• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate 2 explanations of forgetting in Long-term memory.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline and evaluate 2 explanations of forgetting in Long-term memory. Interference plays a major part in forgetting in long-term memory. This explanation says that one set of learning interferes with another set and it clears out the memory. In experiments the more similar the information is, the more likely interference will happen. A distinction has been made between two types of interferences. The are proactive and retroactive. The word proactive means when your early/old memories are disrupted or displaced by new information. An example of proactive interference is giving out your old address instead of giving your new or current address. The word retroactive means when later or new memories disrupt with the old memories. An example of retroactive is when you can remember your old new house address and forget the old, as it has been displaced by the new information. ...read more.

Middle

The players who played the least games due to illness seemed to remember more. This suggests that interference and not decay was the main factor. The advantage of this study was that it was a realistic situation. However McGeoch and McDonold also did research about interference. Participants were asked to learn a list of adjectives and set different learning tasks between interval and recall. The forgetting rates increased if the material was to be learnt between interval and recall, were similar to the adjective. This study demonstrated by McGeoch and McDonold, found that forgetting rates increase as the function of similarity of the interfering material, so it is unrealistic. The evidence for interference has mainly came from laboratory studies, which are artificial and designed to produce interference. They have very little relation to what happens in everyday life. Experimental evidence indicates that interference cannot be the complete explanation. ...read more.

Conclusion

When Tulving and Osler investigated retrieval failure, they gave the participants a list of words each which was paired with a weakly connected cue word like city-dirty. When the cue was given e.g. city as a cue for dirty, the recall was considerably better. The evidence for forgetting from long-term memory in the retrieval failure section is that the evidence found supports both theories done by the psychologists. However this study could be argued that the research is lacking in ecological validity as the experiments are set in the laboratory. There has been some evidence from outside the labs, like people attending a school reunion, will sometimes find that retrieval cues trigger memories that they didn't realise they had. The difficulties in trying to research about this theory is that it's not possible to disprove the ideas that long-term memory is pediment. It's possible that information is stored into the long-term memory but it can't always be retrieved until the appropriate cues are given, but this still can't be disproved. Jess McSevney ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. SHORT TERM MEMORY

    These will also be recorded. This investigation will add to the ones conducted already as this should give evidence for Baddeley's research. This showed that short-term memory used acoustic memory, which meant that the recall of the word was due to its sound. This should also add to evidence supporting the Atkinson & Shiffrin theory

  2. Categorisation in Long-Term Memory

    Doing this allows reasonable control of extraneous variables and where the experimenter has a significant amount of control. An independent groups design was most appropriate because it prevents order effects and demand characteristics to a certain extent. There will be two groups, a control group who will be shown a

  1. This study is based on the theory of cue dependent forgetting - more specifically, ...

    The recall in the dining hall is slightly positively skewed while the recall in the classroom is slightly negatively skewed. As the results should be normally distributed, this suggests that either the sample is too small or biased. Relationship of results to hypotheses The alternative hypothesis is most likely to

  2. Cue dependent Forgetting. This experiment investigates Tulvings theory of cue dependent forgetting, with ...

    even they remember the singular form), some words can be easily chunked due to their syllables and synonyms (aiding recall) Evaluation: Problems with generalising raised from using psychology students as subjects because they were predisposed with expectations and anticipations therefore are more able in recalling activity.

  1. Outline and Evaluate Two Explanations of Forgetting.

    Evidence on the effects of interference is considered again later. Evaluation includes the fact that it has little mundane realism and therefore lacks generalisation to real life. It is really a product of the artificial tasks conducted in the laboratory as it is rare in real life that two responses are attached to the excellent criticism.

  2. Psychology Retrospective Interference coursework

    the findings of the experiment and individual differences are difficult to control. One extraneous variable is that participants may understand the instructions differently. This was dealt by having detailed standardized instructions for all participants. If there was any question, the experimenter would be there to answer them.

  1. Cue-dependent forgetting theory by Tulving

    Group two had the greatest improvement. The mean number of the 20 questions correct for this group improved from 0.9 to 10.7. This supports the idea that smells act as a cue to aid memory. A study that refutes Tulving's cue-dependent theory is Underwood (1957); he did a study on

  2. Investigating the effects of organisation on learning

    All raw data and calculations can be found in Appendices 1-3. Discussion Unlike previous research such as that by Bower et al. (1969), who found organisation of information to increase recall, this experiment found that the degree of organisation to which the word grids were presented to participants had little

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work