code This script, whose source code is shown in a monospace font, was used in order to eliminate any chance of a pattern occurring accidentally as a result of human error. Line numbers are shown on the left. The script is written in PHP and can therefore be executed by embedding it in a HTML page on a PHP-compatible server, or otherwise by using a PHP compiler. 1: $wordid = array(); 2: $output = array(); Lines 3-12 put all integers from 1 to 24 in a random order in the array $output. 3: for($i = 1; $i <= 24; $i++) { 4: $wordid[] = $i; 5: } 6: 7: for($j = 1; $j <= 24; $j++) { 8: $key = mt_rand(0, count($wordid) - 1); 9: $output[] = $wordid[$key]; 10: unset($wordid[$key]); 11: sort($wordid); 12: } Lines 13-33 convert the numbers in $output to words. Line 15 avoids ambiguity between, for example [14] and [1][4]. E.g. [3] becomes [03]. Line 31 replaces the numerical values from $rep_num with the corresponding words in $rep_word and adds them to the final word list. 13: foreach($output as $num) { 14: 15: if($num <= 9) { $num = "0" . $num; } 16: 17: $rep_num = array( 18: "01", "02", "03", "04", "05", "06", 19: "07", "08", "09", "10", "11", "12", 20: "13", "14", "15", "16", "17", "18", 21: "19", "20", "21", "22", "23", "24" 22: ); 23: 24: $rep_word = array( 25: "football", "rugby", "tennis", "badminton", "golf", "swimming", 26: "bird", "cat", "dog", "horse", "cow", "chimpanzee", 27: "England", "Germany", "China", "Uganda", "Australia", "Finland", 28: "red", "green", "blue", "purple", "yellow", "white" 29: ); 30: 31: $wordlist .= str_replace($rep_num, $rep_word, $num) . " \n"; 32: 33: } Line 34 displays the randomised word list. 34: echo $wordlist; ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Primacy and Recency effect

    and the last 10 words (positioned from 21-30) of a list will have a higher recall than the middle 10 words (positioned from 11-20) The null hypothesis for this experiment which stated that: There will be no significant difference in the words recalled wherever the words are positioned in a list.

  2. Memory.This experiment studies the effects that organised and unorganised lists have on the performance ...

    Once participants had completed reading instructions the test of free recall was given. Following this a verbal debriefing was given (Appendix 4).

  1. Investigate into the Primacy and Recency effect

    This test was chosen as, firstly the investigation was of an independent measures design, as different participants were used in each condition. In addition the investigation was looking for a difference in the recency effect from the two conditions. The value of both N1 and N2 was 20 (number of participants in each condition).

  2. The effect of primacy and recency on recall

    He found that nouns, which were presented towards the beginning and the end of the list, were recalled greatest and recall of words in the middle of the list tended to be less. From his findings he was able to draw the conclusion that when individuals recall information from a

  1. Memory and Mental Imagery

    Other limitations to the results may be that some participants may have been more familiar with the use of mental imagery than other and therefore found it easier to imagine the word pairs interacting with one another. This is certainly a extraneous variable in the case of the control group.

  2. An investigation to discover the effects of retroactive interference on memory recall.

    The experiment would have to take place in this same room for all the participants in order to keep the experiment fair and reliable.

  1. Summarise the aims and context of Bennett-Levy &amp;amp; Marteau (1984) Fear of animals: What ...

    Bennett-Levy & Marteau support this idea and found that patients with a phobia often described what they feared about the animals focussed on what they looked like. Seligman's concept of biological preparedness offered no suggestion about the mechanism by which such preparedness would operate.

  2. Evaluate 3 Approaches to treating Mental Disorders: Psychodynamic, Biological and Behavioural Approach.

    integrates the autonomic nervous system and plays a part in stress and emotion. 2. Neurons are electrically excitable cells that form the basis of the nervous system. The ï¬exibility of the nervous system is enhanced by having many branches at the end of each neuron called dendrites, so that each neuron connects with many others.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work