• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Obedience & Conformity: The Situation In Abu Ghraib

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked Obedience & Conformity: The Situation In Abu Ghraib Conformity Over the years, different psychologists have explained conformity in a number of ways. Crutchfield (1995) defined conformity as ?yielding to group pressure? (Richard Gross, 2010). Mann (1969) agreed with Crutchfield?s definition b explained that conformity takes may different forms and all depends on the motives rather than group pressure. Famous social psychologist Zimbardo (1991) definition of conformity as a ?change in belief or behavior in response to real or imagined group pressure when there is no direct request to comply with the group nor any reason to justify the behavior change?. Group pressure seems to be the common denominator when defining conformity. Group pressure is exerted by a chosen group at a given time that is important to the individual; such as significant other, family, peers (membership group), or a group, which the individual doesn?t belong to, but values and admires a person within the group (reference groups). Conformity involves yielding to real or imagined pressures of any group, whether it has majority or minority status (van Avermaet, 1996) Obedience Obedience involves altering your behavior because a figure of authority has told you to. Obedience is an active form of social influence in which it involves an individual in authority requiring us to behave in a particular way in a particular situation. Obedience can be seen as a form of complying with an authority figures orders. ...read more.

Middle

Gustav Le Bon described this process as de-individuation, a state in which an individual in a group loses awareness of themselves as a separate individual. The prison guards de- individuation occurred from the result of them taking on the role of guards and having being in authority over the detainees. (Henry Gleitman et al, 2007) Group Polarization is a tendency for group decisions to be more extreme than the decision that would have been made by any of the group members working as individuals. Group polarization was evident in the Abu Ghraib situation as when one individual from the group came up with a torturing idea the rest followed in his example. A factor leading to group polarization are when people generally try to conform to the other member of the group both in the way they behave and to the attitudes they expressing. (Ibid) The military police were told that the detainees were the worse of the worse and the information they help would save lots of lives and have global impact. (Ghost of Abu Ghraib) The military police feeling that the detainees were against them and were their enemy united them close to each other and felt like this was a justification to their actions. Group members will do what they and to promote the sense of group cohesion, as a result doubt or disagreements are downplayed and enemies are stereotyped e.g. ...read more.

Conclusion

Atkinson et al., 1990) Conclusion Social influence is central to human interaction and communal life. Cooperation, community, altruism and love all involve social influence. Obedience and conformity is learnt from a very young age. We hear or come across commands, instructions, directions and orders everyday. From a young age children and taught to be obedient to their person and teachers. As we grow older we follow orders, rules and instruction at schools, university, workplace and even in public areas. E.g. crossing the road when the green man flashes and smoking in designated areas etc. Conformity is in our everyday life as we go through life whether we are conforming to school uniform, conforming at work or even queuing up in a shop. This has been engraved into us as a part of social influence and social norms, therefore making it easier for us to conform to authority or social influence even in a situation like Abu Ghraib. Zimbardo?s stated that his famous Stanford university experiment was an eye opener for situation like Abu Ghraib and explains how good people turn evil as the ?The Lucifer effect?. Zimbardo argues that good people can turn evil if there is enough social influence and when they are playing a role of authority. ??People are always personally accountable for their behavior.. if the killing can be shown to be a product of the influence of a powerful situation within a powerful system, than its as if they are experience diminished capacity and have lost their free will or their full reasoning capacity??. (Philip Zimbardo, Wired). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Describe and evaluate psychological research into conformity and obedience in humans, and consider ways ...

    4 star(s)

    The results of his prison simulation showed that the situation produced the effects of the people involved and the power of social roles, not their disposition. Obedience is a change in behaviour or attitude due to the presence of, or an order from an 'authority figure'; when people comply and act in response to a direct order from another person.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    "Describe the main features of conformity and obedience analyse two conformity and obedience studies ...

    Current affairs: A good current affair example of conformity could be the incidents which took place in Abu Ghraib which I discussed in detail within task 1.It is possible that not all the soldiers that got involved in these horrendous activities would of done this if they hadn't felt a group pressure to do so.

  1. The Concepts Of Conformity And Obedience

    Stanley Milgram was from a Jewish background, he was intent on seeing how easily ordinary people could be influenced or pressurised into committing acts atrocities like those committed by the Germans in World War 2. He decided to test ordinary Americans from various backgrounds.

  2. Critically Evaluate Research Into Conformity, Compliance and Obedience.

    The na�ve participant was led to believe that just like themselves the confederates were too participants. Asch measured the number of times each participant conformed to the majority view.

  1. Theories On Obedience

    rather than someone who was not. It also is backed up by how people act in social situations, in school as children we are taught to be agentic, to be under the influence and obey the commands of teachers, but as we grow older we are to be more autonomous and to take more responsibility for ourselves.

  2. Why do we obey authority?

    determine who would play the role of Prisoners and who would play the role of Prison Guards. The Prisoners were arrested, charged, and underwent all the usual criminal procedures. They were deloused, strip searched, and given a prison uniform which had a number on the front and back and a manacle on one ankle.

  1. The experiment conducted tested the theory of conformity under the influence of group pressure.

    I have a basic feeling of insecurity" (all Asch,1952:469ff.). Social pressure to conform therefore seems extremely powerful even when only implicit, and powerful enough to make even a balanced personality ("an extremely attractive and bright young man") deny even the evidence of their own eyes.

  2. The aim of this experiment is to find out if people will conform without ...

    (Appendix 4). This was mainly because participants need to be reassured after the experiment. To make sure that they didn't feel under pressure, the experiment was completed alone and in a relaxed environment. They also need to know the full aims and that their responses are expected because conformity is a natural response.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work