• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate research (theories and/or studies) into eyewitness testimony

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline and evaluate research (theories and/or studies) into eyewitness testimony (18 marks) Eyewitness testimony investigates the accuracy of memory following a crime or an incident worth interrogating and the types of errors made in such situations. Sometimes eyewitness testimony can be unreliable, which can lead to horrific consequences in a court of law for example, hence many Psychologists have studied and theorized why this happens. One leading researcher on Eyewitness testimony is Elizabeth Loftus and her colleagues, in 1975, participants were shown an event by film of a car crash, the participants were split into 2 groups and ask questions on what they had just seen, Group 1 were asked questions that were consistent with the incident, while Group 2, were given same question except one, which was misleading (involving a barn). ...read more.

Middle

One point which lowers the credibility of Loftus's studies is that they were are artificially created, none of them were real, also the importance of the events would have not been the same, as the participants knew that they were not effecting someone life (by sending them to jail etc). The participants were not actually there, they don't get to feel the emotion or the atmosphere were can effect recall. However the study is supported by another Loftus and Loftus (1980) found that recall was no more accurate when the participants were offered money, however some people are more or less motivated by money. Loftus also theorized that with the introduction of the misleading information the original information is deleted and replaced by the new false memory. ...read more.

Conclusion

When questioned again 15 months later, the memory recall was still superior. Hence Christian and Hubinette concluded that people remember events more accurately in real time and when they are actually involved. A criticism of this is that Christian and Hubinette should have subjected the same people to the tests similar to Loftus, so they could compare how well people would recall fake mock events to real life events. However I believe there study to be good as it shows that recalling a real life event is more accurate then a mock events, so eyewitness testimony can be reliable. In general Loftus's research is very useful, as it shows us eyewitness testimony can not be completely dependable, however in light of the her studies limitations and other studies results (Christian and Hubinette), Eyewitness testimonies are still a very good way of establishing events. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Measurements of Accuracy of Eyewitness Testimonies

    4 star(s)

    The independent groups design was used in this study, which has both advantages and disadvantages. The advantages of this design are that order effects, such as boredom and fatigue, (which can alter concentration) and demand characteristics are eliminated, because different participants can only do one condition of the experiment.

  2. "Eyewitness testimony differs from many other aspects of memory in that accuracy is of ...

    The sets of slides were identical except for one slide for one group. This slide showed a red car stopping at a junction with a give way sign; the other group saw the sane car stopping at a junction with a stop sign.

  1. Outline and evaluate the research into eyewitness testimony.

    The findings were that witnessed who had seen the man holding the knife emerge accurately identified him, 44% of the time, whereas the participants who saw the man carrying the bloodstained knife only identified him 33%. This finding has come to be known as 'weapon focus.'

  2. 'It is clear from psychological research into memory and eye-witness testimony that accounts of ...

    other' and in others 'hit' was changed to 'smashed into' when the verb 'hit' was used the average speed was considerably lower than when the words 'smashed into' were used. This supports the statement as if questions asked to the eyewitness where phrased in a different way it may distort there memory and change it completely.

  1. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    a desk, a calendar or a typewriter), some that were more unusual (e.g. a pair of pliers, a skull and a brick). In recall tests it was found that participants were easily able to remember the standard office items, however were less successful at naming the random items.

  2. Evaluate 3 Approaches to treating Mental Disorders: Psychodynamic, Biological and Behavioural Approach.

    Similarly there are many disorders, for example depression, that seem to feature abnormal levels of neurotransmitters and so a biological explanation may be more sensible than a simple behaviourist one. Behaviourism can explain the role of the media in the acquisition of certain abnormal behaviours.

  1. Outline and evaluate the accuracy of eyewitness testimony

    Results showed that the researchers recorded more total details than the police and that leading questions did not affect the witness' memories of the incident- Yuille and Cutshall concluded that eyewitness statements are remarkably accurate; more accurate than lab experiments would suggest.

  2. Describe and Evaluate Research by E.Loftus into Eye Witness Testimony, the implications of the ...

    when a man in cowboy boots came into the house and raped the oldest girl who was 10 years old. When police started to investigate the rape, the three girls all remembered the attack differently. One police report said the 10-year old victim did not see her attacker?s face.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work