• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate factors influencing eye witness testimony

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Francesca Briggs Outline and Evaluate Factors Influencing Eye Witness Testimony The term ?eye witness testimony? refers to an area of research into the accuracy of memory concerning significant events, it is legally considered to be a reliable account of events. However, research into eye witness testimony has found that it can be affected by many psychological factors such as, anxiety and stress, reconstructive memory, selective attention and leading questions. Anxiety and stress can be associated with many factors such as, violence and crime. Clifford and Scott (1978) found that participants who saw a film of a violent event remembered less of the information than a control group who saw a less stressful version. However, Yuile and Cutshall (1986) found that witnesses of a real event had accurate memories of what happened. The police interviewed witnesses and thirteen of them were interviewed five months later. ...read more.

Middle

Bartlett (1932) showed that memory is not just a factual recording of what has occurred, but that we make ?effort after meaning?. By this, Bartlett meant that we try to fit what we remember with what we really know and understand. As a result, we quite often change our memories so they become more sensible to us. He had participants play ?Chinese Whispers? and when asked to recall the detail of the story, each person seemed to tell it in their own individual way. With repeating telling, the passages became shorter, puzzling ideas were rationalised or forgotten altogether and details changed to become more familiar or conventional. For this research Bartlett concluded, ?memory is not exact and is distorted by existing preconceptions. It seems, therefore, that each of us ?reconstructs? our memories to conform to our personal beliefs about the world.? This clearly indicates that our memories are anything but reliable records of events. ...read more.

Conclusion

Participants who were asked the ?smashed? question thought the cars were going faster than those who were asked the ?hit? question. When people were asked a week after viewing the film whether they saw any broken glass at the scene (there was none), people in the smashed group were more likely to say yes. Therefore, a leading question that encouraged them to remember the vehicles going faster also encouraged them to remember that they saw non-existent broken glass. This suggests that memory is easily distorted by questioning technique and information acquired after the event can merge with original memory causing inaccurate memory. The addition of false details to a memory of an event is referred to as confabulation. This has important implications for the questions used in police interviews of eye witnesses. In conclusion, eye witness testimony can be influenced by a number of factors, including, anxiety and stress, selective attention, reconstructive memory and leading questions. They all have a large effect on eye witness testimony and affected the results in many different ways. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    The final, and key, question was "Did you see a barn?". Although there was no barn in the film clip, the first group answered with a 2.7% total 'yes', as did 17.3% of the second group.8 This showed how the second group was more likely to recall a barn being

  2. To what extent does psychological research support the accuracy of eye witness testimony?

    makes it easier to remember, but prior experience can distort the facts. The defence or prosecution can easily manipulate a witness on a stand because he may use leading questions to warp the witness' memory of an event.

  1. "Eyewitness testimony differs from many other aspects of memory in that accuracy is of ...

    participants had to recognise the slides included in the original set. One slide showing the car stopped at the yield sign; another slide showing the car stopped at the stop sign. 75 percent of the participants who had received the consistent questions picked the correct slide, as opposed to 41 percent who had been given the misleading question.

  2. Section B Essay: Eye Witness Testimony

    were more accurate than those who saw the customer holding a cheque. This shows that the presence of a weapon can cause witnesses to be less accurate. Conversely, some psychologist have found that it may not be the presence of a weapon, but the unusualness of the situation that can cause witnesses to be less accurate in their recall.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work