• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate research into obedience

Extracts from this document...


________________ Outline and evaluate research into obedience (12 marks) Obedience is complying with an order from another person to carry out an action. Many studies have been conducted into looking at obedience in people and what factors in a situation lead people to obey. Milgram (63) conducted a study to find out whether ordinary Americans would obey an unjust order from a person in authority to inflict pain on another person. Milgram gained a volunteer sample of 40 males from a range of backgrounds who were each paid $4.50 and were deceived into thinking they were giving electric shocks. The participants were told the study concerned the role of punishment in learning. The participant had the role of a teacher and a confederate played the learner. He had to memorize pairs of words. The teachers role was to administer a shock every time the learner made a mistake. The teacher had 30 levers each indicated the level of shock to be given. The participant watched the confederate being strapped into the electric chair. ...read more.


This study has many ethical issues that need to be taken into consideration. The study did not gain fully informed consent; therefore the participants were deceived and were not told the nature of the experiment. They were told the study concerned the role of punishment in learning and did not know it had anything to do with obedience. The participants were put under huge amounts of stress which could have caused some serious psychological damage. Participants were not allowed to withdraw from the experiment, this put pressure on them to continue with giving the shocks even if they did not want to. The study gained lots of qualitative data, Milgram was able to operationalize obedience and form consistent increments of shocks given. He used standard procedures in which he recorded screams, used scripted ?rods? and ensured participants were exposed to similar conditions. However the study was in a lab setting measuring obedience in a systematic and controlled way. Milgram asked the participants to be there, they were not naturally occurring, this means the study has low ecological validity and cannot be generalised to other real life settings. ...read more.


carried out a field experiment in New York in which he asked people on the street to pick up rubbish, stand on the other side of bust stop sign or lend a stranger money for a parking meter. Half of the time, the experimenter wore a uniform and the other half just normal clothes. This formed the 2 conditions of the independent variable. 92% of people obeyed the orders when he wore a uniform. This study has low population validity as his sample is ethnocentric, people are from New York. This response in obedience may be different in different countries. There are ethical issues in that the participants didn?t know they were in research however this would have lowered the demand characteristics and increased internal validity. The study had good ecological validity as it was conducted in a naturally occurring setting with naturally occurring participants who jut happened to be there at that time. However there would have been large individual differences with people off the street, some might have different personality types that obey more than others to people in uniform. Some people may have personality types that never obey to people even if they are in a uniform. Olivia Compton Psychology 13/02/2012 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)


The writer has mentioned two obedience studies for this piece of work. However, there are other experiments that the writer may want to include in order to improve the rating. For example, Hofling's experiment should also be included. Milgram's experiment has been explained well and the writer has included some very good critical points too. The second experiment has less detail and needs to be expanded upon.

Rating 3*

Marked by teacher Linda Penn 05/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically evaluate whether Milgrams research on obedience was ethical

    4 star(s)

    There was a great deal of debate around whether Milgram showed enough respect for his participants and many believed that they were not protected against long-term harm. There have also been claims that the studies involved lack of consent and deception amongst many other issues that are now known as ethical concerns.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Discuss the use of animals in psychological research.

    3 star(s)

    Another ethical reason against the use of animals is the animal rights argument. In contrast to the Utilitarian argument, the animal rights argument says that research using animals should never be tolerated under any circumstances. The animal rights argument argues that animals have an inherent value and should not be treated as merely renewable resources.

  1. Theories On Obedience

    On the other hand, it could be suggested that the very fact that Milgrams study was conducted in a laboratory could mean the behaviour and obedience was artificial, nullifying the results. The study was also unethical, it would have caused great amounts of stress to the participants because they believed

  2. Conformity & Obedience to Authority.

    of the experimenter. These people had been instructed to give the wrong answers on some of the trials. Under these conditions, if the assistants said that line A was the same as the standard line, some of the participants conformed and changed their response from the correct answer B, to A.

  1. "Anti-Social Behaviour is caused by a person's family background"

    There also seems to be particularly high levels of anti social behaviour from males who live in single parent working class families, this can be related to studies discussed earlier. However research was not conducted as to the reasons for why a higher amount of anti social behaviour is committed by this proportion of the population.

  2. How might prejudice develop and how might it be reduced?

    A teacher called Jane Elliot used to teach her pupils about the causes and effects of prejudice by conducting an experiment with them based on the colour of their eyes. When the children who participated in the test were interviewed in later life, it was clear that discriminatory views had been greatly reduced.

  1. Outline and evaluate explanations of obedience

    There are weaknesses to all of the situational factors that help to explain obedience. For example they are reductionist as they fail to take into account the role of the individual. There is evidence in research to support the importance of the individual, for instance Milgram.

  2. Describe and evaluate the interview as a research method in psychology

    obtaining data as outlined above, there are obvious advantages of obtaining data in a face-to-face situation and in particular the fact that the responses are more likely to be spontaneous and accurate.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work