• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14

Investigating the effects of organisation on learning

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Investigating the effects of organisation on learning Clive Newstead Abstract Background: Previous research suggests that the organisation of information is integral to its storage in and recall from memory. Aim: Differences with regard to the use of categorisation of information have been observed between cultures and age groups, so the aim is to find out the degree to which categorisation affects the learning of information in 16-18 year olds. Method: 20 participants aged 16-18 had 60 seconds to learn as many words as they could from a grid containing 24 words. The grid contained 6 words in 4 different semantic categories and was either categorised (control) or randomised (experimental). Participants then recalled as many of the words as they could. The amount of words that they recalled was observed. Results: The difference in the number of words remembered between the two conditions was found to be insignificant when put to the independent t-test and tested at the 0.05 level. In fact, participants in Condition B (randomised) recalled more words on average than those in Condition A (organised). However, participants in Condition B showed 68.83% categorisation upon recall, compared with 0.5% that would have been shown if participants recalled the words in the order that they appeared on the radomised grid. Conclusion: The results suggest that the degree of organisation of information upon presentation does not affect the amount of information remembered. However, the actual process of mentally organising the information may be a significant factor in the amount of information remembered. Individual differences may affect the way the information is organised, but this study found that categorical organisation was the most common form of this. Introduction Much evidence suggests that information in memory is highly organised, and that we remember large amounts of information by associating it with other similar pieces of information already stored. It may even be that the organisation of information is a prerequisite for information to be stored; for example, Mandler (1967) ...read more.

Middle

Also interesting was the distribution of recalls by category: colours were recalled the most frequently (85/120), compared with sports and animals (both 77/120) and, least frequently, countries (64/120). There could be several explanations for this, but it appears to constitute primarily of two factors: the frequency of usage, and the size of the categories' domains. For example, colours are frequently used words and there are relatively few words that fall under that category; sports and animals are also categories from which often-used words are drawn, but there are many more words that fit into them than there are for colours; and countries are less frequently-used words. Therefore, a decrease in common usage and an increase in size may lead to proactive interference, causing more confusion and, occasionally, incorrect words to be recalled. This is demonstrated, for example, in that the word America was recalled three times despite it not being on any of the lists (see Appendix 1). In the results from Condition B, there is also evidence that primacy and recency may have occurred. Respectively, green and dog are the first and last words on the grid, and they were recalled by 10 and 9, respectively, of the 10 participants in that condition. No such effect was found, however, in Condition A, suggesting that the order in which words are sequenced has little effect if there is a more significant method of organisation present (in this case, categories). These patterns indicate that organisation is the key factor in remembering information, but at any one time there may be several methods of organisation occurring simultaneously, such as the words' semantic categories, the order that the words are written down, and the frequency of the words' usage, among others. This study did, however, have limitations; the most prominent of which is the potential lack of population validity as a result of the relatively small sample size used and the highly restricted age group from which participants were drawn. ...read more.

Conclusion

This eliminated any patterns, specifically semantic patterns, that may have arisen through manual randomisation. green horse tennis Uganda cow bird chimpanzee England cat China golf Finland red swimming white yellow badminton purple blue Germany football Australia rugby dog Appendix 5: Random word order script source code This script, whose source code is shown in a monospace font, was used in order to eliminate any chance of a pattern occurring accidentally as a result of human error. Line numbers are shown on the left. The script is written in PHP and can therefore be executed by embedding it in a HTML page on a PHP-compatible server, or otherwise by using a PHP compiler. 1: $wordid = array(); 2: $output = array(); Lines 3-12 put all integers from 1 to 24 in a random order in the array $output. 3: for($i = 1; $i <= 24; $i++) { 4: $wordid[] = $i; 5: } 6: 7: for($j = 1; $j <= 24; $j++) { 8: $key = mt_rand(0, count($wordid) - 1); 9: $output[] = $wordid[$key]; 10: unset($wordid[$key]); 11: sort($wordid); 12: } Lines 13-33 convert the numbers in $output to words. Line 15 avoids ambiguity between, for example [14] and [1][4]. E.g. [3] becomes [03]. Line 31 replaces the numerical values from $rep_num with the corresponding words in $rep_word and adds them to the final word list. 13: foreach($output as $num) { 14: 15: if($num <= 9) { $num = "0" . $num; } 16: 17: $rep_num = array( 18: "01", "02", "03", "04", "05", "06", 19: "07", "08", "09", "10", "11", "12", 20: "13", "14", "15", "16", "17", "18", 21: "19", "20", "21", "22", "23", "24" 22: ); 23: 24: $rep_word = array( 25: "football", "rugby", "tennis", "badminton", "golf", "swimming", 26: "bird", "cat", "dog", "horse", "cow", "chimpanzee", 27: "England", "Germany", "China", "Uganda", "Australia", "Finland", 28: "red", "green", "blue", "purple", "yellow", "white" 29: ); 30: 31: $wordlist .= str_replace($rep_num, $rep_word, $num) . " \n"; 32: 33: } Line 34 displays the randomised word list. 34: echo $wordlist; ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Primacy and Recency effect

    and the last ten 10 words (21-30) in a word list containing 30 words See appendix 6 for calculation of the mean The mean recall rate for the first ? of the words from the word list (1-10) (Primacy) The mean recall rate for the second ?

  2. Images are recalled better than words

    told however some of the participants are psychology students and have some idea of what the experiment is about. I am conducting a lab experiment because they are the only means by which cause and effect can be established. Because it involves the deliberate manipulation of one variable, while trying to keep all other variables constant.

  1. Stroop Effect

    Also the reliability could be a problem. Not all the participants showed the Stroop affect. This means that some people are not affected that much by interference and can ignore autonomous processing. The research was conducted using opportunity sample. A limitation of the experiment would be the population validity; this study cannot be generalised to a greater population.

  2. The Effect Of Conceptual Hierarchies On Memory Recall

    The duration can be a few minutes or a lifetime. Atkinson and Shiffron (1968) extended James's study and came up with the very influential multi store model. They suggested a sensory memory referring to sensory information from the environment. Data enters the sensory store, the information we pay attention to

  1. Cue dependent Forgetting. This experiment investigates Tulvings theory of cue dependent forgetting, with ...

    However, this could pose ethical issues which could also reduce its validity. Since all participants were psychology students who have studied cue dependent forgetting, they may establish demand characteristics where they were predisposed with expectations and anticipations. This could lead to participants making less effort in performing the task of recalling.

  2. The Stroop Effect

    still the same or similar; it was found that most people cannot control the automatic process of reading. My research also agrees with Schiffrin and Schneider (1977) who claimed that automatic process are inflexible; as they have already been learnt they are difficult to change.

  1. Carry out an experiment on participants to investigate proactive interference on memory recall, using ...

    The process goes forward and recent information has trouble consolidating due to familiarity with long term memory the brain is comfortable with. An example of this is learning to play netball after having basketball in your long term memory. Evidence of this theory is provided in McGeoch's 1942 study to support proactive interference.

  2. Evaluate 3 Approaches to treating Mental Disorders: Psychodynamic, Biological and Behavioural Approach.

    integrates the autonomic nervous system and plays a part in stress and emotion. 2. Neurons are electrically excitable cells that form the basis of the nervous system. The ï¬exibility of the nervous system is enhanced by having many branches at the end of each neuron called dendrites, so that each neuron connects with many others.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work