• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate biological explanations of aggression

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline and evaluate biological explanations of aggression The biological explanation of aggression suggests that aggression is caused by genetics, brain structure or bio-chemical influences - hormones such as testosterone and neurotransmitters such as serotonin. It includes only biological factors ignoring environmental, psychological and social factors which are better explained by of the social-psychological explanation. The first theory linking genetics to aggression was Court-Brown's research study. Sandberg was the first to identify the 47 XYY karyotype. Normally every human has 46 chromosomes - 23 from the mother and 23 from the father. When a male, has an extra Y chromosome the 47th chromosome it makes them XYY and this would be a genetic disorder. Court-Brown conducted a longitudinal study on 314 males with XYY chromosome and suggested that males with this chromosome would be better hospitalised 'due to an increased likelihood of aggressive behaviour'. Many institutions took on this idea without further research and as a result many males where hospitalised. This would support the biological view that genetics can cause a person to become aggressive as Court-Brown provided evidence for this, however after further research he further retracted his comments as much of it was based on assumption. Further research into the XYY karyotype found that the only thing that the extra chromosome affected was physical characteristics such as increased height and it did not affect aggressive behaviour in any way. ...read more.

Middle

They may be other factors other that genetics that play a role in aggression for example, a person's up-bringing may cause them to act aggressively or the type of culture they belong to may also play a part so to improve its explanation the genetic theory could input some of these ideas into the theory. Another theory from the biological approach which suffers similar problems like reductionism and determinism is the hormonal/neurotransmitter approach. The approach argues that high levels of the hormone testosterone lead to aggression while low levels of the neurotransmitter serotonin lead to aggression. Wagner et al. did research which supported the link between aggression and testosterone. They castrated mice and found that levels of aggression decreased and that there was also a drop in male typical behaviours such as biting. When the mice received testosterone injections levels of aggression started to increase. This would support the view that levels of testosterone can lead to aggression. Another study in this area was by Harrison, he gave male participants aged 20 -56 testosterone injections and then gave them a frustrating game to play. He noted that aggression did increases in all of the men but to differing extents. Furthermore affects were mainly psychological and there were few physical affects. ...read more.

Conclusion

This would make the explanation deterministic. Brain structure can also play a part in aggression particularly when there is damage to the brain. Phineas Gage is an example of how damage to the brain can cause a individual to behave more aggressively. After an accident involving his head and a tamping iron, Phineas Gage went from being mild-mannered to showing very aggressive behaviour. This suggests that certain parts of the brain can alter aggression. However this is only true of one individual. Gage's case was very unique in that in can never be replicated as it would obviously be unethical and also there will never be an exact case like it. So generalising the findings would be very limited. In conclusion, the biological explanation seems to have a high emphasis on nature and focuses mainly on the biological factors that may cause aggression. Aggression can not be caused by biological factors alone, there must be other influences and explanations as to what causes aggression. The explanation ignores these making it reductionist. It could include psychodynamic causes, social and environmental and also cognitive explanations to further improve on the explanation. Also aggression can not just be put down to one cause - even if a person has high levels of testosterone and low levels of serotonin it does not mean that they are going to behave aggressively. Aggression may also depend on situations and events that occur so it cannot only be put it all down to biological influences. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Summary

This essay has covered most aspects of the biological argument for aggressive behaviour in humans. The writer has cited various studies and has also added some criticism of these. The referencing needs to be improved as well as the introduction. However, the writer has both outlined and evaluated the biological explanation of aggression.

Score 4*

Marked by teacher Linda Penn 05/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Describe and evaluate the research methods used by the behaviourist approach

    3 star(s)

    This was one of the first experiments showing us empirical results in human classical conditioning (which also led to results showing stimulus generalisation and higher order conditioning). They chose Little Albert in a hospital at the age of 9 months, before the experiment he was given some baseline emotional tests, all of which, he showed no fear response.

  2. Psychology First Impression

    and suggest that once one determines they have an acceptable understanding of the information presented to them, they will pay less attention as more information is presented and only recall the first impression. In nowadays 21st century, many society factors have been changed, for example, internet is widely used over

  1. A Replication of the Study by Murstein Investigating the Matching Hypothesis

    If they enquire further as to the aim of the experiment simply reiterate what was stated in the standardised instructions: that you are investigating levels of attractiveness and remind them that they will be debriefed later. Any deception now will be dealt with later in the debriefing session.

  2. Outline and Evaluate Psychological Research into Minority Social Influence

    From this it was concluded that in order for minority social influence to be effective the smaller group must be consistent, and the members of the minority group must be in concurrence with each other. Inconsistent minorities have very little influence over majorities, as the variation makes their opinions appear unfounded.

  1. Discuss and evaluate studies into conformity.

    It was found that 37% of participants conformed and gave the wrong answer. This is compered to 0.7% of people in the controlled conditions. This is a demonstration of normative social influence. Alternatively when the genuine participant was questioned before the confederates there were only 5% of participants who conformed.

  2. Outline and evaluate explanations of obedience

    by introducing policies such as recycling in small stages and slowly building upon them as opposed to introducing everything in one go. In addition to this understanding several explanations of obedience can help people to protect themselves against them, for instance to prevent things such as

  1. Outline and evaluate the effect of cultural influences on gender roles

    Nature refers to Gender being determined by innate factors, while nurture deems culture and social environment as responsible. The cultural perspective suggests that a persons gender is due completely to the environment they grow up in, that is, nurture. Therefore, the cultural approach only supports the nurture side of the

  2. The learned helplessness theory of depression.

    doesn't fully take into consideration the effect of the environment and social surroundings in which people live. This is a weakness of the theory as it somewhat ignores events and relationships in the lives of the patients which may be important and of significance if they are to be treated effectively.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work