• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Investigation to see which of the two interference methods, playing video games or listening to music, has more of an effect on recall.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Psychology coursework Introduction: An investigation will be conducted to see how different types of interference affect recall and which types of interference have the bigger effect. In 1959, Peterson and Peterson set up an experiment to prove that information not being rehearsed would be lost from short term memory. In the experiment, Peterson and Peterson used what is known as the Brown-Peterson technique. On each trial, participants were presented with a trigram consisting of three consonants, which they knew they would be asked to recall in the correct order. The participants counted backwards in threes from a random 3-digit number between the initial presentation of the trigram and the time when they were asked to recall it. This was done to prevent rehearsal of the trigram, because rehearsal would have improved performance by keeping information in short term memory. They found that there was a rapid increase in forgetting from short term memory as the time delay increased. After 3 seconds 80% of the trigrams were recalled, after 6 seconds 50% were recalled, and after 18 seconds fewer than 10% of the trigrams were recalled. The findings from this study suggest strongly that information held in short term memory is lost rapidly when there is little or no opportunity to rehearse it; therefore, information in short term memory is fragile and easily forgotten when being interfered with. Rationale: The study suggests that information is lost easily from the short term memory if it is not being rehearsed and that rehearsal of the information would lead to it being stored in the more stable long term memory. ...read more.

Middle

They all played the video game at the same time, since the console allows for up to sixteen players, for two minutes. * The group were then given a piece of paper and a pen each and were asked to write down as many words as they could remember. * Having done this, the video game participants were de briefed and thanked for participating; they were then allowed to leave and the results were recorded onto a pre-drawn table. * The music group were called in and were read the same brief sheet and a slightly different instruction sheet which instructed them about listening to music rather than playing video games. * They were given the same list of words and looked at them for one minute; they then listened to music for two minutes. They then wrote down as many words as they could remember on a piece of paper. * The music group was then debriefed and thanked like the video game group and were free to leave and the results were recorded onto the pre-drawn table. * The control group were then called in and given the same brief as the other groups; they were then given instructions that outlined they would be sitting in silence for two minutes after looking at the list of words. * After looking at the same list of words as the other groups for one minute, the control group then wrote down as many words as they could remember on a piece of paper. ...read more.

Conclusion

This may be due to the fact that playing video games requires active participation and more concentration than listening to music which is why the results have turned out as they have. These findings do back up Peterson and Peterson's study as they too found that recall was affected by the interference (counting backwards in threes) and that information is lost easily from short term memory if not rehearsed. Generalisability - the study does not allow for a full generalisation about the population to be made simply because the sample is too small and since the participants were selected at random, there is no possibility of generalising about a particular section of the population. However it is unlikely that significantly different results would be achieved if the rest of the population was sampled as memory is a feature everyone possess apart from those who have suffered from brain damage; therefore, on average, it would be expected that the results would be similar. The use of stratified sampling would have enabled generalisations to be made about particular sections of the population. Applications to everyday life - an application of this study could be when someone is trying to memorise a passage of script for a drama performance; whilst trying to rehearse it, he/she could be distracted by other things going on such as noise from other members of the cast or by something else. This would lead to lower recall as he/she had her rehearsal interfered with when trying to memorise the script. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. SHORT TERM MEMORY

    To Participants: Write down any words you can recall from the list in any order. ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ APPENDIX 6 DEBRIEFING SHEET BRINSWORTH SIXTH FORM COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY DEBRIEFING SHEET Name

  2. An experiment to investigate the effect of interference on memory recall

    There are also theories to explain forgetting. One of which is the interference theory. This theory suggests that other information that we have previously stored or things we experience whilst trying to remember new information, can weaken our ability to store the new information.

  1. How interference affects memory recall

    In the mean of number of words recalled participants with no interference have a mean of 11.9 where as participants with interference only had a mean of 6.8 which has a difference of 5.1 between them. This shows that interference from music lowers recall of words.

  2. Primacy and Recency effect

    the notes needed to learn placed at the top and at the end of the list which will help recall of information to be improved. As this experiment was a controlled experiment, it may be considered that the results collected are not ecological valid as the results are not collected from a natural environment.

  1. "An experiment to see the effect of chunking on short-term memory recall".

    Ethical considerations These are important to the experiment, as it should be ethical. Firstly informed consent must be given. This is done when the instructions are given out as it explains the experiment fully and the participants are given the option to discontinue with the experiment at any time that he/she feels uncomfortable or upset with what is going on.

  2. Stroop Effect

    This then makes the directional hypothesis acceptable and the null hypothesis unacceptable. Method Design: To support the hypothesis, Stoops experiment was replicated. A laboratory experiment was chosen. This is because a laboratory experiment has a high level of control against confounding variable and conditions can easily be manipulated.

  1. The Effect Of Conceptual Hierarchies On Memory Recall

    This is where the experimenter ensures that no participant is exposed to more than one part of the experiment. This design was applied to reduce fatigue and order effects and also to minimise the chance of a participant double guessing the aim of the experiment and consequently adapting their response.

  2. The Stroop Effect

    Investigator effects will be avoided by creating a set of standardised instructions; this will ensure that the researchers do not treat each participant differently creating less demand characteristics. This research could be considered unethical as the participant doesn't know what they are doing but this will be dealt with by

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work