• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

Memory.This experiment studies the effects that organised and unorganised lists have on the performance of memory recall. Participants were randomly assigned to conduct an experiment using two different methods; words in a random format and in an organis

Extracts from this document...


MEMORY Abstract 1. This experiment studies the effects that organised and unorganised lists have on the performance of memory recall. Participants were randomly assigned to conduct an experiment using two different methods; words in a random format and in an organised format. 2. There were twenty subjects, split into two groups (10 participants in each). They viewed word lists that were the same, using countries only, but they were structurally different (one organised and one unorganised). The participants were than asked to recall the words from the lists. 3. The participants using the organised list did not do as well as expected and the participants that used the unorganised list did better than expected. Surprisingly, the results of the research showed that there was little difference between the two groups, regardless of the organisation. 4. The research did not support the research previously conducted by Bowers et al (1969) 5. The research showed that a larger participant sample, chosen more randomly over a longer period could give better results. Introduction Human memory is similar to computer memory, enabling us to store information for later use. There are two main types of storage for our memory - short-term (STM) and long-term memory (LTM). This course work will only be covering STM, as this is what we will be investigating in this experiment. ...read more.


The purpose of this experiment was to test Bower's findings on his own experiment; the group that produced the best results on recall were the organised word list group. The opportunist sampling of participants were used to test memory. The two groups were tested on their level of recall. By testing exactly, both Independent and Dependant Variables, which needed to be under, exact conditions in a quiet room with no distractions. The experiment conducted in this research study is similar to that of Bower et al (1969), but with the exception of the distraction task. This is to see if organization of words will or will not affect recall of information. Bower et al (1969) conducted an experiment to see whether organisation would affect recall in the short-term memory (STM). He gave his subjects either an organised list of words or a randomised list of words. A distraction task was also given, to ensure that his subjects were using their short-term memory. His test of free recall provided results, showing that the subjects recall from the organised list was greater than that of the randomised list. The aim of this experiment is to prove whether information is easier to remember if in an organised or randomised format. Hypothesis (Null) Differences (if any) in the participants remembering more words from the organised list than the participants remembering words from the unorganised list will be due to chance. ...read more.


Only one person withdrew from the experiment after reading the instructions; claiming to having a bad memory. Results The results from the experiment supported the null hypothesis, as the results were unfounded by the experiment researched by Bowers et al (1969). The findings were that both methods used for the two groups proved that there was little difference - as both sets of results proved to be similar. Appendix 6 shows a frequency polygon graph (showing two sets of data); indicating that overall participants with the randomly selected list of words were more consistent as opposed to the group that had the organised words. An autonomous assumption regarding the experiment could relay that the random list appeared much harder to digest, mentally, therefore more concentration went into studying them and that the organised list may have seemed like more words to remember as the lists were more spread out and separated into categories, thus making the experiment seem more overwhelming. Discussion The results from this experiment do not support Bowers et al (1969) experiment, thus supporting the null hypothesis made at the beginning of this experiment. There was little difference between the participants from both groups. Although the random listed group was more successful and scored more consistently, also proving to be higher in showing the mode, median and mean. Sleep deprivation could be a factor in the group that had the organised list, in that three of the participants were night shift workers. Also, one of the organised group participant's claimed to be dyslexic. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. An experiment to investigate the effect of interference on memory recall

    > The time allocated when recalling the words was the same. > The only interference that occurred was set up by the researcher. > The experiment was carried out before the band rehearsal, to ensure there was no outside noise during the experiment.

  2. Experiment to Test Memory Using Recognition and Free Recall.

    Comments from the subjects, suggests that some syllables were the same or similar to known abbreviations. These could be linked to existing schema and therefore processed more deeply. It was reported by subjects of both conditions that such associations were actively sort after at the time of learning and syllables of this nature were the most easy to remember.

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    The experimenter for each group would read them out. This list included words that sounded the same and has similar meanings. The 10 words were; log, fast, dog, sign, lip, teeth, last, hip, line, sweet. (See appendix 4). 20 consent forms were needed as participants had to give their consent before participating.

  2. "An experiment to see the effect of chunking on short-term memory recall".

    Null Hypothesis There will be no difference in the recall of chunked words and non-chunked words, and any difference will be due to chance and not due to the fact that the words and chunked or due to some other factor.

  1. Psychology Retrospective Interference coursework

    One of the confounding variables is that it was an independent groups design. This means that each participant in each group experiences only one condition of the independent variable, therefore, controlling individual differences is left to chance.

  2. The Effects of Chunking and Distraction on Short Term Memory Recall

    writing down telephone numbers). This has been termed goal orrientated chunking (e.g. a conscious process) while there is also a perceptual or non-conscious form of chunking (Gobet et al, 2001). This adoption of some form of grouping strategy when presented with unstructured list makes rehearsal easier and utilises primacy and recency effects within groups.

  1. How interference affects memory recall

    to learn the words and they each have the same list to learn, And they have the same amount of time to write down as many words as they can remember.

  2. Evaluate 3 Approaches to treating Mental Disorders: Psychodynamic, Biological and Behavioural Approach.

    due to their inaccuracy. António Egas Moniz discovered the lobotomy in 1935 after successfully snatching out bits of chimpanzee’s brains. It didn’t take long for him to get the message that his revolutionary treatment was not so perfect, in 1944 a rather dissatisfied patient called his name in the street and shot him in the spine, paralysing him for life.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work