• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

outline and evaluate research into obedience authority

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Outline and Evaluate research into obedience to authority ? 12 marks There are 3 different studies of obedience; they are Asch?s study, Milgram?s study and Holland?s study. Obedience refers to a type of social influence whereby somebody acts in response to a direct order from a figure with authority. In Milgram?s study he set out to investigate whether ordinary people will obey a legimate authority even when required to injure an innocent person. Milgram advertised for 40 male volunteers, the problem with him advertising for volunteers is that the sample may have been too small and biased. His study consisted of 2 confederates, an experimenter and the learner, with the participant always ending up as the teacher. ...read more.


Milgram?s study contained some ethical issues. For example, Milgram had to use deception. Milgram told the participants it was a study of memory, and they were not told the true purpose of the study, and the participants actually believed that they were shocking the learners. By deceiving the participants this can cause many limitations, for example the participants may not trust him again in the future, because they will never know if he is telling the true aims of the study. Another ethical issue from Milgram?s study is protection from psychological harm. During the study the participants were under great emotional strain. Milgram didn?t realise that such high levels of distress could be caused. After the study, he interviewed participants to see if they found it distressing, he found that 84% were glad they participated, and 74% felt they had learned something of personal importance. ...read more.


In the voice feedback study, the teacher and learner were in two different rooms, and communicated through a voice feedback device. For this study the obedience rate was 62.5%. This shows that the participants were more likely to shock the learner if they couldn?t see them. Realism was another important factor in the study. Orne and Holland (1968) criticised the internal validity of Milgram?s research. They found that participants had learnt to not trust the experimenter because they know that the true purpose of the experiment may be disguised. So they are less likely to take part in future studies because they may not trust the experimenter. Also, the ?distant? reaction of the experimenter may have led the participant to suppose the ?victim? can?t really be suffering, and may explain why so many participants continued with the shocks. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically evaluate whether Milgrams research on obedience was ethical

    4 star(s)

    It is true that Milgram may not have been able to predict the original findings; however, in the repeated experiments, he would have been aware of the potential for the participants to be distressed. The debriefing process is an important part of psychological research or experiments, particularly when deception has taken place as it had in Milgram's studies.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Outline and evaluate research into obedience (12)

    5 star(s)

    So effectively, the experimenter manipulated the teacher to go on subtly by language. Fourteen oout of forty showed nervous laughing fits and they repeatedly argued with the experimenter but still continued to obey. Milgram found that all 40 participants went to 300V on the shock generator and 65 percent administered the maximum shock of 450V.

  1. Conformity & Obedience to Authority.

    Richard Crutchfield decided to change the experimental method so that several people, usually five, could be tested simultaneously. The same kind of problem as Asch used, was used. Each participant sat in a booth with an array of lights and switches in front of them.

  2. Why do we obey authority?

    Brantt responded as Milgram had predicted. She was calm and cool. Once she had passed the 'slight shock' level she queried the continuation of the study and later refused to continue in a firm calm manner. She was not tense or nervous but straightforward, courteous in her behaviour and took total control of her actions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work