• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate an alternative to the Multi-store Model of Memory

Extracts from this document...


Outline and evaluate an alternative to the Multi-store Model of Memory There are many different explanations as to how we remember things. One of the most basic is Atkinson and Shiffrin's multi store model of memory. This indicates that you see things, then they go into your short-term memory, and then if they are processed they will go into your long term memory. One of the most important things that influences whether something goes into your long-term memory is rehearsal. If you rehearse things, for example, say things over and over again or keep it in your mind for a longer period of time, then it is more likely that it will go into your long-term memory. Craik and Lockhart put forward the levels-of-processing theory, which is an alternative to Atkinson and Shiffrin's Multi-store Model of Memory, because they felt that rehearsal wasn't enough to get data from STM into LTM. ...read more.


if you can't remember something, don't just rehearse it, memorise the meaning of it. Also, before this theory was put forward, the view was that memory can be explained in terms of structure and rehearsal, so this theory had a major impact. However, there are some criticisms to this theory. For example, it doesn't explain why deeper processing leads to better memory. It's also hard to establish whether a particular task involves shallow or deep processing. Craik and Tulving conducted a study that they used to support the level-of-processing theory. In this experiment, they used semantic processing as a form of deep processing, and the physical analysis of a stimulus to represent shallower processing. They found that words that were semantically processed and therefore deeply processed were remembered better than the words that were shallowly processed. However, the shallow processing task lacked mundane realism and it is not clear that we ever really process information this way. ...read more.


However, as with Craik and Tulving's study, this lacks mundane realism and ecological validity and therefore cannot be generalised to real life situations. In 1977, Morris, Bransford, and Franks found that stored information is remembered only if it is relevant to the memory test. Their participants were tested with a rhyming recognition test in which they were given some words and were then asked which words rhymed with the words previously presented. None of the words on the list were presented in the last test. Participants remembered words that had been processed in terms of their sound (shallow processing) instead of those that had been processed in terms of their meaning (deep processing). This goes against the levels-of-processing theory because that states that deep processing is always better than shallow processing. The reason that shallow processing was better in this case was shallow processing was much more relevant and related to rhyming because it's to do with sound, rather than meaning. However, this experiment lacks mundane realism, as people wouldn't be doing this in real life. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Craik and Lockhart believed that depth is a critical concept for levels of processing ...

    4 star(s)

    This distinction is related to that made by Ryle (1949) between 'knowing that' and 'knowing how'. Declarative knowledge corresponds to knowing that. For example you know that you had roast beef on Sunday or you know that queen Elizabeth is our current monarch.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Describe and evaluate the Multi-store Model of memory.

    3 star(s)

    It also places emphasis on the amount of information that can be processed rather than its nature. Some things are simply easier to remember others, perhaps because they are more interesting, more distinctive, funnier etc. The multi-store cannot account for this.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Describe and evaluate one alternative to the multistore model of memory

    3 star(s)

    In other words, it is possible, for example, to rehearse a set of digits in the phonological loop while simultaneously making decisions about the spatial layout of a set of letters in the visuo-spatial scratchpad. The working memory model appears to have a number of advantages over the simplistic formulation of the Atkinson and Shiffrin concept of STI\A.


    all other aspects of the research which might reasonably affect their willingness to participate. It's a fundamental important part of this investigation because participants are giving their consent to the investigation. People can only take part in this experiment if they give their consent.

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    Deceiving the participants makes them feel devalued. If participants were deceived, and they ended up knowing about it, then they may withdraw their result from the investigation, affecting the overall result, or meaning the experimenter may have to find more participants.

  2. Outline and Evaluate the Multi Store Model of Memory and One Alternative Model

    The main assumption of this model is that there are three separate stores; but most importantly that the short-term memory and long-term memory are entirely separate. Evidence supporting this comes in the form of real life examples, such as H.M., a young man who after undergoing brain surgery (a lobotomy)

  1. Memory's Impact

    Each participant was taken to a classroom to take part in the study on their own, away from the distractions of other students. 4) Participants individually heard the standardised instructions (see appendix for full standardised instructions), here informed consent was given and participants could withdraw if they wished to.

  2. Levels Of Processing

    me to conduct the experiment without too many interruptions, which should help the participants concentrate more on the task and reflect the true abilities of their memory. The experiment will however have low ecological validity. Variables I will have the opportunity to control the external variables such as weather and noise levels.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work