Is Parental Mental Illness a Risk to Child Development?

Authors Avatar

Is Parental Mental Illness a Risk to Child Development?

        Some argue that Mental illness is a socially constructed phenomenon, whilst others question the mere existence of Mental illness, some arguing that it is merely a consequence on social inequalities.  One can already begin to understand the problematic nature of Mental illness.  What causes more confusion is that ‘Mental illness’ is an umbrella term, covering wide variety of disorders which are very different; they have different symptoms and effects.  Considering there is no known definitive underlying cause of Mental illness meaning the area is still not fully understood, it does not have the same standing as physical illness, coupled with the fact that it is not clearly visible to others means that it can be a great deal harder to deal with, by both the sufferer and their families.        

Research in the area of potential risk to children, requires clearer definitions between the different types of mental illnesses; parents affected by Schizophrenia, personality disorder or depression will each have different symptomatic outcomes, which means the experiences of their children will be different.  

        According to Cleaver et al (1999) a “significant proportion” of children in the child protection system, come from families with domestic violence; drug or alcohol dependence or parental mental illness.  Their research shows, in isolation problem drug or alcohol use or mental illness present little risk of significant harm to children.  Becker and Macpherson (1988) found that common social characteristics found in ‘abusive’ families, other than parental mental illness, included low income; poverty and social exclusion.  Other studies have also shown the link between mental illness and perpetuating factors; Meltzer et al (1995) found that unemployed people are twice as likely as those in full-time employment to suffer neurotic symptoms.  They also found that mental illness was strongly linked with Social Class; the highest rates of neurotic disorder and functional psychoses were found in manual and unskilled occupations.  Whilst Cleaver et al (1999) suggest that social class related factors, including adverse life events, such as sexism; racism poverty and other types of oppression or social disadvantage are in fact themselves factors which can make an individual vulnerable to mental illness.          

Parental mental illness has been stigmatized by society and the media, who tend to concentrate on the negative aspects of mental illness; thus perpetuating negative assumptions, without paying attention to the experiences of the children involved.  Aldridge and Becker (2003) go on to say that negative and damaging associations between children’s experiences and the presence of mental illness in families have been reinforced by medical and social research.  Wahl and Harman (1989) point out that it is very likely that families involved in mental illness will experience stigma, including the children.  Goffman (1963) refers to this as ‘courtesy stigma’.  

Join now!

        It is wrong to assume that mentally ill parents have poor relationships with their children, or that in fact these relationships are damaging to the child.  Although Mental illness has been known to possibly result in parental ‘absence’, where the parent lacks reflexivity and loses their parenting function, whereby perhaps they are unable to be there emotionally for their children.  However, as pointed out by Aldridge and Becker (2003) parental mental illness does not necessarily cause long- term loss of parenting function.

        Interestingly, O’Hagan (1993) believes that where parents have a mental illness, emotional and psychological abuse of children is ...

This is a preview of the whole essay