• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate research into the nature of relationships in different cultures

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Outline and evaluate research into the nature of relationships in different cultures. The nature of relationships between Western and Non-Western societies is often largely different. One distinct difference between them is whether the relationships are voluntary or non-voluntary. Many have concluded that within Western society relationships are voluntary because of high geographical mobility, access to the internet and the increased opportunities to meet other people because of its urban setting. A Non-Western society generally lacks in these features; they have fewer urban settings and most don?t have access to things like internet dating. Those living in a Non-Western Society also are less likely to travel to meet others, so a relationship is more likely to be based upon economic factors and family ties. Relationships in Non-Western culture are often involuntary. An issue with this theory is that it may not be a true representation of each demographic. There is research to show that some Non-Western cultures have experienced a dramatic shift towards voluntary relationships, posing the question as to whether this theory is an accurate representation. ...read more.


Relationships are often only considered when they propose economic benefits and approval by their family. Love and romance are not usually considered. A criticism of this theory is that it lacks temporal validity. Although 1993 may seem fairly recent, we still cannot ignore that from 1993 onwards, cultures have most likely changed. Cultures across the world are now widely accepting more Western views about relationships, and so a lot more people are focusing on their individual needs. The conclusions made from this theory cannot be generalised as they may not be considered representative of today?s society. As well as this, the theory does not regard individual differences. It ignores certain cases within Western society that don?t support the theory. For example, a person may enter a relationship simply because of the economic factors or to help support their children, even if the relationship doesn?t directly benefit them themselves. This makes the theory not suitable for generalisation, as it is not always true in some cases. ...read more.


This recent change may mean that the differences between Western and Non-Western societies may not be down to the culture itself but due to the social mobility and urbanisation of the society. This makes conclusions taken from this theory hard to generalise, as it may not even be a correct representation of Western and Non-Western culture. You cannot define a culture by its level of urbanisation. There are many distinct differences between relationships in different cultures, as highlighted by various psychological studies and theories. The main similarity in these is that they usually result in relationships being categorised by being Western or Non-Western. Although these categories are commonly used to describe cultural relationships within psychology, a major issue with this is that it makes the study or theory reductionist. This is because it suggests that all relationships can be broken down into two simple components. Reducing relationships into these two simple categories poses the danger of many factors of relationships being disregarded. Individual differences of those involved will massively shape their behaviour within the relationship. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Preventing and Reducing Crime

    3 star(s)

    at three basic body build: Sheldon's Somatotype Character Shape Picture Endomorph [viscerotonic] Relaxed, sociable, tolerant, comfort-loving, peaceful Plump, buxom, developed visceral structure Mesomorph [somatotonic] Active, assertive, vigorous, combative Muscular Ectomorph [cerebrotonic] Quiet, fragile, restrained, non-assertive, sensitive Lean, delicate, poor muscles Taken from http://wilderdom.com/personality/L6-1PersonalityTypes.html In conclusion, Sheldon believes that the study

  2. Critically consider the extent to which relationships have been shown to be different in ...

    Yelsma and Athappily (1988) researched into the difference in happiness of the couples in either arranged or love marriages. They compared Indian arranged marriages with Indian and North American love marriages and they found no difference in the amount of happiness.

  1. Free essay

    Discuss the nature of relationships in different cultures

    Collectivist cultures on the other hand, generally have fewer large urban centres -although this could be debated, there is less social mobility so people therefore have less choice about whom they interact with on a daily basis.

  2. Nature of Relationships in different cultures

    They look upon the Western view that relationships should be based on romantic love as unrealistically optimistic. Contradicting the above points; Yelsma and Athappily found no differences in marital satisfaction between Indian arranged marriages and Indian/North American love marriages. Guta and Singh, drew different conclusions: they found that love increased

  1. Mate Selection and Preferences Across Decades

    While deciding on what target the participants would choose for a dating partner, both the men and women overwhelmingly chose the physically attractive target. Sprecher stated that the women participants, however, reported being more influenced by the male targets income potential (1989).

  2. Persuasion Theory.

    public information, 3. two-way asymmetric and 4. two-way symmetric. The two-way system between an organisation and its publics allows for the public to influence the organisation to change attitudes and beliefs, just the same way as the organisation tries to change the its publics' beliefs. This worked well for the Olympic Co-ordination Authority during the construction phase of the 2000 Games.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work