• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Investigation to see which of the two interference methods, playing video games or listening to music, has more of an effect on recall.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Psychology coursework Introduction: An investigation will be conducted to see how different types of interference affect recall and which types of interference have the bigger effect. In 1959, Peterson and Peterson set up an experiment to prove that information not being rehearsed would be lost from short term memory. In the experiment, Peterson and Peterson used what is known as the Brown-Peterson technique. On each trial, participants were presented with a trigram consisting of three consonants, which they knew they would be asked to recall in the correct order. The participants counted backwards in threes from a random 3-digit number between the initial presentation of the trigram and the time when they were asked to recall it. This was done to prevent rehearsal of the trigram, because rehearsal would have improved performance by keeping information in short term memory. They found that there was a rapid increase in forgetting from short term memory as the time delay increased. After 3 seconds 80% of the trigrams were recalled, after 6 seconds 50% were recalled, and after 18 seconds fewer than 10% of the trigrams were recalled. The findings from this study suggest strongly that information held in short term memory is lost rapidly when there is little or no opportunity to rehearse it; therefore, information in short term memory is fragile and easily forgotten when being interfered with. Rationale: The study suggests that information is lost easily from the short term memory if it is not being rehearsed and that rehearsal of the information would lead to it being stored in the more stable long term memory. ...read more.

Middle

They all played the video game at the same time, since the console allows for up to sixteen players, for two minutes. * The group were then given a piece of paper and a pen each and were asked to write down as many words as they could remember. * Having done this, the video game participants were de briefed and thanked for participating; they were then allowed to leave and the results were recorded onto a pre-drawn table. * The music group were called in and were read the same brief sheet and a slightly different instruction sheet which instructed them about listening to music rather than playing video games. * They were given the same list of words and looked at them for one minute; they then listened to music for two minutes. They then wrote down as many words as they could remember on a piece of paper. * The music group was then debriefed and thanked like the video game group and were free to leave and the results were recorded onto the pre-drawn table. * The control group were then called in and given the same brief as the other groups; they were then given instructions that outlined they would be sitting in silence for two minutes after looking at the list of words. * After looking at the same list of words as the other groups for one minute, the control group then wrote down as many words as they could remember on a piece of paper. ...read more.

Conclusion

This may be due to the fact that playing video games requires active participation and more concentration than listening to music which is why the results have turned out as they have. These findings do back up Peterson and Peterson's study as they too found that recall was affected by the interference (counting backwards in threes) and that information is lost easily from short term memory if not rehearsed. Generalisability - the study does not allow for a full generalisation about the population to be made simply because the sample is too small and since the participants were selected at random, there is no possibility of generalising about a particular section of the population. However it is unlikely that significantly different results would be achieved if the rest of the population was sampled as memory is a feature everyone possess apart from those who have suffered from brain damage; therefore, on average, it would be expected that the results would be similar. The use of stratified sampling would have enabled generalisations to be made about particular sections of the population. Applications to everyday life - an application of this study could be when someone is trying to memorise a passage of script for a drama performance; whilst trying to rehearse it, he/she could be distracted by other things going on such as noise from other members of the cast or by something else. This would lead to lower recall as he/she had her rehearsal interfered with when trying to memorise the script. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. SHORT TERM MEMORY

    To Participants: Write down any words you can recall from the list in any order. ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ APPENDIX 6 DEBRIEFING SHEET BRINSWORTH SIXTH FORM COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY DEBRIEFING SHEET Name

  2. An experiment to investigate the effect of interference on memory recall

    This is known as interference and there are two kinds, Retroactive Interference and Proactive Interference. B Woods (04) defines Retroactive Interference; "Retroactive interference occurs when information you have received recently interferes with your ability to recall something you learned earlier."

  1. Primacy and Recency effect

    This would be interesting as it would show the experimenter whether the accuracy of memory differs between boys and girls. These variables could be altered in order to make sure that equal number of boys and girls are chosen to participate in the experiment.

  2. "An experiment to see the effect of chunking on short-term memory recall".

    This is shown initially by the average score calculated in the table above. This shows that with Test A on average the score on the memory test was 7.2. This test used the chunked words which were triograms, and this shows that when the letters were chunked the memory was improved.

  1. Describe the application of behaviorist perspectives in health and social care. Describe the application ...

    Also the intellectual development may not be sufficient as thinking for themselves may become difficult due to always being told what to do and having a low self esteem.

  2. Psychology Retrospective Interference coursework

    However, laboratory experiments are artificial so it may generate demand characteristics and alter the way the participants behave. Therefore, findings of laboratory experiments lack ecological validity and are considered difficult to generalize in the real world. Nevertheless, laboratory experiments are easy to replicate and the experimenter is able to manipulate

  1. How interference affects memory recall

    way to see a difference between interference and no interference as I have all the factors needed e.g. participants and easy access to the participants. I chose those words as I thought they are simple words of things that we use in everyday life.

  2. The effect of primacy and recency on recall

    either at the beginning and end or middle of a block of 16. The beginning and end of the block are defined as positions 1-4 and 13-16. The middle of the block is defined as positions 5-12. The dependent variable was how many products were recalled successfully by participants, out of the potential 16 adverts.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work