• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate research (theories/studies) into life changes as a source of stress (Holmes & Rahe), and discuss potential stressors and ethical issues in research on obedience.

Extracts from this document...


Outline and evaluate research (theories/studies) into life changes as a source of stress (Holmes & Rahe), and discuss potential stressors and ethical issues in research on obedience. Because social psychology is primarily concerned with the behaviour of humans, researchers often need to use techniques such as deception and uninformed consent in order to obtain ecologically valid results. How ethically acceptable these methods are depend on any long-term effects of the research, and exactly what the research has discovered. The potential influence of these stressors are addressed in the second part of this essay. The British Psychological Society (BPS) has ethical guidelines which include deception, informed consent, protection from harm and right to withdraw, all of which must be adhered to in a piece of research. Milgram's experiment on obedience to authority used staged electric shocks in order to test how far participants (pps) would follow orders. Deception was a major part of this experiment, in many ways. The pps in the study were told from the outset that it was an experiment concerning punishment and learning, when in fact it was observing obedience. ...read more.


They were entering a situation which was ambiguous and almost anything could have happened. However, if Zimbardo had told them what behaviour he was expecting, this could have led to expectancy bias and demand characteristics, and therefore would have been far less valid. Protection from harm was a highly criticised part of Zimbardo's research, Only physical abuse was forbidden, and therefore pps were likely to have suffered large amounts of psychological abuse. Zimbardo knew he would be testing negative aspects of prison life such as humiliation and powerlessness, so some of the results would have been predicted to some extent. He claimed he made every effort to select mentally stable pps, and there was no way of foreseeing the events that occurred. He, like Milgram, also found no evidence of long term harm during debriefing. Although both Milgram and Zimbardo undoubtedly used undesirable methods, few seemed completely unnecessary or unjustified. One key question relating to ethics is "do the ends justify the means?", and in these two experiments, the results do seem particularly significant. Milgram specifically wanted to examine the kind of situation that occurred during the holocaust, and argues that his findings suggest reasons why people obeyed to that extent. ...read more.


However, individual differences play a major part in stress and not everyone is going to find each life event as stressful. There is also no way to establish cause and effect, the data produced is correlational. It also does not account for cultural differences in stress; what is stressful in one culture may not even apply to another, e.g. Christmas; not only does not everyone celebrates this, but for some it can be very relaxing, whereas for others, it can be an extremely stressful time. It defines stressful life events as those which require 'psychological restructuring', yet there are many events that fit into this definition without being stressful; winning the lottery requires a huge life change, yet on the whole, this event can ease stress massively. In conclusion, Holmes and Rahe's scale focuses only on life-events as sources of stress, and not on everyday events. Many people will not experience many of the life events on the SSRS, yet will still be stressed due to daily stressors. The 'Hassles and Uplift' scale was developed as an alternative to the Social Readjustment Rating Scale by Lazarus and Kanner, dealing with less unusual events, and therefore could be seen to provide a more applicable alternative that can explain the impact of life events (both everyday and rare) on stress levels. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically evaluate whether Milgrams research on obedience was ethical

    4 star(s)

    Although the ethical guidelines of today state that intentional deception of participants should be avoided whenever possible, it would quite clearly be impossible to conduct some psychological experiments without withholding information about the nature of the research.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Describe and evaluate psychological research into conformity and obedience in humans, and consider ways ...

    4 star(s)

    However Asch's experimental situation is sometimes criticised as lacking ecological validity because it was in a set up situation and the answer was too easy. Asch results may have been true to the time of the experiment but Perrin and Spencer (1980, 1981)

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Outline and evaluate research into obedience

    3 star(s)

    65% of participants went to the end of the shock generator; this is the whole 450 volts which were 40 separate shocks. Most participants found the experiment very stressful and wanted to stop. Milgram concluded that under certain circumstances, most people will obey orders that go against their conscience.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    "Describe the main features of conformity and obedience analyse two conformity and obedience studies ...

    in this case it was if they wore a white coat (doctors) this gave them a sense of importance and power. I will now write about two social studies carried out to investigate how people obey to authority and what affects this.

  1. Critically Evaluate Research Into Conformity, Compliance and Obedience.

    Asch's (1951) study was aimed at discovering whether or not a majority would influence a minority even in an unambiguous situation. He used the line judgement task, all the participants were shown two cards, one displaying three vertical lines of different sizes and the other displaying only one, and they

  2. Were Milgram and Zimbardo unethical?

    Reasons include; fear of rejection, wanting approval, simply to be identified as part of a group and to show loyalty. Informational influence: This type of influence is concerned with the fear of looking unintelligent and believing others know better, especially if the task is difficult or unfamiliar.

  1. conjugal roles

    Chapter 5 evaluation I chose to do the subject of conjugal roles in nuclear families because it is always a subject on everyone's mind living in a family "who does more work?". My aims were appropriate for the topic of study that I chose because my questionnaire was able to uncover these aims.

  2. In relation to Milgrams (1963) study into obedience, describe and discuss the ethical issues ...

    Eventually all screams and banging would stop and silence would ensue. This was the point when many of the teachers exhibited extreme distress and would ask to stop the experiment. Some questioned the experiment, but many were encouraged to go on and told they would not be responsible for any results.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work