• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is attractiveness an vital factor in a relationship?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is attractiveness an vital factor in a relationship? What is a relationship? Relationship is a state connection between two people. This relationship can be a casual friendship in the workplace to a romantic relationship. However I'm going to concentrate on romantic relationships. There are many factors which a important in a romantic relation e.g. physical appearance, personality, status and background. In addition it has been said that physical appearance is the first thing we seem to observe when meeting a stranger. Walster and Walster created a The Matching Hypothesis (We are attracted to people who are the same level of attractiveness as ourselves). Walster and Walster (1966) carried an experiment to witness whether the matching hypothesis was accurate or wrong. ...read more.

Middle

So we can conclude that physical appearance is the most important factor in a relation ship. So does this study support the Matching Hypothesis? No because what the experiment is trying to say that we attracted to people who are attractive, however the matching hypothesis says that we are attracted to people who are the same level of attractiveness as ourselves, so it does not support the Matching Hypothesis. The study had received many criticisms. First criticism was that it lacks ecological validity, it is not normal to select a date from a computer, something we would not do when choosing a date. Also because the interaction between the participants was very brief, so participants were introduced to each other any judgments must have been on superficial characteristics again it is not ...read more.

Conclusion

To improve ecological validity they allowed participants to meet beforehand. Results were clear participants who shared similar attractiveness expressed liking to each other. So does this study support the Matching Hypothesis? Yes it does A study which supported the Matching Hypothesis was Murstein (1972). What he did was, photos of couples or engaged couples were ratted in terms of their attractiveness. A clear connection was found of couples of similar attractiveness. So this study is clearly support the fact that we are attracted so someone with the same level of attractiveness as ourselves. However, social desirability could have been involved, because the participants who were rating the photos may have been kind toward the couples, so that they do not look bad. This was also a lab based experiment and may lack ecological validity, this is because the setting is artificial, so therefore finding cant be generalised to other situations. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

The candidate here makes a good effort though the majority the studies are not used accurately enough to sufficiently support their analysis. This is a result of either a poor communication of the study procedures (in the case of Walster ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The candidate here makes a good effort though the majority the studies are not used accurately enough to sufficiently support their analysis. This is a result of either a poor communication of the study procedures (in the case of Walster & Walster, 1966) and their relevance to the question at hand, or a poor use of analytical skills (more on this later). The candidate's execution of the study description is fair but to those who are not familiar with studies like Walster & Walster studies I doubt the clarity of the description. Also, don't ask the examiner questions during the essay - there is no need for them; just write in continuous prose-style.

The candidate's answer trails off a bit towards the end as well, without a really well-formed conclusive paragraph to bookend the essay (the introductory paragraph is good). Also, there isn't a very clear depiction of why the Walster & Walster 1969 study supports the Matching Hypothesis. I recommend just being that bit clearer, particularly in your Quality of Written Communication (QWC).

Level of analysis

The Level of Analysis is not very good. It is limited and shows little range in the candidate's inventory of psychological evaluation. The candidate often comments on the studies' ecological validity when in fact there are a great deal more that they could be talking about. For instance, the mechanisation and reductionism of hugely complex human behaviour to simple quantified processes as a result of the use of computer processing or the experimenter bias in grading each participant's physicality being issues with Walster & Walster 1966. A broader range of evaluation points is required here, and without which the candidate cannot hope to score highly as to use the same few evaluation points for each study only shows a limited awareness of how to evaluate psychology effectively.

Quality of writing

The Quality of Written Communication is average. For the majority it is understandable, but some parts of the essay do not adhere to the proper rules of grammar - "Yes it does (sic)" is not a proper sentence, and neither is "First criticism was that it lacks ecological validity (sic)". Small errors like these do not compromise the clarity of the written expression, but it does lower the QWC mark and may also ultimately give the examiner the impression the candidate is careless with their words and is not really investing their full enthusiasm in their answer.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by sydneyhopcroft 24/08/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. An Investigation to see whether the halo effect is present when rating personality ...

    Method Design- The Independent Variable (IV) is whether participants are presented with the picture of the 'attractive' person or the 'unattractive' person before being asked to rate them on 5 different personality traits. The Dependent Variable (DV) is the overall rating by the participants given to the pictures.

  2. The matching hypothesis

    The co-variance is the male and female scores. All the photos used throughout the procedure are obtained from articles from a local newspaper. After the photos are obtained, record sheets will be produced on which the participants will rate the couples.

  1. Pro and Anti Social Behaviour

    Furthermore, he found that non-violent crime (robbery, burglary, theft) statistics did not follow the same trends. However, this theory is challenged by Baron and Bell (1976) who argued that the theory cannot explain experimental research that has shown that direct temperature itself causes aggression. Evaluation The theory has further inconsistencies.

  2. Psychology, personality & teamwork

    He showed this also by shouting abuse to the England dressing room. Ponting participates in sport because he is always hungry to win matches whether that is against a top team or an average team. He has also got a big competitive streak in him, which you can see because

  1. whether leading questions can affect a person's memory of a question and insert an ...

    The second experiment was designed to test whether the wording caused the participant to recall the accident worse than it was or whether it was response-bias. Students shown a film containing multiple car accidents were either asked the leading question using the word 'hit', 'smashed' or were not asked the question at all.

  2. Anti-Social Behaviour Orders have been promoted as 'mixing the best of the civil and ...

    a road, a council estate. The ASBO is effective for a minimum of two years, and whilst it is a civil order, the breach of an Order is a criminal offence. As such, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the Order has been breached, and if this is done the maximum penalty is five years' imprisonment, a fine of �5,000 or both.

  1. Social psychology - Social Interaction Sequence

    Ex: being asked to try something on without paying, then coming back 1 month later and having larger requests Pregiving the persuader gives a reward before making a persuasive appeal. Ex: being given a holiday if they attend a presentation (advertising condominium sale)

  2. Matching Hypothesis

    Many researchers have tested this theory: Walster (1966) used a "computer dance" as the basis for his research. He got 4 independent judges to rate the attractiveness of 752 students who signed up to this dating service. The students were then matched up at random with the only condition that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work