• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate research into the effect of misleading information on the accuracy of eyewitness testimony

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Outline and evaluate research into the effect of misleading information on the accuracy of eyewitness testimony (12 marks) Misleading questions are when questions are used to give a false memory to a person giving an eyewitness testimony, for example ?was the knife used?? rather than ?was a knife used??. The use of the word ?the? assumes there was a knife present, where there may not have been. This means the participant may subconsciously create a memory around the idea of a knife being there, meaning they may not even realize they?re doing it. One study to investigate misleading questions is the Loftus and Palmer (1974) study, the reconstruction of automobile destruction, which aimed to test their hypothesis that language used in eyewitness testimony can alter memory. They aimed to test whether leading questions can distort memories. ...read more.

Middle

Some were asked "Did you see a broken headlight?" and others were asked "Did you see the broken headlight?" There was no broken headlight in the film clip. Out of participants asked if they saw the headlight, 17% said they had seen it in comparison to those asked if seen a headlight, where 7%^ said they had seen it. They concluded The use of leading questions in an interview can lead to the creation of false memories by the eyewitness - therefore eyewitness testimony is subject to inaccuracy and its reliability can be questioned. Despite this, Yuille and Cutshall (1986) founds that in circumstances of high or low stress/anxiety, efficiency of memory is much worse. The optimum level is in the middle of the two, which is where the Loftus and Palmer study may have taken place. ...read more.

Conclusion

Loftus and Pickrell found that significantly more people from the group with the bugs bunny outline remembered seeing him in comparison to the group without the bugs bunny outline. This supports the idea that information we receive after creating a memory can alter that memory. One piece of refuting evidence is Loftus (1979). Loftus showed participants a set of slides that showed the theft of a large red purse from a handbag, they were then asked to read an account of the theft, the story gave the error that the purse had been brown, it was found that most participants except for 2, correctly remembered that the purse was red. This means, for information that is noticeable, the person who saw the event is more likely to keep their original memory intact. This shows that the original study may have lacked relevance & importance to the participants and this may have contributed to the differing findings. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    There is no guarantee of accuracy in their statement, but witnesses are still used as one of the most reliable sources of information in court cases. Schemas are not the only influence over a person's memory when trying to recall an event; they may become entwined with false or misleading information presented by others.

  2. Stroop Effect

    Also fewer participants would have to take part. The disadvantage is that fatigue and order effects may occur. Also demand characteristics may be an issue. To minimise this, counterbalancing was used. This involves halving the participants into two groups. One of the groups will do condition A first.

  1. The Effects of leading questions on Eyewitness Testimony

    as it has been found that memories can be adapted, readjusted and in some instances even changed. As this is so, all types of memory must be questioned including eyewitness testimony. For many years its validity has been questioned, this is due to the fact that heavily relied upon in the Criminal Justice System.

  2. "Eyewitness testimony differs from many other aspects of memory in that accuracy is of ...

    A key reason for memory distortion is that witnesses pick up information from other sources, a combination of memory from different experiences. Much research shows that memory more closely resembles a synthesis of experiences. Bartlett (1932) carried out research on reconstructive memory.

  1. "Eyewitness testimony differs from many other aspects of memory in that accuracy is of ...

    Findings: After a brief look at a drawing such as this one, half of the participants reported having seen the razor in the black man's hand and that the black man had been threatening the white man. In conclusion it would appear that those participants who reported having seen the

  2. The Stroop Effect

    With this in mind, this research will be counter balanced, for example if participant A reads list 1 first then participant B will read list 2 first and so on. To ensure more valid results the participant will receive three lists from the inconsistent condition and three lists from the consistent condition.

  1. Outline and evaluate the accuracy of eyewitness testimony

    the film has less of an emotional impact than a real life incident would. The students were participating in an experiment, so were expecting something to happen and might?ve been paying more attention to what was going on. Also when a watching a film the incident was likely to be

  2. Describe and Evaluate Research by E.Loftus into Eye Witness Testimony, the implications of the ...

    Loftus et al. (1987) monitored eyewitness's eye movements and found that the presence of a weapon caused the focus of the eyewitness to be drawn to the weapon rather than the person holding it or his face. As a result of research into eyewitness testimony and the factors that affected it Geiselman et al.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work