• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline 2 or more explanations of human altruism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline 2 or more explanations of human altruism. Batson did one explanation into altruism with his empathy - altruism hypothesis. He stated altruistic behavior was a consequence of empathy. Empathy involved an emotional response that lies constant with someone else's emotional state. He said this involved a number of different components, one being perspective taking, where this involves the ability to take the persons point of view. The second one being Empathic concern where you have compassion for the well being of the person. Finally personal distress where you've experienced a similar situation, but he said self orientated concerns, you'll only try stopping the victim because of your emotional reaction and this is not altruism. The second expiation can be shown from Ciadinis negative state model. He proposed when negative experiences are had, we are motivated to alleviate this buy helping others. This will give oneself a rewarded feeling and destroys the negative state. People learn that in childhood, when you help others it is known as a positive behavior and thus giving oneself a good feeling. ...read more.

Middle

He said they see something of them in someone else and therefore said empathy associated isn't helpless however we have the desire to help ourselves is 'located' in someone else. A limitation for the negative state model is the fact people who are in a good mood could want to help people to keep up their good mood and not let it go. Isen & Levin did a study where participants either did or did not find 10 cents in a phone box and a confederate then dropped paper and they found 84% of people who found the money helped while only 4% of those who found no money helped. This shows the view that altruistic behavior has one function that is egoistic and only relieves a person's negative mood. The second limitation for this is the fact most research of this was carried in out fake settings, and not actually done in a real life setting. Also cultural differences could make a difference as away from the USA in a different country, interdependence could be seen as more of a norm therefore not looking less helpful in that particular region. ...read more.

Conclusion

In the 'personal distress' participants the only ones who took her place were the ones who had watched all 10 trials, while the participants in personal distress who were free to leave just left, using the easy way out. The negative state relief model had Cialdini study into it and did a similar study to Batson and followed the same procedures except he gave the participants a 'bonus' reward of money and thought the high empathy participants would help none the less but found high and low empathy state participants had no difference. Maybe this was because their mood was raised because of the bonus, reducing the willingness to want to help. This study shows if participants experience a mood lift suddenly this affects our motivation to help others to increase the mood as its already been raised. All this research is good however if its not compared to real life situations, this could cause invalidity as its not dealing with real life events. Finally seeing the difference between the models is good to see if there is generally such a thing as selfless behavior, and actually measure the underlying motivation for any behavior observed. Daniel Talbot 6524 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Preventing and Reducing Crime

    3 star(s)

    As with Lombroso's work, the results are correlational and not causal. The causal social factors are minimised whilst maximising other social factors such as stereotyping. The conclusion here is that due to the research being conducted by only Sheldon, its only what he thinks other than having a panel to decide with him.

  2. The Matching Hypothesis

    For example in the day time on weekdays certain types of people are more likely to be at a shopping centre (mothers, pensioners) however on weekends a wider range of people may be at the shopping centre. To ensure this wouldn't happen again if were to repeat the research, I

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work