• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate research (theories and/or studies) into eyewitness testimony

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline and evaluate research (theories and/or studies) into eyewitness testimony (18 marks) Eyewitness testimony investigates the accuracy of memory following a crime or an incident worth interrogating and the types of errors made in such situations. Sometimes eyewitness testimony can be unreliable, which can lead to horrific consequences in a court of law for example, hence many Psychologists have studied and theorized why this happens. One leading researcher on Eyewitness testimony is Elizabeth Loftus and her colleagues, in 1975, participants were shown an event by film of a car crash, the participants were split into 2 groups and ask questions on what they had just seen, Group 1 were asked questions that were consistent with the incident, while Group 2, were given same question except one, which was misleading (involving a barn). ...read more.

Middle

One point which lowers the credibility of Loftus's studies is that they were are artificially created, none of them were real, also the importance of the events would have not been the same, as the participants knew that they were not effecting someone life (by sending them to jail etc). The participants were not actually there, they don't get to feel the emotion or the atmosphere were can effect recall. However the study is supported by another Loftus and Loftus (1980) found that recall was no more accurate when the participants were offered money, however some people are more or less motivated by money. Loftus also theorized that with the introduction of the misleading information the original information is deleted and replaced by the new false memory. ...read more.

Conclusion

When questioned again 15 months later, the memory recall was still superior. Hence Christian and Hubinette concluded that people remember events more accurately in real time and when they are actually involved. A criticism of this is that Christian and Hubinette should have subjected the same people to the tests similar to Loftus, so they could compare how well people would recall fake mock events to real life events. However I believe there study to be good as it shows that recalling a real life event is more accurate then a mock events, so eyewitness testimony can be reliable. In general Loftus's research is very useful, as it shows us eyewitness testimony can not be completely dependable, however in light of the her studies limitations and other studies results (Christian and Hubinette), Eyewitness testimonies are still a very good way of establishing events. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Measurements of Accuracy of Eyewitness Testimonies

    4 star(s)

    Discussion Statistical analysis of the results data shows that p<0.05. This means that the results are statistically significant and have not occurred by chance. This further means that we can accept the experimental hypothesis, and reject the null hypothesis. These findings also support previous work by Loftus and Palmer (1974), on leading questions (which will be discussed in more detail).

  2. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    Jim, that he had been lost in a mall at the age of five. Just two days after being told of this false event for the first time, Chris was able to recall the "memory" in great detail. He was reported by Jim to have said, "That day I was so scared I would never see my family again.

  1. A counselling Interview

    As we examined the possibility of reducing the 'pressure cooker' effect upon Lee, his non-verbal posture became more animated, leaning forward towards me, mimicking my SOLER. Also he began playing with his fingers as he spoke and increasing eye contact, showing a subconscious awareness of advanced empathy and therefore signifying a critical point in the session.

  2. The Effects of leading questions on Eyewitness Testimony

    Leading questions rely upon an individual's personal view; they are designed to influence the participant to achieve a desired (and often incorrect) answer. Asking leading questions will help us to see whether or not eyewitness testimony can be manipulated and thus whether or not it is reliable.

  1. "Eyewitness testimony differs from many other aspects of memory in that accuracy is of ...

    These findings suggest that participants were using schemas. At the retrieval stage, recall was influenced by the schemas participants had of what objects are usually contained in an office. Bartlett's research shows us just how much memory can be interfered with and that memory is not stored passively as it is often perceived to be.

  2. Evaluate 3 Approaches to treating Mental Disorders: Psychodynamic, Biological and Behavioural Approach.

    and psychosurgery. Chemotherapy (drug treatment): The most widely used form of treatment available under biological therapies is chemotherapy (drugs) with almost 25% of NHS prescriptions being for drugs to treat mental disorders in the United Kingdom. It aims to treat psychological disorders with medications and is usually combined with other kinds of psychotherapy.

  1. Outline and evaluate the accuracy of eyewitness testimony

    The fact the study was a field experiment, might have helped to avoid demand characteristics, as the participants? being interviewed did not know they were taking part in an experiment, so might probably would?ve told the truth about what they saw.

  2. Describe and Evaluate Research by E.Loftus into Eye Witness Testimony, the implications of the ...

    In 1907, Hugo Munsterberg published ?On the Witness Stand,? in which he questioned the reliability of eyewitness testimony. When Yale law professor Edwin Borchard studied 65 wrongful convictions for his pioneering 1932 book, ?Convicting the Innocent,? he found that eyewitness testimony was the leading cause of wrongful convictions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work