• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate Bowlby's maternal deprivation hypothesis.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline and evaluate Bowlby's maternal deprivation hypothesis The first model of attachment that John Bowlby created was called the maternal deprivation hypothesis. It claimed that it was essential for a child's psychological health to form an attachment to its mother figure. He said that 'the young child's hunger for his mother's love and presence is as great as his hunger for food'. Bowlby held the view that if a child lacked an attachment to a mother figure it could have major effects on its development. It was a model which focused on the negative consequences. Bowlby argued that there is a critical period for the formation of attachments. This led him to claim that the attachment to the mother could not be broken in the first few years of life without serious and permanent damage to social, emotional and intellectual development. This is the maternal deprivation hypothesis (1951) which was based largely on studies during the 1930's and 1940's of children brought up in orphanages, residential nurseries and other large institutions. Bowlby proposed that young children who experience early 'bond disruption' will experience permanent emotional damage and may subsequently become 'affectionless psychopaths' - this means individuals who lack empathy for others. However, Bowlby thought that these effects would be reduced by the return of an absent mother or the introduction of a substitute mother figure. According to Bowlby, fostering or adoption could also give a child adequate care as they involve a single mother figure with whom a primary attachment can possibly be made. ...read more.

Middle

There were various reasons to criticise Bowlby's hypothesis. Rutter (1981said that Bowlby was mixing up different kinds of deprivation and also confusing cause and correlation. Bowlby's maternal deprivation hypothesis possibly came from his Freudian training i.e. the infant may be deprived from certain physical satisfactions during development and this may lead to a long-term fixation. Bowlby's attachment theory (1969) was built on ethologists work and used principles of evolution and natural selection to explain the behaviours they observed. Bowlby argued that infants had one special attachment (monotropy). This is the idea that each child has a kind of hierarchy of attachments with one emotionally distinct relationship at the top). The importance of this relationship lies in the fact that it acts as a model for all future relationships. In this case, it therefore means that infants who are deprived of care of responsive and sensitive carers during their early years will be forever emotionally scarred. A child who is securely attached to their mother is not necessarily securely attached to other attachment figures. This suggests that quality of attachment is lodged in the relationship rather than the individual, and challenges Bowlby's concept of the internal working model. The studies carried out in the early 1900's are not necessarily relevant in today's society as things have changed a lot since then, also as the sample was quite restricted i.e. specific area and children of specific back ground, this decreases the validity. ...read more.

Conclusion

The group from institutional care had not developed as much as the others. The had lower IQ's, lower language skills, were less likely to behave and follow social norms and make relationships. The main difference seemed to be the presence or absence of a mother figure during infancy. This Goldfarb suggested explains the difference between the 2 groups. Although this seems to support Bowlby's work, his research was not random and not entirely representative. The problems of the children raised in the nursery were due to a failure to form attachments during infancy. But in part these problems may have been due to the conditions and the children not having the opportunity to form attachments. Babies under 9 months were kept in single cubicles and their only human contact was to be fed and changed. It is not surprising then that they had poor language skills later on. Rutter (1981(makes the point that Bowlby's use of the term deprivation was not precise and was also quite vague. He felt that there needed to be a distinction made between deprivation and privation. Privation is a lack of attachment due to a failure to form attachment between infant and caregiver, and deprivation is the loss of an attachment which has already been made. The distinction between the two is important as each may have different effects. Despite this, Rutter accepted Bowlby's major argument, that early attachment between adult and child is essential for a child to have a healthy psychological development. Jo-Anne Cromack ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Developmental Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    If a child does not form a significant attachment to a main caregiver within ...

    3 star(s)

    This theory was pioneered by the the psychologists Dollard and Miller (1950). An example of evidence for the evolutionary theory includes a study that was conducted by psychologists James and Joyce Robertson during the year of 1951. It focused on the effects of deprivation (this refers to the loss of

  2. Attachment and Separation.

    Such models are relatively stable across the lifespan (Collins & Read, 1994). Early experiences of flexible access to feelings are regarded as formative by attachment theorists. The autonomous sense of self emerges fully from secure parent-infant relationships (Emde & Buchsbaum, 1990; Fonagy et al., 1995a; Lieberman & Pawl, 1990).

  1. Reactive Attachment Disorder

    The ratio of caregiver to child can be as extreme as 1:50 (Federici, 1998). Infants and children residing in these institutions often suffer appalling living conditions, lack of medical care, inadequate food and shelter, occurrences of physical and sexual abuse, absence of cognitive stimulation, cruelty from institution staff and poor and detached care given by insufficient staffing (Federici, 1998).

  2. Bowlby's maternal deprivation hypothesis

    Imprinting is an example of an instinct, an inherited behaviour pattern that predisposes an individual to certain forms of learning at critical times in development. Bowlby suggested that attachment behaviour is a kind of imprinting and is irreversible. However, it is possible that factors other than the absence of the mother (lack of parental supervision for example)

  1. define attachment and criticise Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation

    Distress on separation. Pleasure upon being reunited, and a general orientation of behaviour towards its primary caregiver. The formation of an attachment offers a safe base for an infant during times of stress, but psychologists wanted to determine the different attachments made between an infant and its primary caregiver.

  2. Infant's Attachments

    Nevertheless, they perform well on developmental tests and on tasks that measure cognitive skills" (Colin). Even though this type of an attachment doesn't seem to affect cognitive skills no parents wants their child to have social and emotional difficulties so making sure their child doesn't develop an avoidant attachment is very important.

  1. Investigate the stages that infants go through when developing attachments.

    This contradicts with the major assumption of the theory. E.g. - Schaffer and Emerson found that in 39% of cases the person who fed the infant was not the person whom they were first attached to. This makes the theory problematic.

  2. This assignment focuses upon Bowlby's (1951) Maternal Deprivation Hypothesis.

    The conclusions he reached were very controversial and caused arguments right from the beginning. Contrary to behaviourists and Freudians, who believed that physical comfort was a caregiver's primary concern, Bowlby suggested that emotional care was at least equally important. He states that "Maternal attachment is as essential for healthy psychological development as vitamins and minerals are for physical health".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work