• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate explanations of institutional aggression.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Nirali Jethwa Outline and evaluate explanations of institutional aggression. Aggression refers to angry or threatening behaviour that is intended to cause harm or pain psychologically or physically. Institutional aggression occurs within or between groups or institutions such as the armed forces, in prisons, hospitals or schools, or in social groups for example the Nazi's. Institutional aggression can occur within an institution. This can been seen by statistics showing over 84,000 violent or abusive incidents against staff in the NHS. Irwin and Cressey suggested the importation model which claims prisoners bring their own history and traits with them into prison. They argue that prisoners are not blank-slates when they enter the prison. This model takes into account interpersonal factors that effect the behaviour of inmates towards each other and staff. Another model is the deprivation model that tries to explain aggression in institutions. This model takes into account situational factors. It states that prisoner/patient aggression stems from the stressful and oppressive conditions of the institution, for example crowding which assumes will increase the fear and frustration levels. Staff experience also has shown to play a role in aggression. Davies and Burgesss proved the more experienced officers are less likely to suffer assault. ...read more.


With hazing it is difficult to investigate as many would see it as a bit of fun that benefits them in the long run. However we have seen hazing can get out of control and cause lasting physical and mental harm. There are also problems with investigation. We have already seen it is difficult to define, but aggression is also difficult to investigate empirically because of the dehumanising nature. It is also difficult to determine what is and what dehumanising behaviour isn?t. There is also an ethical problem for researchers as it is ethically wrong to study people who have been subjected to dehumanising violence, but also to study people who are in psychiatric wards for example who are not capable of giving full consent. There is also examples of violence between institutions and groups for example genocide which results from a difficult social condition to scapegoating the less powerful group which results in the dehumanisation of the target group. This causes moral values to become inapplicable and the killing begins. Dehumanisation is a key part in genocide and it is when members of the less powerful group are made to seem worthless and not worth of moral consideration. ...read more.


However the soldiers may have believed they had no choice. Where as the study on the personality trait shows less freewill and follows the determinism debate as it states that because it is personality caused by genetics it is hard to choose not to behave in that way. This explanation also follows the nature debate as part of the explanation suggests our aggressive behaviour is due to our personality and genes which are biological and are products of our genes. The importation model also follows the nature approach because it states for example prisoners are products of their own history and traits which are not learnt but are predisposed. However it also suggests it follows the nurture approach because aggressive behaviour can be triggered by media, for example the radio broadcasts encouraging Hutu listeners to murder Tutsi neighbours because they are ?cockroaches?. The deprivation model is also nurture as it states aggression is the product of conditions such as overcrowding which shows it is a product of their environment. Finally we have to consider ethics. It is hard to gain consent from psychiatric patients who are not capable of giving consent. It is also ethically wrong to study people who have been dehumanised as they are probably not in the right state of mind. We also have to consider psychical harm caused by aggression, hazing or research finding. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Outline and evaluate biological explanations of aggression

    4 star(s)

    the use of TAT tests does not show the XXY male is aggressive in real life situations and findings should be treated with caution. Overall the genetic approach is heavily reductionist as it does not include other approaches such as social and cognitive approaches.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Outline and evaluate explanations of institutional aggression

    3 star(s)

    All of these studies can be criticised as they are correlational and therefore a direct cause and effect cannot be proposed. Nonetheless they firmly point to the conclusion that in all institutions management has a strong role in IA. Further support for the situational model comes from Folger and Starlicki 1995 who proposed the pop corn model.

  1. Pro and Anti Social Behaviour

    However, children in the non-aggressive condition showed very little aggression towards the dolls. This supports the view that children learn specific acts of aggression and also learn increased aggressiveness through imitating models even when such models are not real.

  2. Outline and Evaluate theories and research explaning institutional aggression

    This suggests that the guards were not responsible for their actions as they were acting as directed. So therefore this study does not support the situational explanation of aggression as the pps were aware that this was a study and may have only been acting in the way they thought they were expected to act.

  1. Understanding Discipline.

    As a consequence, it might also have been noted, fire officers therefore do not are not required to learn how good management skills, nor do they routinely have the opportunity to do so, either by observation or by formal training.

  2. Why do we obey authority?

    Three out of forty did not go beyond the lowest level, twenty-eight no higher than 75 volts, thirty-eight no higher than 150 volts and only two went up to 325 volts. The proximity of the victim and also the location of the experimenter was an influencing factor in criticizing Milgrams explanation of the results from the original study.

  1. Outline and evaluate explanations of institutional aggression

    Proponents of this model argue that it is primarily the experience of imprisonment that causes extreme stress and frustration for inmates and this, in turn, leads to violence against other inmates or members of prison staff. Sykes (1958) commented on those factors that are part of the prison experience for

  2. Discuss Explanations of Institutional Aggression

    Inmate?s then express their frustration through violence towards staff who are seen as the controllers who cause the deprivation. This model clearly rejects the arguments that inmates personalities are the cause of violence or that they have been imported into the prison environment.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work