Nature vd Nurture argument

Authors Avatar

The Nature Argument

The nature side of the debate states that gender is biological. This would explain the strong relationship between ad person’s sex and their gender. It says that gender is “innate” (present at birth). The theory is that because each sex shares the same physiology and anatomy, they have many psychological traits in common too. In the same way that genetics and hormones determine an individual’s sex, they also determine whether a person will behave in a more feminine or masculine way. Males are born masculine and females are born feminine. In other words, men and women, boys and girls, are naturally different.

The physical differences between males and females (e.g. sex organs) serve an important evolutionary function. They allow females and males to come together and reproduce.

This study is an example of Cross-cultural research- investigations carried out across more than 1 society.

Mead was accused by many that her findings were bias. She apparently exaggerated the similarities between the sexes in the Arapesh and Mundugamor tribes.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        The Nurture argument

Join now!

This side of the argument states that essentially gender is a product of socialisation. It is dependant on environmental experiences. Family upbringing and society’s expectations would therefore play a key role in a person’s gender. This would mean, of course, that most boys learn to behave in masculine ways and most girls learn to behave in feminine ways.

The nurture argument can explain why some people adopt the gender role not expected of their sex. In theory, a feminine boy would have had a set of experiences which have led him to acquire a different set of gender ...

This is a preview of the whole essay