• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate one Social Learning Theory explanation of personality development

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline and evaluate one Social Learning Theory explanation of personality development Bandura believed that an individual's personality was developed as a result of interaction between the individual and their environment. He called this interaction reciprocal determinism, and suggested that people play an active role in determining their behaviour in an environment: they will behave in a certain way that is appropriate for the setting that they are in, but their behaviour may also change that setting. This, according to Bandura's social-cognitive theory, occurs by means of a process of observation and imitation, known as modelling. Modelling is spontaneous and requires no deliberate effort on the part of the learner or the model (the person whose behaviour is to be observed and imitated), and reinforcement is not necessary for such learning to occur. This means that the study explains what the Behaviourist explanation of behaviour could not: the ability to produce or reproduce behaviour without reinforcement. However, although unnecessary, reinforcement will affect the performance of the behaviour; this is known as vicarious reinforcement. ...read more.

Middle

A greater amount of self-reward may lead to high self-esteem, but more self-punishment may lead to low self-esteem. In addition, Bandura's theory outlines how a person's sense of ability may affect which behaviours they carry out. He called this self-efficacy, and refers to an individual's perceived ability to carry out an action. If we believe that we can do something, we are more likely to carry out the behaviour than if we believe we can't (unless others argue persuasively that we can). This is also a development on the Behaviourist explanation, as it suggests how we may be able to determine whether, and how often, pre-learnt behaviours are carried out without the influence of others. There is research evidence to support the idea of observational learning and modelling. Rosekrans & Hartup (1967), for example, found that children who see someone else behave aggressively and being rewarded are more likely to behave aggressively themselves. Bandura et al. (1963)'s Bobo doll studies also support the theory as they demonstrate a difference between learning a behaviour and performing it. ...read more.

Conclusion

In addition, little research has been able to explain a relationship between observational learning and self-efficacy. The theory has also been criticised for not being a developmental theory: it does not account for how people's personality and behaviour changes over the course of development. Theorists argue that the kinds of information that children possess about the self changes during development, and this may be an important omission from Bandura's theory. Bee (2000), for example, points out that social learning theory can say how a child might acquire a behaviour pattern, but does not account for these underlying developmental changes. Alternative perspectives may be more suitable for describing personality development. For example, Eysenck's (1963) type theory explains how the three main personality dimensions (e.g. introvert-extrovert) may be determined by biological differences between individuals. Although this is a reductionist perspective, it does account for the effect of biological factors on personality, which the social-cognitive theory does not. Also, Thomas & Chess (1980) demonstrated that temperament interacts with life experience to produce adult personality, implying that there are innate causes that work alongside social causes like observation and imitation to produce personality. Clive Newstead ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

5 star(s)

Response to the question

Overall this is a really strong answer as it tackles both parts of the question throughly and there are very few improvements that can be made. The answer chooses Bandura's theory of social learning to look at and clearly sets ...

Read full review

Response to the question

Overall this is a really strong answer as it tackles both parts of the question throughly and there are very few improvements that can be made. The answer chooses Bandura's theory of social learning to look at and clearly sets out what his theory was (5 steps to modelling, regulating behaviour, sense of ability etc.). By looking at the different aspects of the theory rather than briefly summarising the theory as a whole it shows a thorough understanding which is essential to then go on to evaluate it. To push it a little further I would perhaps give an example of how his theory may work in practice (for example a child sees another child cheating on a test and getting away with it plus gaining good marks therefore he is more likely to cheat) which shows you don't just know the abstract concept but how to apply it in real life. The evaluation is strong as the student looks at a number of different sources in order to fully evaluate the different aspects they have talked about. In using multiple sources it once again shows in depth research and understanding of the topic. Plus the student looks at arguments both for and against the theory which is important as showing both sides of the argument allows you to reach a conclusion about it's usefulness.

Level of analysis

The analysis is really good as the student uses other sources to evaluate Bandura's study. In using the dates it shows that they know the study well and this is really important (it is more important to know the surname and date of the study than the title). If you were looking to gain a few extra marks you could learn some statistics from these studies to then use (for example with the Schunk study cited you could learn exactly how much better the children did when told their peers had done well than when they were not told anything). In also having a short paragraph on alternative theories of personality development, the student demonstrates the breadth of his knowledge to the examiner which is key but as the student keeps it concise it still stays relative to the topic rather than appearing as if they are going off on a tangent as they don't know about the topic. I would suggest putting in a brief conclusion just to summarise the points of evaluation made about the Bandura theory as this then finishes off the essay very well.

Quality of writing

The quality of the writing is really high, the formal tone used throughout is suitable for the essay format. In citing the sources the student uses the correct format of surname then date in bracket. This shows a good understanding of the subject and once again demonstrates the proper way to write an essay. The structure also works logically which helps the examiner to see the thought process and planning which has gone on behind the essay.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by greeneyedgirl 21/02/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Developmental Psychology essays

  1. Describe and evaluate Piaget's theory of cognitive development

    More children correctly say that there is still the same amount of food. This suggests that context of task may be important for children's understanding of the situation. As far as the formal operation stage is concerned, many adults answer the pendulum problem incorrectly, and Wason and Shapiro (1971)

  2. Physical, Social and Emotional Development of Children.

    Piaget suggested that children's moral development was a three-stage process. Pre-moral (0-4 years): children learn about right and wrong through their own actions and consider the results of adult around them. Moral realism (four to seven years): children's moral development is greatly influenced by the adults in their lives.

  1. How does watching television influence the behaviours and cognitions of young children?

    For example, the previously mentioned study by Anderson et Al (2007) contradicts this theory arguing that watching television at an early age can have negative implications for academic success in girls, as they become less socialised for school. It could be argued that as there have been theories and research

  2. Factors that Affect Growth and Development.

    The transition to adulthood varies among cultures, but it is generally defined as the time when individuals begin to function independently of their parents. Physical Development The activity of the pituitary gland at this time results in the increased secretion of hormones, with widespread physiological effects.

  1. Communication skills in a group interaction.

    It is also thought that ever group goes through a period in which the group struggles before they unite and work effectively together. One of the well-known theorists in which to explain the stages was that of Tuckman (1965). Tuckman suggests that most groups go through a process involving four stages before they can become effective.

  2. Transfer reps are very important and they manly accompany holidaymakers to and from the ...

    * Direct guests to coaches and taxi * They accompanies guest on coach * They give welcome speeches and commentary * Checks guest into hotel * Collecting from there hotels at the end of there stay * Directing guest to check in * Stay in check in until staying guest

  1. This curriculum plan is to be based on children aged between nought to two ...

    Blanchard and Cheska (1985) assert that the opposite of work is leisure and that people's work has the potential to be considered as play as well. Work becomes play when one's job is so satisfying and rewarding that getting paid to do it is of secondary importance.

  2. Group interaction

    This helped to show that I was interested in what they had to say and also so that they knew when it was their turn to speak. Facial expressions As facial expressions are important towards children of a young age (children learn to make facial expressions partly by copying adults),

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work